Skip to main content

"Neglected" modernization of madrasas: Apex court issues notice to MHRD, 18 states

By Firoz Bakht Ahmed*
The Supreme Court bench of Justices Rohington Nariman and Abdul Nazeer, in a landmark order, on November 2, took serious note while hearing a petition by a madrasa teacher on not releasing the grant for the beleaguered madarasas registered under SPQEM (Special Project for Quality Education to Madrasas). The bench issued notices to the Ministry of Human Resource Development and the principal secretaries of 18 states, asking them to forthwith file replies in connection with defying the order of givings salaries to the madrasa teachers.
While arguing the case, Tibah Siddiqui (who had earlier secured the relief in the famous Qaumi School case of the Delhi High Court), stated that the madrasa modernization scheme was languishing and dying a natural death. What is lamented is the totally lackadaisical and unconcerned attitude of the government. Ms Siddiqui went on to term it as even unconstitutional, apathetic and illegal as no funds had been released for the last three years.
A committee was constituted under the chairpersonship of Professor Azra, also a consultant with the Sachar Committee that suggested that as per the Pay Commission scales, the madrasa teachers’ salary should be on par with the school teachers as theirs is a much heavier teaching schedule. While the school teachers are relieved in the afternoon, the madrasa teachers’ work is quite laborious and cumbersome; therefore, these madrasa pedagogues must be handed a handsome salary.
Advocate Tibah Siddiqu1
There are about 50,000 teachers employed in about 10,000 plus madrasas registered under SPQEM. A point to be noted is that the NITI Ayog is responsible to handover a grant of around Rs 720 crore to the madrasas. Recently, the amount was even increased; however, for the previous three years, nothing has been released.
In 2008-09, a special project for quality education of madrasas was introduced by the central government, providing for the employment of teachers in modern subjects like the sciences, mathematics, English and Hindi, in addition of their religious curriculum, Dars-e-Nizami which has Fiqueh (jurisprudence), Hadis, Ilm-ul-Kalam (metaphysics), Sarf-o-Nehv (grammar), Tafsir (interpretation), Hifz-ul-Quran (Quran memorizing), Khattati (calligraphy) etc. 
The Central Government had introduced SPQEM for the disbursement of funds for the madrasas in 2009. Truth is that the poor madrasas, spread all over India, cater to a huge populace of Muslim community since these students can’t cater to what to talk of elite education but even normal government schools. Another reason why these Muslim students get left behind is that they hardly have any connection or resources to get admission or afford to study at public or English medium schools.
SPQEM, in its recommendations, had provided a salary of Rs 12,000 for postgraduate teachers and Rs 6,000 for graduate teachers. A sum of Rs 50,000 was assigned for the library while Rs 1 lakh was to be given for computers as one time grant. For TLMs (Teaching Learning Materials), Rs 15,000 were assigned. Unfortunately, for the last 3 years, nothing has been given to these underprivileged and deprived institutions of learning.
Firoz Bakht Ahmed
There are about 50,000 teachers employed in about 10,000 plus madrasas registered under SPQEM. Niti Ayog, the successor of the Planning Commission, is responsible to handover a grant of around Rs 720 crore to the madrasas. Recently, the amount was even increased; however, for the previous three years, nothing is released. It will be very sad if the madrasa modernization programme, is annihilated owing to the non-availability of funds.
According to social activist cum constitutional expert, Atyab Siddiqui, it was highly commendable on the part of the Supreme Court to have taken note of the madrasas’ pathetic educational facilities and the blatant neglect meted out to the poor institutions catering to poorest of the poor sections of Indian society. He added, “If the Muslims of India will remain educationally backward, the country cannot develop as well.”
---
*Chancellor, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights. 

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”