Skip to main content

Supreme Court order 'big relief' to Haldwani's badly threatened, deeply worried people

By Bharat Dogra* 

There were strong reasons why the issue of impending demolitions in Haldwani, Uttarakhand, had so quickly led to national level sympathy and support for the threatened nearly 50,000 people, and there are equally strong reasons why the Supreme Court order of January 5 providing relief to them deserves widespread appreciation.
It is obvious that the badly threatened, deeply worried people, faced with immediate eviction in the middle of cold wave conditions, felt a great sense of relief, and for this alone we are grateful to the learned judges of the Supreme Court of India. 
But in addition there is another reason for very widespread appreciation of this order and this relates to the stand taken by the honorable court that on such matters land records are not the only matter, the distress suffered by the people and considerations of their welfare are no less important and neither the government authorities nor the judiciary should ignore this dimension.
Unfortunately, the concerned authorities and even more surprisingly the High Court had not shown the due regard for this, to use mild words, with a call having been given for not just very hurried demolition/eviction but even securing the help of paramilitary forces to accomplish this. Hence the timely intervention of the Supreme Court has managed to save all round distress and bitterness.
At the same time the stand that the Apex Court has taken that such issues are settled best not just by land record intricacies but in addition necessarily also involve humanitarian considerations should serve as a very useful guidepost for the judiciary as well as government authorities.
In fact it is these humanitarian considerations that are often missing in decision making on such matters and the Supreme Court has done well to set the record straight and provide its guidance for improvement in keeping with the constitutional provisions of a welfare state.
Those who are found to have no rights but have been living there for years also need to be rehabilitated
The court has stated that the issue has a ‘human angle’. Many proceedings under the Public Premises Act were instituted ex parte against the families during the COVID-19 pandemic. A balance is needed between the railways’ need to develop the land and the families’ right to live with dignity.
While the rights of the various families on land have to be examined in more detail, even those who are found to have no rights but have been living there for years need to be rehabilitated. “They cannot be uprooted overnight from land”, Justice SK Kaul said. “It was not right to order bringing in para-military forces”, Justice AS Oka stated.
One hopes that this Supreme Court case which has started with such high hopes for vulnerable and threatened people will also end on a note of equal sense of justice for them.
Meanwhile, we can at least rest assured that with many eminent lawyers appearing on behalf of these people, the earlier strong and bitter sense of injustice has been removed when they were being asked to leave even without even giving them a fair hearing. 
The longer term contribution of the January 5 hearing will be that of very timely relief as well as a future guidepost for keeping in consideration welfare and humanitarian issues while hearing land issues involving vulnerable sections.

---
*Honorary convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now

Comments

TRENDING

'Enough evidence': Covid vaccines impacted women's reproductive health

By Deepika*  In 2024, the news outlets have suddenly started reporting about covid vaccine side effects in a very extensive manner. Sadly, the damage is already done.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Dadi, poti discuss 'injustice' under 10 yr Modi rule: Video campaign goes viral

By Our Representative  Watan Ki Raah Mein, a civil society campaign of the Samvidhan Bachao Nagrik Abhiyan, has released a short video conversation on social media of an exchange of letters between a dadi and her poti discussing poverty, unemployment, corruption and women’s safety. The letters also raise the question of  suppression of our fundamental rights of speech, expression and justice. 

US 'frustrated' with India’s discomfort: Maritime exercise in South China Sea

By Vijay Prashad*  In early April 2024, the navies of four countries -- Australia, Japan, the Philippines, and the United States -- held a maritime exercise in the South China Sea. Australia’s Warramunga, Japan’s Akebono, the Philippines’ Antonio Luna, and the United States’ Mobile worked together in these waters to strengthen their joint abilities and -- as they said in a joint statement  -- to “uphold the right to freedom of navigation and overflight and respect for maritime rights under international law.” 

'Uncertainty in Iran': Raisi brokered crucial Chabahar Port deal with India

By Pranjal Pandey*  Ebrahim Raisi, the Iranian President, and the country’s foreign minister were tragically found deceased on May 20, 2024, shortly after their helicopter crashed in foggy conditions. In response, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei swiftly appointed a relatively unknown vice president as the interim leader.

Informal, outdoor workers 'excluded': Govt of India's excessive heat policies

Counterview Desk  Top civil rights network, National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), has demanded urgent government action to protect millions of outdoor workers from extreme heat and heatwaves, insisting declaration of heatwaves as climatic disaster.

Desist from academic censorship, stop threatening scholars: Letter to ICMR

Counterview Desk  In a letter to the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) director, the Universal Health Organisation (UHO) which consists of prominent health experts, has insisted that the Government of India’s top medical research agency should lead high quality research on vaccine safety and “desist from academic censorship”.

WHO move can 'enable' India to detain citizens, restrict freedom, control media

Counterview Desk  In an an open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, with copies to concerned Cabinet ministers, bureaucrats and MPs,  health rights network  People’s Alliance for Public Health (PAPH alias JanSwasthya Morcha), has urged that India should not be a signatory to the World Health Organization ( WHO) Pandemic Agreement and Amendments to the  International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005  to be adopted at the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva from 27th May to 1st June, 2024.

Vaccine nationalism? Covaxin isn't safe either, perhaps it's worse: Experts

By Rajiv Shah  I was a little awestruck: The news had already spread that Astrazeneca – whose Indian variant Covishield was delivered to nearly 80% of Indian vaccine recipients during the Covid-19 era – has been withdrawn by the manufacturers following the admission by its UK pharma giant that its Covid-19 vector-based vaccine in “rare” instances cause TTS, or “thrombocytopenia thrombosis syndrome”, which lead to the blood to clump and form clots. The vaccine reportedly led to at least 81 deaths in the UK.