Skip to main content

Civil society, Opposition plan anti-saffron "Chalo Lucknow" show on May 10,160th anniversary of 1857 revolt

The 1857 Siege of Lucknow, as seen by Thomas Jones Barker
By Our Representative
Several civil society organizations, in alliance with opposition parties, such as Congress, Samajwadi Party, Bahujan Samaj Party, the two Communist parties, Rashtriya Janata Dal, and Janata Dal (United) are likely to come together for a show of unity against saffornization on May 10 in Lucknow to commemorate the 160th anniversary of the First War of Indian Independence of 1857.
The decision of the programme, likely to begin on May 5, culminating into a rally on May 10, was taken recently at a civil society meeting in Delhi, where activists agreed that it was necessary to break the alleged apathy towards the manner in which hardline Hindutva votaries are taking over reins of power in the country, as seen in Uttar Pradesh slipping in the hands of Yogi Adityanath.
The meeting decided, to quote one of the participants, to “give a clarion call that recalls the glorious days of the First War of Indian Independence and reaffirms resolve to fight to preserve and save India and Indians and the values enshrined in the Indian Constitution against oppression of all forms.”
Prominent persons who participated in the meeting, which took place after holding consultations with political leaders, included well-known intellectuals and social activists Apoorvanand, Harsh Mander, social activists Jaya Sharma, Sehba Farooqui, Maimoonah Mollah, MJ Vijayan, Avijit, Rajeswari Raina, Madhuresh Kumar, Zakir Husain, Shabnam Hashmi, and others.
The meeting was told that top social activist Teesta Setalvad has already held discussions with civil society activists regarding planning of the programme, which would be called “Lucknow Chalo”, in different cities, including Lucknow, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Patna, Saharanpur, Kolkata, etc.
The political leaders contacted included Sharad Yadav (JD-U), Sitaram Yechury (CPM), Ahmed Patel and Raj Babbar (Congress), Sudhindra Bhadoria (BSP) and Ghanshyam Tiwari (SP), and Manoj Jha (RJD). While CPM, JDU, RJD and Congress agreed to participate, SP and BSP said they would get back after talking to their leaders.
Setalvad separately held consultations with civil society organizations such as Bhoomi Adhikar Andolan, National Alliance of People’s Movements, National Committee on Dalit Human Rights, Saajhi Duniya, Uttar Pradesh Jan Manch, Bana Rahe Banaras, Savitribai Phule Samiti, National Trade Union of India, Quraishi Jamaat, Safai Karamchari Union, and others.
The programme in Lucknow is likely to begin on May 5, and would include seminars and cultural events on issues such as including defence of rights, breaking the silence, silence of the majority community, attack on Muslims, attack on the rule of law, subjugation of minorities, attacking young couples, attack on the idea of India, freedom of speech, constitution, democracy, and women.
During the meeting, Apoorvanand, professor of Hindi literature at the Delhi University, said, “We must say loudly that Muslims are being attacked and it’s not acceptable. Participation of Muslim groups is a must.”
Harsh Mandar, bureaucrat-turned-activist, added, “There is silence of the majority, some are with them, some apathetic and some afraid, and majority must break this silence.”
Farmers’ leader Vijayan said the focus should be to Talibanisation of India, with emphasis on how the RSS wants to break and divide India.” The meeting decided that there should be gathering on the last day, May 9, with the participation of 5,000 people, as it is “important to break the silence and atmosphere of fear.”
The slogans discussed sought to address issues such as how “goon squads were taking law unto their own hands, killing in the name of what one eats and what one wears; lynching fellow Indians because of what they trade and eat; and attacking young men and women because they choose to be friends, or enter into relationships”, said a source.
It was decided that the Lucknow programme would pledge “resolved to ensure that there is justice for all, social, economic and political; liberty of thought, expression, faith, belief and worship; equality of status and opportunity; and above all to promote a sense of fraternity that assures the dignity of the individual.”

Comments

TRENDING

Green revolution "not sustainable", Bt cotton a failure in India: MS Swaminathan

Counterview Desk
In a recent paper in the journal “Current Science”, distinguished scientist PC Kesaven and his colleague MS Swaminathan, widely regarded as the father of the Green Revolution, have argued that Bt insecticidal cotton, widely regarded as the continuation of the Green Revolution, has been a failure in India and has not provided livelihood security for mainly resource-poor, small and marginal farmers.
Sharply taking on Green Revolution, the authors say, it has not been sustainable largely because of adverse environmental and social impacts, insisting on the need to move away from the simplistic output-yield paradigm that dominates much thinking. Seeking to address the concerns about local food security and sovereignty as well as on-farm and off-farm social and ecological issues associated with the Green Revolution, they argue in favour of what they call sustainable ‘Evergreen Revolution’, based on a ‘systems approach’ and ‘ecoagriculture’.
Pointing out that Evergreen Revol…

Rejoinder: Inescapable to have Central Water Commission as strong technical body in India

By BN Navalawala*
This is with reference to Counterview Blog (December 5, 2018), "Modi govt 'shelves' water reforms report, shows 'no interest' in its recommendations", below mentioned are my comments/observations thereon:
A committee was constituted under the Chairmanship of Dr. Mihir Shah, Former Member, Planning Commission, for restructuring of Central Water Commission (CWC) and Central Ground Water Board (CGWB) for optimal development of water resources in the country in the backdrop of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM).

Some Hindu bodies in US defending BJP-RSS' divisive, violent activities: Agnivesh

Counterview Desk Last week, Washington DC saw speakers at a religious freedom roundtable, chaired by the US Ambassador for Religious Freedom, Sam Brownback, express concern over "eroding" space for religious freedom in India. Dr Mike Ghouse, executive director, of the Center for Pluralism in Washington DC, referring to the roundtable, said in an email alert that Indian-Americans have "a moral duty to prevent India from being labeled as a Country of Particular Concern by the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF)".

Karnataka: NGO Akshay Patra "not sensitive" to nutrition demands of school children

Counterview Desk
Well-known civil rights organizations, Right to Food Campaign and Jan Swasthya Abhiyan, have sent a letter to the Union minister of human resource development, the Chief Minister of Karnataka, other concerned ministers and officials of the state expressing concerns regarding the mid-day meal (MDM) to school children, insisting, all contracts to the Akshay Patra for supply of MDM should be immediately terminated.

Preventing childhood deaths: India performs worse than Bangladesh, "equals" Pakistan

By Rajiv Shah
A just-released study, “The Pneumonia and Diarrhea Progress Report 2018”, prepared by the International Vaccine Access Centre (IVAC) at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, has identified India among 15 other countries which are still far off the mark in achieving the targets of the Global Action Plan for the Prevention of Pneumonia and Diarrhea (GAPPD).

Rejoinder: Worldwide anxiety post-Fukishima is fading, slowly and steadily

By Dr KS Parthasarathy* 
EAS Sarma, former Secretary, Government of India (GoI) in a letter addressed to Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), GoI, stated that, there has been "worldwide anxiety about the consequences of catastrophic nuclear accidents, either due to manual lapses or natural calamities" (Counterview, December 2, 2018)."In the recent years, globally, the pace of growth of nuclear power has escalated in leaps and bounds, causing a great deal of public concern and apprehension."

India's rewritten textbooks talk of demerits of democracy, praise Hitler, underrate Mughals

Counterview Desk
A detailed, 3,800-word review of the books rewritten under directions of the BJP rulers across India since Prime Minister Narendra Modi came to power in May 2014 has suggested that one of aims of the books is to instill a sense of doubt about India’s democratic polity among the country’s young minds. Reviewed in the prestigious US journal, “The New York Review of Books”, in its latest issue (December 6, 2018) by Alex Traub, the scrutiny insists, the effort has also been to paint Indian history from the angle of “Hindu triumphalism”, even as creating “Islamophobia”.

Four children die after poor UP Dalit, Muslim families forced to flee to forest area: PVCHR

Counterview Desk
Peoples’ Vigilance Committee on Human Rights (PVCHR) has said that the forest department police’s crackdown, allegedly without any prior notice, on Dalit and Muslim households in Dakhin Tola, Churk Bazaar, Sonbhadra district, Uttar Pradesh, beating up “children and old people, women, and men in an inhuman way”, has led to “forced displacement, starvation and discrimination”. This has reportedly affected about 350 people.

Modi's PRO, who served previous Congress, BJP CMs in Gujarat with "equal" competence

By Rajiv Shah
A public relations officer (PRO), even as maintaining anonymity, is supposed to “manage” reputation of his or her client, reflecting the client’s views in order to influence opinion and behaviour. A PRO is also known to use, the world over, media and communication to build, maintain, manage and plan publicity strategies and campaigns, even as dealing with enquiries from the public, particularly media, organising promotional events such as press conferences, open days, exhibitions, tours and visits. A PRO is also supposed to final touches to press statements for his or client.

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.