Skip to main content

Corporate fraud: 87% Indian CEOs warn of uncertainty amidst Modi's clean governance "promise"

By Jag Jivan 
A top international consulting firm, Deloitte, involved in “a multi-skilled, multi-disciplined firm, offering clients a wide range of industry-focused business solutions”, has warned of sharp rise in fraud cases over the coming years. Suggesting that, with the rise of new business models backed by new technology, fraud has spawned new variants, a Deloitte report, “India Fraud Survey”, has said, around 56 per cent of 400-odd survey respondents, all of them chief executive officers from across India, believe that “fraud will continue to increase” in the two years, and another 31 per cent said they were “uncertain” about what may happen.
The report believes, the frauds will continue despite the fact that the new Narendra Modi government has “managed to improve business sentiment and is giving confidence to investors to make fresh investments across several key sectors such as infrastructure, manufacturing, retail, education, healthcare, and insurance.”
Even as claiming that the Modi government has also taken “a strong position on the perceived deterrents to investment and growth, such as bribery and corruption, and other unethical business practices, by promoting good governance and enacting legislations to curb such malpractices”, Deloitte says, the “stakeholders” are doubtful, and are “closely observing how these measures will translate into growth for the Indian economy.”
In fact, it believes, several of the laws enacted by the previous UPA government can become handy in the fight against fraud. These include “the Prevention of Corruption Amendment Act 2011, the new Companies Act, 2013, The Whistleblowers Protection Act, 2011, The Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI), The Information Technology Act 2000 (IT Act), and The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA).”
UK-based, with offices across eight major Indian cities, the Deloitte survey has found that financial services, real estate and infrastructure, and social/government sector were the “most vulnerable” to fraud, and three top frauds experienced by them were “diversion/ theft of funds/ goods, bribery and corruption, and regulatory non-compliance.” And who are the biggest fruadsters? The top firm notes, senior management was “identified as most susceptible to commit fraud, whereas external parties were least likely to commit fraud.”
Deloitte says, “Despite the extensive adoption of technology by organizations to build global business models, corporate India continues to face challenges in mitigating traditional fraud schemes… Over 50 percent of survey respondents felt that procurement, sales and distribution functions were most vulnerable to fraud, indicating that greater business exposure to external stakeholders such as vendors, suppliers, customers, and distributors could significantly increase the risk of fraud.”
Pointing out that most chief executive officers have “limited awareness about technology-led new frauds, report says, 69 per cent of the CEOs were “unsure” about “social media fraud risk”, as there felt there was” inadequate guidance in legislation to deal with it. Then, 60 per cent CEOs felt e-commerce was not risky, and “appeared not have comprehensive processes within their organizations to its mitigate.” Then, 96 per cent “claimed their organizations had not suffered cloud computing fraud”, and 57 per cent were “unaware of any review compliance and security policies pertaining to cloud computing.”
Providing its view on the matter, Deloitte says, there is, in fact, “insufficient mechanisms to prevent and detect fraud, as well as limited enforcement of internal controls”, and these are “likely to be the reasons that organizations continue to experience traditional fraud.” It regrets, corporate bodies have “considered bribery as the ‘cost of doing business’, and hence demonstrated a degree of acceptability towards this practice.”
The respondents were asked to rank, on a scale of six, which could be the best ways to prevent fraud. Deloitte found that an average rating of 3.7 out of 6 was received by whistleblowing hotline, 3.1 by statutory audit, 4.0 by internal audit review, 3.2 by accident, 3.5 by IT control. Deloitte said, “While organizations have made some investments towards mitigating the risk of fraud, the specific measures adopted appear insignificant in light of the requirements of the fast changing regulatory environment.”

Comments

TRENDING

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative   A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram   In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

The Epstein shock, global power games and India’s foreign policy dilemma

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The “Epstein” tsunami has jolted establishments everywhere. Politicians, bureaucrats, billionaires, celebrities, intellectuals, academics, religious gurus, and preachers—all appear to be under scrutiny, even dismantled. At first glance, it may seem like a story cutting across left, right, centre, Democrats, Republicans, socialists, capitalists—every label one can think of. Much of it, of course, is gossip, as people seek solace in the possible inclusion of names they personally dislike. 

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Paper guarantees, real hardship: How budget 2026–27 abandons rural India

By Vikas Meshram   In the history of Indian democracy, the Union government’s annual budget has always carried great significance. However, the 2026–27 budget raises several alarming concerns for rural India. In particular, the vague provisions of the VBG–Ram Ji scheme and major changes to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) have put the future of rural workers at risk. A deeper reading of the budget reveals that these changes are not merely administrative but are closely tied to political and economic priorities that will have far-reaching consequences for millions of rural households.

Gujarat No 1 in Govt of India pushed report? Not in labour, infrastructure, economy

By Rajiv Shah A report by a top Delhi-based think tank, National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER), prepared under the direct leadership of Amitabh Kant, ex-secretary, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP), Government of India, has claims that Gujarat ranks No 1 in the NCAER State Investment Potential Index (N-SIPI), though there is a dig. N-SIPI has been divided into two separate indices. The first one includes five “pillars” based on which the index has been arrived it. These pillars are: labour, infrastructure, economic conditions, political stability and governance, and perceptions of a good business climate. It is called N-SIPI 21, as it includes a survey of 21 states out of 29.