Skip to main content

Corporate fraud: 87% Indian CEOs warn of uncertainty amidst Modi's clean governance "promise"

By Jag Jivan*  
A top international consulting firm, Deloitte, involved in “a multi-skilled, multi-disciplined firm, offering clients a wide range of industry-focused business solutions”, has warned of sharp rise in fraud cases over the coming years. Suggesting that, with the rise of new business models backed by new technology, fraud has spawned new variants, a Deloitte report, “India Fraud Survey”, has said, around 56 per cent of 400-odd survey respondents, all of them chief executive officers from across India, believe that “fraud will continue to increase” in the two years, and another 31 per cent said they were “uncertain” about what may happen.
The report believes, the frauds will continue despite the fact that the new Narendra Modi government has “managed to improve business sentiment and is giving confidence to investors to make fresh investments across several key sectors such as infrastructure, manufacturing, retail, education, healthcare, and insurance.”
Even as claiming that the Modi government has also taken “a strong position on the perceived deterrents to investment and growth, such as bribery and corruption, and other unethical business practices, by promoting good governance and enacting legislations to curb such malpractices”, Deloitte says, the “stakeholders” are doubtful, and are “closely observing how these measures will translate into growth for the Indian economy.”
In fact, it believes, several of the laws enacted by the previous UPA government can become handy in the fight against fraud. These include “the Prevention of Corruption Amendment Act 2011, the new Companies Act, 2013, The Whistleblowers Protection Act, 2011, The Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI), The Information Technology Act 2000 (IT Act), and The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA).”
UK-based, with offices across eight major Indian cities, the Deloitte survey has found that financial services, real estate and infrastructure, and social/government sector were the “most vulnerable” to fraud, and three top frauds experienced by them were “diversion/ theft of funds/ goods, bribery and corruption, and regulatory non-compliance.” And who are the biggest fruadsters? The top firm notes, senior management was “identified as most susceptible to commit fraud, whereas external parties were least likely to commit fraud.”
Deloitte says, “Despite the extensive adoption of technology by organizations to build global business models, corporate India continues to face challenges in mitigating traditional fraud schemes… Over 50 percent of survey respondents felt that procurement, sales and distribution functions were most vulnerable to fraud, indicating that greater business exposure to external stakeholders such as vendors, suppliers, customers, and distributors could significantly increase the risk of fraud.”
Pointing out that most chief executive officers have “limited awareness about technology-led new frauds, report says, 69 per cent of the CEOs were “unsure” about “social media fraud risk”, as there felt there was” inadequate guidance in legislation to deal with it. Then, 60 per cent CEOs felt e-commerce was not risky, and “appeared not have comprehensive processes within their organizations to its mitigate.” Then, 96 per cent “claimed their organizations had not suffered cloud computing fraud”, and 57 per cent were “unaware of any review compliance and security policies pertaining to cloud computing.”
Providing its view on the matter, Deloitte says, there is, in fact, “insufficient mechanisms to prevent and detect fraud, as well as limited enforcement of internal controls”, and these are “likely to be the reasons that organizations continue to experience traditional fraud.” It regrets, corporate bodies have “considered bribery as the ‘cost of doing business’, and hence demonstrated a degree of acceptability towards this practice.”
The respondents were asked to rank, on a scale of six, which could be the best ways to prevent fraud. Deloitte found that an average rating of 3.7 out of 6 was received by whistleblowing hotline, 3.1 by statutory audit, 4.0 by internal audit review, 3.2 by accident, 3.5 by IT control. Deloitte said, “While organizations have made some investments towards mitigating the risk of fraud, the specific measures adopted appear insignificant in light of the requirements of the fast changing regulatory environment.”
---
*Freelance writer

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Nepal votes amid regional rivalry: Why New Delhi is watching closely

By Nava Thakuria*  As Nepal holds an early national election on Thursday (5 March 2026), the people of northeast India, along with other regional observers, are watching the proceedings closely. The vote was necessitated after the government of Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli collapsed in September 2025 following widespread anti-government protests. The election will determine the composition of the 275-member House of Representatives, originally scheduled for 2027, under the stewardship of an interim government led by former Supreme Court justice Sushila Karki.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.

From neglect to progress: The story of Ranavara’s community-led development

By Bharat Dogra   Visitors to Ranavara, a remote village in Kherwara block of Udaipur district, are often surprised by its multi-dimensional progress. The village today is known for its impressive school building, regenerated pastures, expanded tree cover, and extensive water conservation and supply works. These achievements are the outcome of sustained community efforts over several years, demonstrating how small, consistent initiatives can lead to significant change.