Skip to main content

Modi govt has created climate to amend land Act as a developmental need: Medha Patkar-led NAPM

Medha Patkar
By Our Representative
The apex body of tens of people’s organizations across India, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) has termed the Narendra Modi government’s reported decision to come up with an amendment to water down the Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 in the form of an ordinance as nothing but an effort push an “anti-poor corporate agenda”. NAPM is led by top social activist Medha Patkar.
Regretting that the new Act “has not been fully implemented in earnest by either state governments, or the Central government,”, the NAPM has admitted, “A climate has been created by corporate houses and Modi Sarkaar that the new land Act is an impediment to the developmental needs of the country.”
Taking advantage of the situation, the NAPM has suggested, the Prime Minister’s Office believes that it cannot “wait”, and “it means business and for that they need to bring in Ordinances on crucial issues. It is on expected lines. Since the time NDA government has come to power, on various occasions its ministers Arun Jaitley, Nitin Gadkari, Piyush Goyal and others have advocated for bringing amendments to the new Act.”
Calling it an “Ambani-Adani sarkaar – a company sarkaar, which is out to sell the democratic rights of the people and democratic traditions of law making in Parliament in the name of business”, the statement said, “We all know that the new Act has been framed after consulting all the stakeholders and over a period of seven years after going through two parliamentary standing committees (2007 and 2009) headed by senior BJP leaders Kalyan Singh and Sumitra Mahajan.”
“Modi has displayed least patience for the parliamentary traditions and often remained silent on key issues concerning the nation and blamed opposition for non-functioning of Parliament”, the statement read, adding, “Matters concerning the lives of millions of the farmers in this country can't and shouldn't be decided by mere Ordinance. These are matters of grave importance and need thorough debate and discussion in this democracy.”
Saying that all this is happening in the same way as in Gujarat, the statement said, “In 2009, the Gujarat government under Modi had brought in an Ordinance to enact Special Investment Region Act, 2009. The Gujarat Special Investment Region Act was directly to facilitate large scale land acquisitions by developing 13 SIRs and four industrial areas centered on manufacturing.”
Saying that the 2013 land Act was enacted in “response to the Colonial Land Acquisition Act, 1894 which resulted in massive forcible land acquisition without any resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R), drastically affecting not only people who lose their land, but also those who lose their livelihood”, the NAPM said, “These forced land acquisitions led to massive protests in places like Nandigram, Singur, Kalinganagar, Kakrapalli, and Bhatta Parsaul, where many people died.”
It added, “For years, Narmada Bachao Andolan and Niyamgiri Suraksha Parishad led anti-SEZ protests in Raigarh and Jhajhar demanding a repeal of the colonial Act and enactment of a new development planning act marking people's participation and provisions for livelihood based R&R. Finally, we have an Act, passed by last Parliament, and rules for which have been notified by NDA government in August 2014.”
The statement said, “As per the Act, the government was to bring a Notification in the Parliament in year 2014 to extend the provisions of the compensation and R&R to the people affected by land acquisition carried through the 13 central Acts, as mentioned in Fourth Schedule. Rather than doing so, it is also proposing to make amendments to two of the key provisions, 'consent' and 'Social Impact Assessment' of the new Act. These two provisions are central to addressing the issue of 'forced land acquisition' and 'resulting impoverishment” to the communities.”
Declaring that “any move to amend the new Act will be opposed by people's movements”, the NAPM said, “20,000 people gathered on December 2 on the streets of Delhi, and we will mobilise against any forcible land acquisitions and attempts at making changes to the new act all over the country. We urge all the members of the opposition parties to intervene not let Modi Sarkaar get away with this anti people move.”

Comments

Anonymous said…
when modi and company are committed to industrialists and industrialists alone, not for the concerns of the comman man.people have to suffer for their mistake they have done by voting BJP.Media is also supporting the anti-social activities of BJP.God alone can save India!

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson". 

How retraints were imposed on academic freedom on the IIM-Ahmedabad campus

By Sandeep Pandey*  This is the seventh consecutive academic year when I would have gone as a visiting faculty member to the Indian Institute of Management at Ahmedabad to teach an Elective course on Transformational Social Movements to the second year of Post Graduate Programme students. But the invitation has not come so far and it looks like it is the end of my teaching stint at IIM, at least, so long as the Bhartiya Janata Party remains in power at the centre.