Skip to main content

National TUs' betrayal? Birla-Century workers seek coop ownership

Counterview Desk
Well-known civil rights organization, Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), which claims to have championed the cause of 900 protesting workers of the Birlas-owned Century mills in Madhya Pradesh, has taken strong objection to established unions such as INTUC (Congress), AITUC (CPI) and Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (BJP) for failing to consult the workers in agreeing to choose the option of voluntary retirement scheme (VRS), one of the three offered by the Birlas.
Seeking wider support, an appeal signed by NBA leader Medha Patkar and others on Century workers’ year-long struggle says that most of the workers prefer to run the Mills as a workers’ cooperative, which also happens to be an option offered by the Birlas.

Text of the appeal:

It was exactly an year ago, on October 17, 2017, that more than 900 workers of Century Yarn & Century Denim Mills, located at village Santrati, district Khargone, in Madhya Pradesh adjacent to the Mumbai-Indore (to Agra) national highway, walked out of the factory premises owned and managed by Kumarmangalam Birla group’s Century Textiles & Industries Ltd. They refused to join Wearit Global Ltd, a corporate from Kolkata to whom Birlas claimed to have sold the mills with 84 acres of land, buildings, machinery etc. for a meager price of Rs 2.5 crore.
The workers were upset with the sale also because it took place hardly five days after a written commitment was signed by all, the authorized managers, revenue and labour officer, as well as police official. The agreement was a result of a peaceful sit-in by workers, once they came to know about the likely transfer or sale on August 17, 2017. The promise was about Century to run the mills or to pay the voluntary retirement scheme (VRS) as per the government rules.
However, the mills were ‘sold’ without due process of law, and hence the Industrial Tribunal passed two orders, the first one declaring the Business Transfer Agreement (BTA) to be ‘ingenuine’ and the second order (May 17, 2018) cancelling the BTA. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh also upheld the Industrial Tribunal’s conclusion regarding under estimation of value of the property as well as non-payment of stamp fee!
The courts also agreed with the workers that they were never on strike. On the other hand, they have been awaiting the Mills to be opened and work to be started. The companies lost the battle on this count too and hence the payment of wages has been on from May 2018 onwards till date to the Satyagrahi workers sitting outside the campus and staff, who are inside but without any work.
They all are, however, in disagreement with the Birlas not paying them the salaries for six and half months from October to April 2018 and the arrears as per the agreement in 2012. A relay fast is on in this issue since last 100 days, at the Satygraha Sthal, the company gate while the Labour Commissioner’s orders too are yet not fully complied with by Century-Birlas and the legal battle is on before the Industrial Tribunal, too.
It was in this context that the Birla management initiated a dialogue with the struggling workers and staff members after May 2018. The workers, who approached Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), requesting us to guide and support them in October 2017, were frustrated with the Unions including Indian National Trade Union Congress (INTUC), All-India Trade Union Congress (AITUC), Century Ekta Union and Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS).
Yet NBA insisted on taking them along. In their name, the legal proceeding were carried forward while all the workers unitedly participated in mass action to legal action and myself too pleaded before the Labor Commissioner as well as the Industrial Tribunal, whenever needed.
The options put forth by Birlas were three:
  1. VRS to be paid as compensation for the lost job which was after much debate and deliberations was settled on 35:25 days salary for each year of past service and future years till retirement age. The Birlas refused to consider any higher amount as according to them, they are making a favour even when there are no rules for private companies to do so. 
  2. That the Century mills would be transferred for Re 1 without any liability to the workers’ cooperative or any entity and they could run the same and do whatever with the property. 
  3. Third was that Birlas would again sell it to some other company…. following the “due process” of law(?) 
We all have worked very hard on the second option, preparing ourselves to run the mills, seeking support and advice from experts, traders, bankers, etc., and are about to reach the final stage of registering a proper legal entity and signing the agreement with Birlas-Century.
However, there was a sudden blow when we found that all trade unions (the so-called authorized ones) have unitedly passed a resolution favouring VRS i.e ‘Cash, Not the Mills’. This is signed by a handful of their office bearers, while more than 90 percent of workers and 40 percent of staff have made their notarized affidavits about the choice of the option to run the Mills.
The unions uniting beyond party lines, i.e. AITUC, INTUC, BMS and independent internal union, have certainly not even consulted the workers or staff nor have they thought it necessary to take a pro-worker position. They have not even taken in the workers as their members and yet they act as the ‘authorized’, against the wishes of the majority workers! They were with us in deliberations throughout and accepted going for whichever option the workers would select with us, the core representatives.
Can you imagine the Birlas avoiding a reply or response to the letters by representative group large number of workers? They cannot, and they should not, being fair, just and following the law.
The workers and the committed staff take it up as a challenge and have asked the Century to deal with and bring a settlement with the workers’ force, and not the Unions without united strength. During the celebration of the first anniversary of struggle, on October 17, we have issued a public notice to Birlas, “Hold discussions with us within 72 hours or the agitation will be further intensified for sure”.
Workers, with women and children, who too have been a part of the struggle for rightful alternative, over a year, have warned Century “not to back out from the offer”. They have been given October 31 as the deadline for the option to be chosen, that too by the Unions through their letter dated October 15. We have put up the banner saying: “These mills and resources belong to the workers and staff of Century Mills as a source for employment”.
The workers opt for becoming owners of the mills, which contributed to the nation and the company’s wealth with their toil over 25 full years, changing and challenging the present system!
Be with us! Do whatever you can please!
  • Write and appeal to the Unions like AITUC and INTUC to follow the workers’ wishes. 
  • Help us raise working capital worth crores through millions of workers and supporters across the country. 
  • Come forward to support the challenging task as professionals, experts, financiers, lawyers and co-strugglers. 
  • Do send your suggestions, visionary inputs, in this unique move forward, with due urgency.
  • Write to century.narmada@gmail.com.

Comments

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Did Modi own, buy digital camera costing Rs 7 lakh in 1987-88, also used email?

Counterview Desk
In an interview to the news channel News Nation, aired on Saturday last, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declaring that he had approved the air strike despite bad weather because he felt the clouds would hide Indian planes from Pakistani radar is known to have become a laughing stock across India.

When a neo-nationalist "invaded" hijab clad ladies, Bengali looking scholar in Delhi metro

By Aditi Kundu*
Travelling in Delhi metro on a daily basis to commute from Mayur Vihar to Dwarka, I see diverse people everyday. One can hear them talk about different aspects of life, from kitchen pilitics to national politics. On the morning of May 13, I witnessed a strange incident; disturbing and amusing at the same time.

Terror attacks: Difference in public reactions in India, those in Colombo, Christchurch

By Battini Rao*
Recently, on April 20 during Easter Sunday, more than 250 people were killed in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in churches and hotels in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Local Islamic organisations Thawheed Jamath (NJT) and Jamathei Milathu Ibrahim (JMI) are held responsible for the attack. Islamic State has also claimed responsibility.

Women lost 88 lakh jobs in 2018: Why Modi "failed" to address their disempowerment?

Counterview Desk
Five human rights leaders Anjali Bhardwaj, Shabnam Hashmi, Purnima Gupta, Dipta Bhog, and Amrita Johri of the Women March for Change have posed 56 questions (alluding to Modi’s claim of 56 inches chest) to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP against the backdrop of his interview with a Bollywood star, which was allegedly masqueraded as a “non-political” conversation.

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

Disproportionately high death sentences against Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims: UN told

Counterview Desk
In their joint submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee to meet for the listing of adoption of list of issues at its 126th session, July 1-26, 2019, top Dalit rights organizations have taken strong exception to, among other things, "disproportional application of death sentencing by the judiciary of minorities, such as Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis".

Ex-IAS, IPS, IFS officers tell Modi: Pragya Thakur doesn't represent India's rich heritage

Counterview Desk
In an open statement, a group of former civil servants have said that normally they would have dismissed the candidature of Pragya Thakur, who is BJP’s choice for the Bhopal Lok Sabha constituency, as an act of political expediency. However, they were forced to react to her candidature after none other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi termed has as a “symbol of our civilisational heritage.”

India's 80% construction sites "unsafe", deaths 20 times higher than those in Britain

By Rajiv Shah
The Government of India may be seeking to project India’s construction sector as the country’s second-largest employer of the country after agriculture, providing jobs to more than 44 million people, and contributing nearly 9% to the national GDP, yet, ironically, its workforce is more unprotected than any other industrial sector of the country. Data suggest that the possibility of a fatality is five times more likely in the construction industry  than in a manufacturing industry, and the risk of a major injury is 2.5 times higher.

India sans Modi preferable, Congress worthier recipient of Indians’ votes: The Economist

By Our Representative
In a strongly-worded and crucial commentary on Prime Minister Narendra Modi as the electoral political battle is on, influential British weekly “The Economist”, has declared that “Indians, who are in the midst of voting in a fresh election, would be better off with a different leader”, even as pointing out that that under Modi, “India’s ruling party poses a threat to democracy.”