Environmental public hearing for Dholera SIR "illegal" as it fails to address issues of climate change, say activists

By Our Representative
In a letter to the Union secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests (MEoF), two senior environmental activists, Rohit Prajapati and Krishnakant of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, Vadodara, have said that the environmental public hearing (EPH), on January 3, for the proposed special investment region (SIR) in Dholera region, situated south of Ahmedabad, “is illegal” and “anti-constitutional”, as it has failed to take into account issues of climate change, which will take place two to three decades from now, when the SIR will develop.
Dholera SIR has been envisaged on around 900 sq km of land, and is planned as a modern industrial township, by acquiring arable and non-arable land, 43 per cent of which belongs to the government, hence is part of common village property.
The activists have said, “Dholera SIR project’s substantial part -- phase III comprising 27% of the planned development -- is proposed to start after 20 years and may be completed after 30 years as mentioned by the promoters. The consultant has completely ignored the hard reality of climate change in the environmental impact assessment (EIA) for the project which will come up after 20 years. We want to know if there is any precedence of EIA being sought for such a project in the country before and how it was processed.”
They claimed, the consultants – Senes Consultants India Ltd – “do not have any experience and expertise to prepare such EIA”.
The activists have insisted, “The project is not single industry specific or even on the lines of the established industrial cluster and instead is an ambitious project that seeks to combine industries of different nature that will also have residential and commercial infrastructure build to support it.”
A copy of the letter has been sent to the chairman, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, and the chairman/ collector, Environment Public Hearing Committee of Ahmedabad district.
The activists say, “In the EPH for the Dholera SIR project’s substantial part of consent is sought from the present generation of villagers for a project that is envisioned to be completed after 20 years. In the process it overlooks completely the potential future stakeholders, the young generation. How will the developers take consent of the very young (now below 5 years and also below 18 years who will grow to be the decisive stake holders later) and the unborn? This is unconstitutional and violates the basic fundamental rights given under the Constitution of India.”
Then, the activists, say, “as per the information available presently there is no clarity on the kind of industries, their specifics like raw material, products, by-products, manufacturing process, its pollution load on the people, their livelihood, environment etc for the EIA hearing to take place as per the EIA notification. Such details and specifications should be provided well in advance.” Since this is not the case, the EPH stands “null and void”. After all, “it is difficult to assess the possible pollution load and other environmental impact due to lack of required essential details.
In fact, the activists point out, the EIA for the project is “based on the 2001 data instead of the latest census data available of 2011.” They underlined, “The updates could have been included as the EIA hearing is being held in 2014. We want to know why updated data has not been used for projections and its impact.” Then, as 43% of the land to be used for the project is government land, which is largely used as community resources for common use, “common resources and cannot give consent to use this land without consulting people whose life and livelihood will be affected by it.”
Coming the technical issues of the EIA report prepared by the consultants, the activists say, “There are serious discrepancies in the land and coastline details provided in the EIA hearing which can be easily ascertained. For instance, the water level as per the coastal regulatory zone (CRZ) norms shown is at variance with ground reality as that region which is depicted as land is actually the village and land submerged under sea long back. We demand that the EPH committee should visit the area with the people to verify the facts.”
They wonder, “How these discrepancies are not being taken into account and who should be held responsible for misleading with such blatant factual inaccuracies? Also, how can EIA be deemed legal if it is based on factual inaccuracies and misleading information?”
Then, the activists say, “The EIA stands incomplete and in violation of prescribed terms of reference (TOR) for EIA report.” Thus, TOR No 3 specifically asks to ‘examine the details of land use around 10 km radius of the project site. Analysis should be made based on the latest satellite imagery for land use with raw images.’ The explanation provided for TOR No 3 in chapter 4, section 4.4 and chapter 2, section 2.3, has only the images of the SIR area and not the surrounding 10 km. Details and analysis of the 10 km radius area is missing. It appears that this is deliberate”.

Comments

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

"Misleading" satellite images being shared on Balakot surgical strike on Jaish camp

By Dr Vinay Kate*
With every passing day more questions are being raised about the surgical strike India did in Balakot as a response to Pulwama attacks. So far the Indian media has claimed mass casulaty of 300+ terrorists of Jaish-e-Mohammad in this surgical strike, but there is hardly any report from foreign media about the same.

Extreme repression, corporate loot, cultural genocide "characterise" India's tribal belt

Counterview Desk
As Lok Sabha polls approach, there is considerable ferment in one section of the population -- India's Adivasis, forming about 8.6 per cent of India's population. Things became particularly critical following the February 14, 2019 Supreme Court order, allegedly seeking to evict lakhs of tribals from their forest lands.

Industry in India "barely growing", export growth 0%, whither moral anchors?

Counterview Desk
In a sharp critique of the Modi government, the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A), one of world renowned economist Prof Kaushik Basu, who is Professor of Economics and Carl Marks Professor of International Studies at Cornell University, has told students at the IIM-A’s 54th Annual Convocation on March 16, 2019 that they have a “special responsibility” on their shoulders, “the responsibility to reject narrow sectarianism, uphold scientific thinking, openness to new ideas, and freedom of speech.”

Gujarat model? Industrial effluents "invade" borewells, discharge coloured water in farms

By Rajiv Shah
In a major embarrassment for Gujarat model, of the 21 samples taken by officials of the state government's environmental watchdog Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) in two villages of Vadodara district and analyzed by its laboratory in Gandhinagar, the state capital, to find out pollution level in groundwater, 16 were assessed as highly contaminated – these were, in fact, found to be discharging reddish, brownish, reddish, or yellowish water.

Refugees as criminals? US govt report blames Amit Shah for calling Bangladeshis termites

Counterview Desk
The chapter “Freedom of Movement” of the US State Department’s “India 2018 Human Rights Report”, released recently, has criticized BJP chief Amit Shah for terming alleged Bangladeshis who may be in Assam as “termites”, because their names were struck down from the list of National Register of Citizens, under preparation in the state.
Pointing out that four million residents were excluded from Assam’s final draft list, leading to “uncertainty over the status of these individuals, many of whose families had lived in the state for several generations”, the report regrets, the Indian law does not even contain the term “refugee,” treating refugees like Rohingiyas as “any other foreigners.”
“Undocumented physical presence in the country is a criminal offense. Persons without documentation were vulnerable to forced returns and abuse”, the report says.
Text of the Freedom of Movement chapter: The law provides for freedom of internal movement, foreign travel, emigration, a…

Congress would win just 9 of 26 Lok Sabha seats: Gujarat Assembly segment-wise analysis

By Rajiv Shah
Even as the Congress plans its first working committee meet in Gujarat on February 28 after an almost 58 year gap, there is reason to wonder what is in store for India’s grand old party in a state which has been long been a BJP bastion – in fact ever since mid-1990s. Ahead of the then assembly polls in late 2012, talking with me, a senior Gujarat Congress leader, currently Rajya Sabha MP, frankly said he saw no reason why Congress would win.

"Pro-corporate" Supreme Court order on FRA would further marginalize Adivasis

By VS Roy David, JP Raju*
For millions of Adivasis and other traditional forest dwellers February 13, 2019 will go down in history as the day of apocalypse. This is like the proverbial Black Friday where millions of most marginalized people of India were ordered by malicious anti-people draconian Supreme Court order depriving them the life and livelihood by evicting them from their habitats.

Financial inclusion? Not micro-loans; India's poor "need" investment in health, education

By Moin Qazi*
India has grown into a global powerhouse. Its economy is soaring but the picture on the ground is still quite arid. The green shoots that you see are only a patch of its landscape. Most Indians are hapless victims of inequity. India is one country where intense poverty abounds in the shadow of immense wealth.

India, Pakistan told to eliminate nuclear weapons: N-war "would kill" 2 billion

Counterview Desk
The International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW), a non-partisan federation of national medical organizations in 64 countries, representing tens of thousands of doctors, medical students, other health workers, and concerned citizens, claiming to share the common goal of creating a more peaceful and secure world freed from the threat of nuclear annihilation, has warned that “an unprecedented global catastrophe” awaits the globe against the backdrop of warmongering in India and Pakistan.

Counterview

Search This Blog