Skip to main content

Social workers, architects, students, historians, common people come together, protest "politics" of renaming Ahmedabad

Siddhi Syed Ni Jali: Symbol of Ahmedabad
By Nandini Oza*
No sooner did the BJP leaders of Gujarat announce the intention of changing the name of Ahmedabad to Karnavati just before Diwali, on November 7, 2018, many people’s mood changed from festivity to heated debate and furor across the state. For many of us, an online petition, initiated by Bandish Soparkar, on change.org protesting name change came to immediate rescue.

Many chose to ignore the family reunion over Diwali and shared the petition online fervently through the night. In less than 24 hours, the signatories rose to seven thousand! In just three days the number of people registering their protest rose to over 15,000, keeping the auspicious Diwali celebrations on the side!
There has been no looking back since, as social workers, architects, students, historians, common people continue to register their opposition and demand that Ahmedabad remain Ahmedabad. Soon, a group of over 250 young people started a Twitter protest with #IAmAhmedabad and a WhatsApp group, Save Heritage Ahmedabad.
By then, media began to report the protests, some of the first being, The Wire, The Week and CounterView, and among the regional, Sandesh, Ahmedabad Mirror, Divya Bhaskar, etc. Not only did the newspapers report the protests accurately but also published opinion of eminent people against name change.
Some of the newspapers took lead and began reporting the growing sentiment of the common people against name change and the difficulties people would face if the name of the city were to be changed. Importantly, many regional newspapers gave space to academic history of the city of Ahmedabad against rhetoric and majoritarian falsehood.
This led to further awakening and soon individual protests and statements snowballed on social media. Those who found it easier registered their protest by posting individual voice and video recordings on Facebook and Twitter. Video of a small girl protesting against change of name became popular.
Screenshot from a Gujarati newspaper reflecting protest against name change
Online voting exercise was started by different groups, and some of the early trends showed overwhelming support to not changing the name of the city. It was only when jokes on the proposition of name change began to make rounds that one knew that half the battle has been easy. A Facebook post said, if at all the name of Ahmedabad is changed, people will be kept busy changing their Aaadhaar, election card, pancard, and so many other cards and documents. The intention of the government is to not let people be free at all, it added.
Finally after six anxious days of tense campaign for many during otherwise fun Diwali days, when protests on social media turned humorous, many who had taken the lead on the first day after the announcement breathed a sigh of relief.
Opposition to the changing of the name of Ahmedabad city is now catching up fast. The news web portal Moje Gujarat shows how and why the people of Gujarat are angry against name change of India's first UNESCO heritage city and how BJP seems to be on the back foot.
However, people are not taking things easy and protests against changing the name of Ahmedabad may take the scale of #VikasGandoThayoChe (development has gone mad) that one witnessed just before the 2017 state elections.
The protest at that time in 2017 critiquing the Gujarat model of development had become so popular that the entire top level BJP team and machinery, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi had to campaign for state elections for several weeks leaving all other work on the side. And yet, the BJP came to power with much lower seat count in the state in 2017.
No doubt, for BJP and right-wing Hindutva politicians changing the name of the city of Ahmedabad has been a long desire. Unfortunately for them, each time, the people of Ahmedabad and Gujarat have stood up and protested, and they have had to retreat.
An interview with one of the most important public figures of Gujarat, late Girishbhai Patel, throws light on the earlier battle of the people of the state that thwarted the earlier attempt by BJP to change the name of Ahmedabad.
To a Gujarati, Girishbhai needs no introduction. For others, Girishbhai was known as the PIL (Public Interest Litigation) man of Gujarat who had filed over 200 PILs for greater common good and for the underprivileged communities of the state.
The interview of Girishbhai, taken by me in the years 2009 and 2017, is part of my forth coming book on peoples’ history of Gujarat. I reproduce some select excerpts from the interview here where Girishbhai talks about their struggle against naming Ahmedabad as Karnavati.
The interview is in Gujarati, and select excerpts are translated here in English:
Girishbhai: "…here in Gujarat, Nalin Bhatt from Baroda was the leader of BJP. He was the Health Minister. He issued afatwa that on every Dashera, there should be a poojan in every single hospital. During Dashera the tradition actually isthat pooja of weapons is performed. As there are no weapons in hospitals, pooja of medical equipment would have to be carried out!"[laughs]
I said, “Sir, look at the approach, medical equipment in hospitals are now considered weapons!”
Girishbhai [laughs]: "We filed a petition against that order. The High Court judge hearing the matter here, who later became a judge in the Supreme Court was a staunch person and asked me, 'What is your objection to this? What is wrong in performing poojan?' I said 'Sir, suppose I am a Muslim, I would not participate, not because I am opposed to your worship but this is a public institution.' 
"After forty five minutes of arguments in the court, the judge issued a notice. That notice proved to be a blessing because at that time a conflict had arisen between Chimanbhai Patel and Keshubhai Patel. 
"Chimanbhai was the Chief Minister at that time and he did not want that something like this should happen. But Chimanbhai had no courage to speak out as he had no majority. It was a joint Government of the two. No sooner did the court issue the notice that the circular was withdrawn. Pooja was stopped...
"The other important victory was concerning the changing of the name of the Ahmedabad city. Back then, they (BJP) tried to change the name of Ahmedabad to Karnavati twice. The Ahmedabad corporation mostly had members belonging to the BJP in those days. 
Protest on Facebook
It was the VP Singh government at the centre I think. These people decided to change the name of Ahmedabad to Karnavati, as they did not want the history of Ahmed Shah to be reflected in the name of the city. The intention was to remove the name of a Muslim. Many of our friends came together. All our friends collectively worked hard and discovered/researched the history of the city. 
"We found that there was a village of an Adivasi chieftain somewhere here. I have forgotten the name of the Adivasi ruler but there is also a temple to his name somewhere nearby. Therefore we insisted that if you wish to change the name of Ahmedabad, you will have to change it to the original Adivasi name 
(Click HERE for academic history of the naming of Ahmedabad city and not merely majoritarian falsehood and rhetoric; also see the book "Shahernama", by Saroopben Dhruv.)
"We filed a petition in the High Court stating the procedure and the various steps that would have to be undertaken in order to change the name of the city. If the name is to be changed, there is so much to be done and so many procedures to be followed that it is not easy. Besides, the name would have to be changed at so many places including in the railway, post, etc, etc.
The Ahmedabad High Court issued a notice and the matter was admitted. In those days, George Fernandes was in our favour. Discussions were held with George Fernandes about this matter and ultimately, the Central government did not give permission for the name change. That attempt was frustrated. 
Once again, the second time when the BJP Government was in power that a renewed attempt to change the name of Ahmedabad was made. Once again we fought and once again Fernandes came to our help. 
"This second attempt was also frustrated. This was the third important event where we thwarted these people’s saffronisation process. Even today these (BJP) people regret not being able to change the name of Ahmedabad to Karnnavati. They use the name Karnavati unofficially but officially they could not change it into Karnavati.”
As reported in the newspaper "Sandesh" (October 14, 1998), a petition was filed by President, Council of Social Justice, Valjibhai Patel, Prof Nisar Ansari, Govindbhai Solanki, Anishaben Mirza and others challenging the resolution passed by the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation on May 11, 1999 to change the name of Ahmedabad city. Advocates Girishbhai Patel, Harubhai Mehta and Ketan Dave represented the petitioners in the Gujarat High Court.
Representing the state government, additional advocate general, SN Shelat, placed before the court a letter by the Home Ministry, Government of India, stating that there was no plan to change the name of the city. The court, taking on record the letter, dismissed the matter.
Thus, in the past also people of Gujarat have fought tooth and nail to retain the heritage and culture of Ahmedabad and its name against great odds -- fighting money and muscle power with sheer grit and determination. Today, once again people of the State fight with all their might against the unprecedented muscle, money and state power, not allowing the struggle of the previous generation go waste.
Interestingly, the Prime Minister at that time was Atal Bihari Vajpayee (from March 19, 1998) and Home Minster was Lal Krishna Advani. While BJP may forget its NDA partners like George Fernandes and their legacy, the younger generation of Gujarat will fight to preserve the secular legacy of the State inherited from stalwarts like Girishbhai Patel and countless others.
---
*Independent researcher and activist, formerly with Narmada Bachao Andolan. A version of this article was first published in her blog History Less Known

Comments

TRENDING

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

RSS' 25,000 Shishu Mandirs 'follow' factory school model of Christian missionaries

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
The executive committee of the International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences (IUAES) recently decided to drop the KISS University in Odisha as the co-host of the World Anthropology Congress-2023. The decision is driven by the argument that KISS University is a factory school.

India must recognise: 4,085 km Himalayan borders are with Tibet, not China

By Tenzin Tsundue, Sandeep Pandey*
There has as been a cancerous wound around India’s Himalayan neck ever since India's humiliating defeat during the Chinese invasion of India in 1962. The recent Galwan Valley massacre has only added salt to the wound. It has come to this because, when China invaded the neighbouring country Tibet in 1950, India was in high romance with the newly-established communist regime under Mao Zedong after a bloody revolution.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur*
Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Time to give Covid burial, not suspend, World Bank's 'flawed' Doing Business ranking

By Maju Varghese*
On August 27, the World Bank came out with a statement suspending the Doing Business Report. The statement said that a number of irregularities have been reported regarding changes to the data in the Doing Business 2018 and Doing Business 2020 reports, published in October 2017 and 2019. The changes in the data were inconsistent with the Doing Business methodology.

Delhi riots: Cops summoning, grilling, intimidating young to give 'false' evidence

Counterview Desk
More than 440 concerned citizens have supported the statement issued by well-known bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander ‘We will not be silenced’ which said that the communal riots in Delhi in February 2020 have not been caused by any conspiracy, as alleged by the Delhi Police, but by “hate speech and provocative statements made by a number of political leaders of the ruling party.”

WHO chief ignores India, cites Pak as one of 7 top examples in fight against Covid-19

By Our Representative
In a move that would cause consternation in India’s top policy makers in the Modi government, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, World Health Organization (WHO) director-general, has singled out Pakistan among seven countries that have set “examples” in investing in a healthier and safer future in order to fight the Covid-19 pandemic.

Agricultural reform? Small farmers will be more vulnerable, corporates to 'fix' price

By Dibyendu Chaudhuri*
Agriculture employs 42% of the total work force whereas it contributes only 16% to the country’s GDP. The average annual growth rate in agriculture has remained static to 2.9% since the last six years. This means that the post-green revolution conventional agriculture has reached its peak. Responsiveness of soil fertility to fertiliser application, an indicator of stagnancy in agriculture, shows declining trend since 1970. The worst sufferer has been the small and marginal farmers who constitute 86% of total farmers.

Tata Mundra: NGOs worry as US court rules World Bank can't be sued for 'damages'

By Kate Fried, Mir Jalal*
On August 24 evening, a federal court ruled that the World Bank Group cannot be sued for any damage caused by its lending, despite last year’s Supreme Court ruling in the same case that these institutions can be sued for their “commercial activity” in the United States.