Skip to main content

Social workers, architects, students, historians, common people come together, protest "politics" of renaming Ahmedabad

Siddhi Syed Ni Jali: Symbol of Ahmedabad
By Nandini Oza*
No sooner did the BJP leaders of Gujarat announce the intention of changing the name of Ahmedabad to Karnavati just before Diwali, on November 7, 2018, many people’s mood changed from festivity to heated debate and furor across the state. For many of us, an online petition, initiated by Bandish Soparkar, on change.org protesting name change came to immediate rescue.

Many chose to ignore the family reunion over Diwali and shared the petition online fervently through the night. In less than 24 hours, the signatories rose to seven thousand! In just three days the number of people registering their protest rose to over 15,000, keeping the auspicious Diwali celebrations on the side!
There has been no looking back since, as social workers, architects, students, historians, common people continue to register their opposition and demand that Ahmedabad remain Ahmedabad. Soon, a group of over 250 young people started a Twitter protest with #IAmAhmedabad and a WhatsApp group, Save Heritage Ahmedabad.
By then, media began to report the protests, some of the first being, The Wire, The Week and CounterView, and among the regional, Sandesh, Ahmedabad Mirror, Divya Bhaskar, etc. Not only did the newspapers report the protests accurately but also published opinion of eminent people against name change.
Some of the newspapers took lead and began reporting the growing sentiment of the common people against name change and the difficulties people would face if the name of the city were to be changed. Importantly, many regional newspapers gave space to academic history of the city of Ahmedabad against rhetoric and majoritarian falsehood.
This led to further awakening and soon individual protests and statements snowballed on social media. Those who found it easier registered their protest by posting individual voice and video recordings on Facebook and Twitter. Video of a small girl protesting against change of name became popular.
Screenshot from a Gujarati newspaper reflecting protest against name change
Online voting exercise was started by different groups, and some of the early trends showed overwhelming support to not changing the name of the city. It was only when jokes on the proposition of name change began to make rounds that one knew that half the battle has been easy. A Facebook post said, if at all the name of Ahmedabad is changed, people will be kept busy changing their Aaadhaar, election card, pancard, and so many other cards and documents. The intention of the government is to not let people be free at all, it added.
Finally after six anxious days of tense campaign for many during otherwise fun Diwali days, when protests on social media turned humorous, many who had taken the lead on the first day after the announcement breathed a sigh of relief.
Opposition to the changing of the name of Ahmedabad city is now catching up fast. The news web portal Moje Gujarat shows how and why the people of Gujarat are angry against name change of India's first UNESCO heritage city and how BJP seems to be on the back foot.
However, people are not taking things easy and protests against changing the name of Ahmedabad may take the scale of #VikasGandoThayoChe (development has gone mad) that one witnessed just before the 2017 state elections.
The protest at that time in 2017 critiquing the Gujarat model of development had become so popular that the entire top level BJP team and machinery, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi had to campaign for state elections for several weeks leaving all other work on the side. And yet, the BJP came to power with much lower seat count in the state in 2017.
No doubt, for BJP and right-wing Hindutva politicians changing the name of the city of Ahmedabad has been a long desire. Unfortunately for them, each time, the people of Ahmedabad and Gujarat have stood up and protested, and they have had to retreat.
An interview with one of the most important public figures of Gujarat, late Girishbhai Patel, throws light on the earlier battle of the people of the state that thwarted the earlier attempt by BJP to change the name of Ahmedabad.
To a Gujarati, Girishbhai needs no introduction. For others, Girishbhai was known as the PIL (Public Interest Litigation) man of Gujarat who had filed over 200 PILs for greater common good and for the underprivileged communities of the state.
The interview of Girishbhai, taken by me in the years 2009 and 2017, is part of my forth coming book on peoples’ history of Gujarat. I reproduce some select excerpts from the interview here where Girishbhai talks about their struggle against naming Ahmedabad as Karnavati.
The interview is in Gujarati, and select excerpts are translated here in English:
Girishbhai: "…here in Gujarat, Nalin Bhatt from Baroda was the leader of BJP. He was the Health Minister. He issued afatwa that on every Dashera, there should be a poojan in every single hospital. During Dashera the tradition actually isthat pooja of weapons is performed. As there are no weapons in hospitals, pooja of medical equipment would have to be carried out!"[laughs]
I said, “Sir, look at the approach, medical equipment in hospitals are now considered weapons!”
Girishbhai [laughs]: "We filed a petition against that order. The High Court judge hearing the matter here, who later became a judge in the Supreme Court was a staunch person and asked me, 'What is your objection to this? What is wrong in performing poojan?' I said 'Sir, suppose I am a Muslim, I would not participate, not because I am opposed to your worship but this is a public institution.' 
"After forty five minutes of arguments in the court, the judge issued a notice. That notice proved to be a blessing because at that time a conflict had arisen between Chimanbhai Patel and Keshubhai Patel. 
"Chimanbhai was the Chief Minister at that time and he did not want that something like this should happen. But Chimanbhai had no courage to speak out as he had no majority. It was a joint Government of the two. No sooner did the court issue the notice that the circular was withdrawn. Pooja was stopped...
"The other important victory was concerning the changing of the name of the Ahmedabad city. Back then, they (BJP) tried to change the name of Ahmedabad to Karnavati twice. The Ahmedabad corporation mostly had members belonging to the BJP in those days. 
Protest on Facebook
It was the VP Singh government at the centre I think. These people decided to change the name of Ahmedabad to Karnavati, as they did not want the history of Ahmed Shah to be reflected in the name of the city. The intention was to remove the name of a Muslim. Many of our friends came together. All our friends collectively worked hard and discovered/researched the history of the city. 
"We found that there was a village of an Adivasi chieftain somewhere here. I have forgotten the name of the Adivasi ruler but there is also a temple to his name somewhere nearby. Therefore we insisted that if you wish to change the name of Ahmedabad, you will have to change it to the original Adivasi name 
(Click HERE for academic history of the naming of Ahmedabad city and not merely majoritarian falsehood and rhetoric; also see the book "Shahernama", by Saroopben Dhruv.)
"We filed a petition in the High Court stating the procedure and the various steps that would have to be undertaken in order to change the name of the city. If the name is to be changed, there is so much to be done and so many procedures to be followed that it is not easy. Besides, the name would have to be changed at so many places including in the railway, post, etc, etc.
The Ahmedabad High Court issued a notice and the matter was admitted. In those days, George Fernandes was in our favour. Discussions were held with George Fernandes about this matter and ultimately, the Central government did not give permission for the name change. That attempt was frustrated. 
Once again, the second time when the BJP Government was in power that a renewed attempt to change the name of Ahmedabad was made. Once again we fought and once again Fernandes came to our help. 
"This second attempt was also frustrated. This was the third important event where we thwarted these people’s saffronisation process. Even today these (BJP) people regret not being able to change the name of Ahmedabad to Karnnavati. They use the name Karnavati unofficially but officially they could not change it into Karnavati.”
As reported in the newspaper "Sandesh" (October 14, 1998), a petition was filed by President, Council of Social Justice, Valjibhai Patel, Prof Nisar Ansari, Govindbhai Solanki, Anishaben Mirza and others challenging the resolution passed by the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation on May 11, 1999 to change the name of Ahmedabad city. Advocates Girishbhai Patel, Harubhai Mehta and Ketan Dave represented the petitioners in the Gujarat High Court.
Representing the state government, additional advocate general, SN Shelat, placed before the court a letter by the Home Ministry, Government of India, stating that there was no plan to change the name of the city. The court, taking on record the letter, dismissed the matter.
Thus, in the past also people of Gujarat have fought tooth and nail to retain the heritage and culture of Ahmedabad and its name against great odds -- fighting money and muscle power with sheer grit and determination. Today, once again people of the State fight with all their might against the unprecedented muscle, money and state power, not allowing the struggle of the previous generation go waste.
Interestingly, the Prime Minister at that time was Atal Bihari Vajpayee (from March 19, 1998) and Home Minster was Lal Krishna Advani. While BJP may forget its NDA partners like George Fernandes and their legacy, the younger generation of Gujarat will fight to preserve the secular legacy of the State inherited from stalwarts like Girishbhai Patel and countless others.
---
*Independent researcher and activist, formerly with Narmada Bachao Andolan. A version of this article was first published in her blog History Less Known

Comments

TRENDING

Girl child education: 20 major states 'score' better than Gujarat, says GoI report

By Rajiv Shah
A Government of India report, released last month, has suggested that “model” Gujarat has failed to make any progress vis-à-vis other states in ensuring that girls continue to remain enrolled after they leave primary schools. The report finds that, in the age group 14-17, Gujarat’s 71% girls are enrolled at the secondary and higher secondary level, which is worse than 20 out of 22 major states for which data have been made available.

Savarkar in Ahmedabad "declared support" to two-nation theory in 1937, followed by Jinnah three years later

By Our Representative
One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Congress 'promises' cancellation of Adani power project: Jharkhand elections

Counterview Desk
Pointing out that people's issues take a backseat in Jharkhand's 2019 assembly elections, the state's civil rights organization, the Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha, a coalition of activists and people’s organisations, has said that political parties have largely ignored in their electoral manifestos the need to implement the fifth schedule of the Constitution in a predominantly tribal district.

Hindutva founders 'borrowed' Nazi, fascist idea of one flag, one leader, one ideology

By Shamsul Islam*
With the unleashing of the reign of terror by the RSS/BJP rulers against working-class, peasant organizations, women organizations, student movements, intellectuals, writers, poets and progressive social/political activists, India also witnessed a series of resistance programmes organized by the pro-people cultural organizations in different parts of the country. My address in some of these programmes is reproduced here... 
***  Before sharing my views on the tasks of artists-writers-intellectuals in the times of fascism, let me briefly define fascism and how it is different from totalitarianism. Totalitarianism is political concept, a dictatorship of an individual, family or group which prohibits opposition in any form, and exercises an extremely high degree of control over public and private life. It is also described as authoritarianism.
Whereas fascism, while retaining all these repressive characteristics, also believes in god-ordained superiority of race, cultur…

Ex-World Bank chief economist doubts spurt in India's ease of doing business rank

By Rajiv Shah
This is in continuation of my previous blog where I had quoted from a commentary which top economist Prof Kaushik Basu had written in the New York Times (NYT) a little less than a month ago, on November 6, to be exact. He recalled this article through a tweet on November 29, soon after it was made known that India's growth rate had slumped (officially!) to 4.5%.

With RSS around, does India need foreign enemy to undo its democratic-secular fabric?

By Shamsul Islam*
Many well-meaning liberal and secular political analysts are highly perturbed by sectarian policy decisions of RSS/BJP rulers led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, especially after starting his second inning. They are vocal in red-flagging lynching incidents, policies of the Modi government on Kashmir, the National Register of Citizens (NRC), the demand for 'Bharat Ratna' to Savarkar who submitted 6-7 mercy petitions to the British masters (getting remission of 40 years out of 50 years' sentence), and the murder of constitutional norms in Goa, Karnataka and now in Maharashtra.

Post-Balakot, danger that events might spiral out of control is 'greater, not less'

By Tapan Bose*
The fear of war in South Asia is increasing. Tensions are escalating between India and Pakistan after the Indian defence minister's announcement in August this year that India may revoke its current commitment to only use nuclear weapons in retaliation for a nuclear attack, known as ‘no first use’. According to some experts who are watching the situation the risk of a conflict between the two countries has never been greater since they both tested nuclear weapons in 1998.

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.

Worrying signs in BJP: Modi, Shah begin 'cold-shouldering' Gujarat CM, party chief

By RK Misra*
The political developments in neighbouring Maharashtra where a Shiv Sena-NCP-Congress government assumed office has had a trickle down effect in Gujarat with both the ruling BJP and the Congress opposition going into revamp mode.

'Favouring' tribals and ignoring Adivasis? Behind coercion of India's aborigines

By Mohan Guruswamy*
Tribal people account for 8.2% of India’s population. They are spread over all of India’s States and Union Territories. Even so they can be broadly classified into three groupings. The first grouping consists of populations who predate the Indo-Aryan migrations. These are termed by many anthropologists as the Austro-Asiatic-speaking Australoid people.