Skip to main content

Parliamentarians today do not represent the tolerant milieu of Indian culture

By NS Venkataraman* 

A massive new parliament building with several special features and facilities have recently been inaugurated with much fanfare, pomp and show. During the inaugural programme, lofty speeches were made, terming the new parliament building as the renovated temple of democracy bringing great pride to the democratic system of governance in India.
Subsequently, as the monsoon session of parliament in the old parliament building is now on, marred by shoutings and cat calls rather than speeches and healthy debates, many discerning Indians certainly feel disappointed and even disgusted. Viewing the behavior pattern of the parliamentarians, their utter lack of discipline and decorum, many people have started wondering as to whether the massive expenses incurred and efforts put forth in constructing new parliament building could have been avoided, as many people justifiably conclude that these parliamentarians need no better facilities than the old parliament building.
Fortunately, so far, the monsoon session has been taking place only in the old parliament building , that has spared the floor and walls of the new parliament building from experiencing the indisciplined behavior of the parliamentarians.
It is well realized that a number of parliamentarians today are not the best of the citizens and it is difficult to think that these parliamentarians represent or reflect the traditional wisdom and culture and tolerant attitude that India is known for historically. Are these unruly parliamentarians , the real representative gathering of the people of India?
In the ongoing monsoon session, proceedings of the both the houses of parliament have been stalled for several days, demanding speech by the Prime Minister himself on the Manipur issue. The government said that it has no objection for debate on Manipur issue and the Home Minister who is the appropriate minister handling the Manipur issue ,would participate in the debate. But, the opposition MPs want the Prime Minister to speak. 
Many feel the demand of the opposition parties is totally illogical and appears to be motivated. There is an apprehension that looking at the behavior of the opposition MPs, they want to insult and humiliate the Prime Minister by shouting his speech down in case the Prime Minister were to yield to the demand of the opposition parties and to speak on the subject himself. The opposition MPs want to get vicarious satisfaction at the Prime Minister’s cost.
All said and done, the image of the parliamentarians amongst the citizens now have taken a beating and one can hear many people saying that the standard and behaviour of the parliamentarians are no better than those of the street urchins.
As India is now forging ahead in industrial and economic growth and overseas investors are showing considerable interest in investing in India and doing business here, happenings in India are now watched with great interest all over the world. The parliamentarians exhibiting obnoxious behavior are running down the image of India in the eyes of the world. Now, it would take a very long time for India to improve its image as a healthy democracy in the eyes of the world.
Another matter of high concern is about the type of message that misbehaving parliamentarians are conveying to the youth of the country and what kind of adverse influence they will create amongst the young students in the formative age group.
One would wish that the new parliament building should start functioning only after the 2024 national election, when the new government would take over. Hopefully, people would reject the present day parliamentarians in the forthcoming election, who have conducted themselves in an unbecoming way and brought disrepute to India as a vibrant democratic country.
Let the new parliament have members who are concerned about democracy, which is uppermost for keeping high the image of the country, and behave in a dignified manner in parliament, responding to the expectations of the countrymen.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights.