Skip to main content

Modi's "Hindu" economics: Development sans investment? Calling bluff from officially-released facts

By Hemantkumar Shah*
Capital investment is essential for development. Production, and thereby national and people's income, increase when small and big companies and enterprises make investment. Yet the fact is, under the Modi regime capital investment is not going up.
In 2016-17 Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF), that is investment in machinery, was 28.5% of national income, i.e. GDP. It remained at the same level in 2017-18.
After Modi came to power, the base year for this calculation was changed to 2011-12. With that base year, the Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR) of GFCF during two year period of 2012-14 was 11.20%.
With the previous base year of 2004-05, for the eight-year period of 2004-12, the AAGR of GFCF remained at 20.57%. If we take in to account the 10-year period, it works out to 15.88%.
During the Modi regime of four years, 2014-18, the AAGR of GFCF was just 2.09%. In 2016-17, it reduced by 6.13%! It was Rs. 40.03 lakh crore in the previous year and reduced to 37.98 lakh crore in 2016-17!
These figures show that the Modi government has failed in attracting small or big, Indian or foreign investment in the country.
Is this Modi's Hindu economics? Clearly, the claim of Modi government is wrong when he says that in 60 years nothing has been done and only he is developing India.

Foreign direct investment

It is claimed that Narendra Modi successfully attracted foreign investment in India by touring various countries in the world during last four years. This is another great bluff. Let us examine the facts:
The 2006-07 year was a watershed year for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in India, when FDi went up by 2.5 times of the previous year. Since then it went up continuously.
The above table shows that the AAGR was highest during 2004-14 period in the 21st century. During Modi's regime it was reduced to an almost half of it, and it went further down to 8% in 2016-17 and mere 3% last year.
This simply means that foreign companies do not see India as an attractive destination for investment under Modi regime.

Rupee's decay

During the 2014 Lok Sabha elections campaign, it was claimed that the Indian rupee will be brought to level of 40 with respect to one US$, if Modi comes to power. It has now been proved beyond any doubt that it was a bluff par excellence, propagated by Modi himself and his bhakts.
When Modi assumed power on May 26, 2014, the exchange rate was Rs. 58.73. On June 28, 2018, it was Rs 69.10. Thus, average annual rate of depreciation works out to be 4.41%.
The exchange rate was Rs. 45.32 in 2004. Thus, the average annual rate of depreciation of value of Indian Rupee was 2.96 % for the 10-year rule of Manmohan Singh.
It shows that Indian Rupee has been comparatively devalued with higher speed in last four years of the Modi raj!
(Sources: Reserve Bank of India; A note dated 31-05-2018, published by the Department of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India; Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Government of India)
---
*Professor of economics, Gujarat University

Comments

TRENDING

India’s climate tech ecosystem in dire need of both early, growth-stage funding: Report

By Our Representative India’s climate tech ecosystem, which boasts over 800 startups, is in dire need of both early and growth-stage funding to leverage its full potential, according to a report by Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (Ventures) and MUFG Bank , Japan. Despite a robust initial funding landscape, with approximately two-thirds of climate tech startups receiving seed capital, growth-stage investments remain critically lacking. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

UNEP report on how climate crisis is impacting displacement, global conflicts, declining health

By Shankar Sharma*  A recent report by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), titled "A Global Foresight Report on Planetary Health and Human Wellbeing," warrants urgent attention from our country’s developmental perspective. The findings, detailed in the report, should be a source of significant concern not only globally but especially for our nation, which has a vast population and limited natural resources. 

Industries fueling climate crisis draining public funds in Global South: ActionAid

By Our Representative  A new ActionAid report has exposed the alarming financial drain on the Global South, as climate-wrecking industries like fossil fuels and industrial agriculture receive over US$600 billion annually in public subsidies. The report, "How the Finance Flows: Corporate Capture of Public Finance Fuelling the Climate Crisis in the Global South", reveals that an average of US$677 billion in public finance is directed toward climate-destructive sectors each year, depriving crucial social sectors such as education. 

75 years of revolution: How China moved away from ideals of struggle for human liberation

By Harsh Thakor*  On October 1st, we celebrate the 75th anniversary of the Chinese Revolution, a pivotal moment in the struggle for human liberation. From 1949 to 1976, China achieved remarkable social equality and revolutionary democracy, outpacing other developing nations in literacy, health care, agricultural output, and industrial production. 

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.

Overcoming extreme backwardness 75 yrs ago, China has 'risen to 2nd largest economy of the world'

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  On October 1, 1949, the revolutionary people of China established the People’s Republic of China (PRC) under the leadership of the Communist Party of China (CPC) by defeating Western imperialism, Japanese colonialism, and Chinese feudal warlords who unleashed a ‘white terror’ on Chinese people, communists and revolutionaries.