Skip to main content

26% fall in RTI pleas, Gujarat departments 'not registering' applications: MAGP

By A Representative
The annual report of the Gujarat’s State Information Commission (SIC) for 2018-19 submitted to the state legislative assembly on the implementation of the Right to Information (RTI) Act shows that there are over 4,800 cases pending before the SIC, even as five commissioners’ posts are vacant.
The report also says, the highest number of appeals -- 2,050 -- was filed against the panchayat and rural housing department, followed by revenue department, 1,874 appeals, and the urban development department, 1,187 appeals.
Pankti Jog, who heads the state’s RTI watchdog, Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel (MAGP), said in a statement, said, “Surprisingly, some departments have shown that they have received zero applications throughout the year. This is because departments do not register the received applications as a rule.”
During the year, there were 79 cases for whom CIC fined government officials, including 16 taluka-level officials, including 16 talatis, 9 mamlatdar, 5 taluka development officers, 7 police inspectors, 10 municipal chief officers, municipal chief officers, 12 principals or headmasters. The total penalty amount was Rs 6.55 lakh.
“However”, regretted Jog, “No steps were taken to initiate department inquiry against defaulting officials.”
Pankti Jog
Pointing out that the number of applications during the year went down by a whopping 26% in a year (they dropped from 1,52,097 to 1,18,638), Jog said, “It is a matter of concern that the number of RTI applications is decreasing. This is because the level of transparency appears to have gone down. It is also a matter of concern that there have been more cases of rejection of information.”
She added, “The departments have not made any amendments in proceedings towards parting with information. Meant for RTI information, the boards, put up at panchayat offices, did not display anything during the 150th year of Mahatma Gandhi’s birth centenary.”
Calling this “a very serious matter”, Jog said, there have been as many as 50 cases of attacking those who had sought information sought from the state’s panchayats. This could be one major reason behind the decline in the number of appeals. ”
Jog demanded, the Gujarat government should develop a portal, where accurate information about the working of panchayats is made available at one place. For some reason, the government appears very apathetic in this regard. While old information is placed on government websites, misleading citizens, lack of transparency abounds. There is delay in examining people's grievances, and negligence in implementation.

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”