Skip to main content

Haridwar Professor-Swami's death was "mob lynching", state-sponsored "killing"

By Sandeep Pandey, Lubna Sarwath, Gurumoorthy M*
Whether it was a slightly high dose of Potassium at the All-Indian Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) at Rishikesh which ultimately caused cardiac arrest or deliberate neglect by the government over 112 days of fast-unto-death to demand a law for conservation of Ganga by Professor Guru Das Agrawal turned Swami Sanand, the Central government, and especially the Prime Minister, will be held responsible for his death. Matre Sadan, the ashram in Haridwar where Prof Agrawal fasted, has accused the government of murder by poisoning him.
A 2011 case of murder by poisoning of Swami Nigmanand, a young hermit also associated with Matre Sadan, who fasted for 115 days against illegal sand mining in Ganga, is pending in the court.
Prof Agrawal had forewarned the government about his fast by writing to the Prime Minister twice and then again wrote to him twice during the fast. The Prime Minister, otherwise known to open his mind regularly in public broadcasts known as 'Man ki Baat,' chose not to respond, until after Prof Agrawal's death when he tweeted a condolence.
The Piime Minister has similarly maintained silence on critical issues like violence against Muslims, Dalits and Me Too campaign.
The governments play the trick of making an accused out of a victim to politically coverup, and it has become more of a wont under the present Bhartiya Janta Party government in power. Some unknown person is being accused by the authorities of not letting Prof Agrawal give up his fast.
Those who know Prof Agrawal well are aware of his steely resolve. He would tell his well wishers during the marathon fast, “Worry about Ganga, not about me.” He had chosen the beginning of his fast on Ganga Dussehra, giving up water on the first day of Navratra and predicted his demise before Vijayadashmi. As a true scientist he even planned his death meticulously.
The government by accusing Prof Agrawal of continuing his fast under duress wants to divert attention from the main demands that he was making of the government: to enact a law for conservation of Ganga, to halt all hydroelectric projects on it, to ban mining and deforestation activities in its vicinity and to form a council consisting of people sensitive to Ganga to oversee its interest.
It was too embarrassing for the government whose Prime Minister contested his parliamentary election from Varanasi declaring that he got a call from mother Ganga, which altered the name of Water Resources ministry to include Ganga Rejuvenation in it, which committed to clean Ganga by 2019 and then revised the deadline to 2020, which has already spent 23% of the sanctioned Rs 23,323 crore budget for the purpose, to admit that the health of Ganga has worsened instead of improving during its regime and therefore Prof Agrawal was forced to go on fast.
Whereas the country and the world is witnessing horrific protests, which received a stamp of approval by chief of Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS), the ideological parent of ruling BJP, against the entry of women of all ages to Sabarimala temple in Kerala, which has been facilitated by an order of the Supreme Court, eerie silence of the cadres of Hindutva organisations, with proclivity for various degrees of militancy and who leave no opportunity of exploiting people's religious sentiments, on the issue of protecting Ganga being raised by Prof Agrawal exposes the true nature of right wing organisations.
It is clear that politics of polarisation takes precedence over religious-cultural-nationalism issues. RSS has various weapons in its arsenal. This time it chose ostracism of Prof Agrawal on a mass scale and hence it was mob lynching by adopting stoic silence and managing the media so that Prof Agrawal's fast isn't highlighted.
Compare the mass hysteria created by Anna Hazare's short fasts a few years back in which RSS played a role to build it up to conspicuously absent response from anywhere in the country to Prof Agrawal's long fast. Was Prof Agrawal raising an issue less important than corruption? Corruption can probably be fixed more easily than the damage to environment being caused by our developmental policies.
The support to a retrogressive stand on Sabarimala temple entry by RSS-BJP is shameful as is their insensitivity towards a progressive issue of Ganga rejuvenation. Even though RSS chief has vehemently resented that it is always Hindus who face persecution, the BJP should answer why Muslim women were chosen for 'equality' through an ordinance which jails husbands on a civil matrimonial issue of triple talaq while denying equality to Hindu women who laid fundamental rights claim to visit the Sabarimala temple?
Prof  Agrawal was an extraordinary scholar not just in modern sense of knowledge but also in the traditional sense of wisdom. On top of it he was a saint, in true sense, not the kind whose sectarian outlook exacerbates religious polarisation in society, resulting in strife. In fact, Prof Agrawal was against exhibitionist tendencies of religion. The death of such a saintly figure is going to cost the government dear. The saints of Matre Sadan have decided to continue the struggle of Prof Agrawal by resorting to fasting from 24 October, 2018.
The outlook of Prof Agrawal was at variance with that of government, because of which no reconciliation was possible. As an example on a copy of the draft 'The National River Ganga (Rejuvenation, Protection and Management) Bill, 2018, prepared by the government which was given to him during his fast by Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Director General of National Mission for Clean Ganga, for his comments he changed the sentence 'Parliament declared it expedient and in larger public interest to take control for prevention, control, abatement of pollution and rejuvenation of river Ganga,' to 'Parliament declared it expedient and in larger public interest to lay down the responsibility for maintaining desirable flows and water, sediment and ecological quality and thus rejuvenation of river Ganga.'
The government has conceived of a 'Ganga Protection Corps' as an armed forces which shall follow the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for the purpose of enforcement, rejuvenation, protection and management of river Ganga under the proposed Act treating offence punishable as cognizable and non-bailable.
Prof Agrawal on the contrary wanted people sensitive to and with a deep understanding about Ganga to form a council which would take responsibility for protection of the river. It has been alleged that Prof Agrawal wanted a religious body to decide on how Ganga ought to be taken care of. This is not true.
He wanted a 20 member Ganga Bhakta ('Devotee') Parishad, provisionally till June 2019, to be nominated by the Prime Minister, who were to take an oath standing in waters of Ganga to act in its interest. He nowhere said that these 20 people have to be necessarily religious.
In fact, Prof Agrawal didn't want pliant bureaucrats, working to commercially exploit Ganga in nexus with their political masters, to be heading the body to take care of Ganga's interest. In less than five years head of NMCG has been changed seven times. Prof Agrawal wanted an Indian Institute of Technology kind of autonomy for this supreme body on Ganga. Government's approach is bureaucratic and it wants to protect Ganga by policing. Prof Agrawal's outlook was humane and ecological and he wanted to protect Ganga by people's participation.
---
*Contacts: ashaashram@yahoo.com , sarwath.lubna@gmail.com, mguru.aid@gmail.com

Comments

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Did Modi own, buy digital camera costing Rs 7 lakh in 1987-88, also used email?

Counterview Desk
In an interview to the news channel News Nation, aired on Saturday last, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declaring that he had approved the air strike despite bad weather because he felt the clouds would hide Indian planes from Pakistani radar is known to have become a laughing stock across India.

When a neo-nationalist "invaded" hijab clad ladies, Bengali looking scholar in Delhi metro

By Aditi Kundu*
Travelling in Delhi metro on a daily basis to commute from Mayur Vihar to Dwarka, I see diverse people everyday. One can hear them talk about different aspects of life, from kitchen pilitics to national politics. On the morning of May 13, I witnessed a strange incident; disturbing and amusing at the same time.

Terror attacks: Difference in public reactions in India, those in Colombo, Christchurch

By Battini Rao*
Recently, on April 20 during Easter Sunday, more than 250 people were killed in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in churches and hotels in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Local Islamic organisations Thawheed Jamath (NJT) and Jamathei Milathu Ibrahim (JMI) are held responsible for the attack. Islamic State has also claimed responsibility.

Women lost 88 lakh jobs in 2018: Why Modi "failed" to address their disempowerment?

Counterview Desk
Five human rights leaders Anjali Bhardwaj, Shabnam Hashmi, Purnima Gupta, Dipta Bhog, and Amrita Johri of the Women March for Change have posed 56 questions (alluding to Modi’s claim of 56 inches chest) to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP against the backdrop of his interview with a Bollywood star, which was allegedly masqueraded as a “non-political” conversation.

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

Disproportionately high death sentences against Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims: UN told

Counterview Desk
In their joint submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee to meet for the listing of adoption of list of issues at its 126th session, July 1-26, 2019, top Dalit rights organizations have taken strong exception to, among other things, "disproportional application of death sentencing by the judiciary of minorities, such as Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis".

Ex-IAS, IPS, IFS officers tell Modi: Pragya Thakur doesn't represent India's rich heritage

Counterview Desk
In an open statement, a group of former civil servants have said that normally they would have dismissed the candidature of Pragya Thakur, who is BJP’s choice for the Bhopal Lok Sabha constituency, as an act of political expediency. However, they were forced to react to her candidature after none other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi termed has as a “symbol of our civilisational heritage.”

India's 80% construction sites "unsafe", deaths 20 times higher than those in Britain

By Rajiv Shah
The Government of India may be seeking to project India’s construction sector as the country’s second-largest employer of the country after agriculture, providing jobs to more than 44 million people, and contributing nearly 9% to the national GDP, yet, ironically, its workforce is more unprotected than any other industrial sector of the country. Data suggest that the possibility of a fatality is five times more likely in the construction industry  than in a manufacturing industry, and the risk of a major injury is 2.5 times higher.

India sans Modi preferable, Congress worthier recipient of Indians’ votes: The Economist

By Our Representative
In a strongly-worded and crucial commentary on Prime Minister Narendra Modi as the electoral political battle is on, influential British weekly “The Economist”, has declared that “Indians, who are in the midst of voting in a fresh election, would be better off with a different leader”, even as pointing out that that under Modi, “India’s ruling party poses a threat to democracy.”