Skip to main content

In praise of silence... Why shouldn't ministers be protected from dead children?

By Anand Mazgaonkar*  
Indore is supposed to be India’s cleanest city—of course, according to Central Government data, and given its stellar track record on transparency, accountability, and data integrity, it must be treated as entirely reliable. Therefore, any news about deaths due to water contamination must not be allowed to find its way into media outlets. 
After all, what are 13–14 deaths? BJP governments have brazened out far worse—demonetisation, the Covid tragedy, oxygen shortages, farmers’ deaths, Dalit rapes, mob lynchings, Ajay Mishra Teni, Kuldeep Sengar, Brij Bhushan, et al.
Anurag Dwary, the journalist who insisted on pushing the Minister to answer questions about children’s deaths and thereby forced him to lose his cool, is completely at fault. Journalism cannot be about burning issues or poor people’s lives and deaths. It ought to be about whether the Prime Minister cuts his mangoes or licks them (remember that doyen of journalism, Akshay Kumar? Aam kaat ke khate hain ya chaat ke?). If the offending journalist Anurag Dwary forgot Akshay Kumar’s shining example, he should at least have been conscious of the fact that he is an employee of Lala Seth Adani’s NDTV. If Anurag Dwary is going to defy post-2014 journalistic norms, he should be stripped of his microphone, just as policemen are stripped of their belts wherever they lack political patronage.
The Nation ought to be told what is happening to journalistic ethics and norms. One day Arnab suddenly turns on the government over Aravallis, Sengar, and Ankita Bhandari. The next day Anurag Dwary is concerned about deaths in Indore? Where is all this headed? Why is it spiralling out of control? Journalists today, courts tomorrow. And who knows—Gyanesh Kumar may suddenly discover his spine too! What ideas will that give Messrs Nitish and Naidu?
All journalists who obtained their journalism degrees before Kangana Ranaut’s India achieved independence in 2014 ought to be derecognised and thrown out of their jobs. They can take Smriti Irani’s help (remember that Dainik Bhaskar journalist in Amethi?) if they don’t know how to do it. Or why haven’t they yet thought of the bright idea of sending a bulldozer to Anurag Dwary’s residence? They only need to convince themselves that Anurag Dwary is actually Altaf Hussain Dwary. Only those with degrees in Entire Journalism or Entire Journalistic Science should be employed by Godi media houses.
Being only a State Minister, poor Vijayvargiya does not even enjoy the luxury of engineering distractions—diversions like Balakot or Pulwama. If these double-engine governments are unable to take any of the steps listed above, they should at least grant Mr Kailash Vijayvargiya the same privilege as Prime Minister Modi: no journalist interface, no press conferences. If even that is not possible, they should at least provide Vijayvargiya with Z+ paramilitary protection. And if the Z+ personnel are busy with Modi, Amit Shah, and Jay Shah, they should at least give him three-layer security of Bajrang Dal goons. It ought to be Mr Vijayvargiya’s constitutional right and privilege—equality before law—that the Modis and Shahs so richly enjoy.
Amen.
---
*Social activist

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.