Skip to main content

Put up boards barring Gujarat officials seeking to enter villages in Dholera SIR area: JAAG to farmers

Dholera region today
By Our Representative
The Jameen Adhikar Andolan Gujarat (JAAG), which is seeking to emerge as the apex body of people’s groups wanting to fight against the “anti-farmer” land acquisition policies in dozen-odd special investment regions (SIRs) of Gujarat, has decided to replicate the “successful”, “tried” and “time-tested” actions used against Mandal-Bechraji SIR in North Gujarat elsewhere, too. In a statement issued in Ahmedabad, JAAG said, which forced down the state government to scale down the Mandal-Bechraji SIR’s area from 44 to 36 villages, said, it will agitate against the Dholera SIR, being planned on 900 sq km area in Ahmedabad district off Gulf of Khambhat, in the same intensive way as it did in the North Gujarat SIR.
The programme of action it worked out at a recent meeting include passing a resolution in each of the Gram Panchayats, Gram Sabhas and the cooperative societies in the villages affected by the Dholera SIR; putting up boards at the entrance of each of the villages declaring the entire village’s opposition to the SIR and asking the authorities to not enter the village for any work related to the SIR; a motor-cycle rally through all the SIR-affected villages; affidavit by every landowner, landless labourer and pastoralist residing in the village to make an affidavit opposing the SIR; and a rally, if necessary, to Gandhinagar to submit them to the authorities.
A statement titled “Dholera SIR: Illusions being shattered”, signed by JAAG leader Sagar Rabari, said, “We have been hearing many things in connection with the Dholera SIR – that the farmers have already sold their lands, that agriculture is no longer affordable, that no one wants to pursue agriculture as an occupation, and so on and so forth. But when you meet them in the village, sit with them in the village square (choro) and talk to them with a sensitive ear then the real picture begins to emerge.”
JAAG’s statement comes amidst reports of “regret” (click HERE to read) being expressed among the rich farmers of Mandal-Bechraji SIR of the 36 villages, which were taken out of the SIR, for being part of the anti-SIR stir. They reportedly felt “cheated”, as their land prices fell drastically following the government decision to scale down the SIR. However, the land prices of the eight villages which continued to remain within the SIR reached a new height, reaching higher than that of the Sanand region where the Nano car has set up plant near. “They took part only to ensure a higher price of their land”, a senior activist complained.
Despite this, JAAG sounded bold, “A meeting was held in village Bawaliyari on December 22, 2013 to clarify issues regarding the Dholera SIR and they learnt many things which they had never heard from their political leaders of government officials. Their curiosity increased. Inquiries and phone calls from them were now unstoppable. Hence, a meeting at village Sodhi was organized. About 200 leaders of the Koli community from 12 villages gathered in Sodhi. The meeting was also attended by secretary of the Gujarat Khedut Samaj Jayesh Patel, Rameshbhai Patel and Koli leader from Navsari Davendrabhai”.
In an effort to suggest that in Dholera opposition to the SIR will pick up, JAAG said, “Jayeshbhai Patel explained the SIR Act, and in many place read out portions from the Act to make things clear. The people were truly shocked but the real shock was in store for us. One farmer had, at the environmental public hearing (EPH) of Dholera SIR on January 3, asked the Ahmedabad district collector: ‘With whose permission have you come here to develop us? Who has asked you to ‘develop’ us?’ These same people today told us: ‘We will die but we will not part with our land’.”
JAAG claimed, “We informed the SIR authorities, in writing, that we do not want the SIR but what they have reported to their higher ups is not known to us. Now if the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) gives it a go-ahead then we will fight it out. We warned them that all efforts to divide them on caste lines may be made, rumours of all kinds may be floated, political pressures may be brought to bear on you, false cases against you may be filed, arrests may be made, you may have to go to jail or face police atrocities. Now tell us, do you still want to save your lands? The farmers were unanimous – we will bear it all but we will save our lands.”
The statement asserted, “The meeting with the leaders also brought forth some of the issues, which more or less, is true everywhere. (a) The government officials and/or local leaders of the ruling party, in order to further their short-term gains, have given half-baked or entirely false information to the rural people; (b) caste-based divisions are entrenched in the villages resulting in a severe lack of mutual trust; and (c) there is a severe dearth of leaders who give correct information and represent the interests of the stakeholders in Gujarat (including in the state Assembly).”
This is the reason why, the statement said, “legislations like the SIR Act and the Irrigation and Drainage Act get enacted, and the Narmada command area gets de-commanded. People are kept in the dark about these major developments and so not a word of protest is heard, naturally. Only ‘the growth story of Gujarat’ can be heard everywhere. Nonetheless, there is a ray of hope and it is this that whenever the truth is told to the people, and they are made to understand the issue, they show a readiness to fight for the right cause.”

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson". 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.