Indian industry feeling Modi govt heat? Opposes move to provide competitive advantage to PSU power cos

Has the Indian industry begun to come off its shell, beginning to see that something is fundamentally wrong, detrimental to its interests, with policies adopted by the Government of India (GoI)? It would see so, if the latest move by the Association of Power Producers (APP), is any indication.
APP, significantly, is the apex body of the country’s top industrial houses, ranging from Adani and Tata to Reliance (Anil Ambani) and Torrent, all of them so far considered pro-Narendra Modi, and involved in power generation.
In a strongly-worded letter to Union minister for power and new & renewable energy Raj Kumar Singh, APP director-general Ashok Khurana has said that the GoI has come with a “very regressive provision” in order to protect state-sector power generating stations from competition by seeking to “reintroducing the cost-plus regime”.
Calling it “discriminatory”, the APP letter warned, the proposed amendment to the Tariff Policy 2016 would have “wide-ranging impact on investments in power Sector, especially in generation segment”, pointing out, it would mean that “now only private generators would be subjected to competition.”
The Tariff Policy, 2006 had stipulated all future requirement of power were to be procured through competitive bidding, even as providing an exemption to the public sector projects for five years, i.e. till January 2011. The five-year moratorium was particularly advantageous to the National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC), the Central public sector undertaking (PSU), which has a generating capacity of 53,651 MW.
While NTPC sought the extension of the timeline in 2010, the APP letter noted, “it was as not agreed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC)”, which argued, on the basis of an analysis of NTPC’s 14 projects, that, thanks to the cost plus regime, their tariffs were “significantly lower than regulated tariffs”. The Tariff Policy 2016, as a result, “kept the Central sector generating stations out of the cost-plus regime.”
APP said, “In the last of 8-9 years, all other components of the cost of supply (controlled by government monopolies) have increased by 13% to 300%, while the cost of generation, where private sector contributed significantly during the 11th and 12th plan period (2007 onwards, when UPA was in power) has come down by 21% due to enhanced efficiency of the private sector developers.”
It added, “Despite the fact that cost-plus regime has not led to reasonable and competitive rates, it is surprising that, contrary to the advice of CERC, the Ministry of Power is again proposing to reintroduce this regressive provision.”
Pointing out that “the proposed provision discriminates on the ground of ownership – public vis-s-vis private – to allow public sector projects to enter into power purchase agreement (PPA) under cost plus regime”, the letter insisted, “The cardinal principle of public policy is that all stakeholders should be treated alike.”
Pointing out how NTPC, which is “yet to sign a single competitively bid project”, has already started avoiding competition by entering into joint ventures with states to remain under the cost plus regime”, the letter said, this has already distorted the “competitive landscape.”
In fact, it said, a piquant situation has arisen, where public sector power plants Sholapur and Barh Stage 2, with tariff at Rs 5.30 and Rs 5.68 per unit, respectively, have assured PPAs, whereas private-owned plants willing to sell power between Rs 3.00 and Rs 3.25 per unit are struggling for want of PPAs.

Comments

Dalit rights and political tensions: Why is Mevani at odds with Congress leadership?

While I have known Jignesh Mevani, one of the dozen-odd Congress MLAs from Gujarat, ever since my Gandhinagar days—when he was a young activist aligned with well-known human rights lawyer Mukul Sinha’s organisation, Jan Sangharsh Manch—he became famous following the July 2016 Una Dalit atrocity, in which seven members of a family were brutally assaulted by self-proclaimed cow vigilantes while skinning a dead cow, a traditional occupation among Dalits.

Global NGO slams India for media clampdown during conflict, downplays Pakistan

A global civil rights group, Civicus has taken strong exception to how critical commentaries during the “recent conflict” with Pakistan were censored in India, with journalists getting “targeted”. I have no quarrel with the Civicus view, as the facts mentioned in it are all true.

Whither SCOPE? Twelve years on, Gujarat’s official English remains frozen in time

While writing my previous blog on how and why Narendra Modi went out of his way to promote English when he was Gujarat chief minister — despite opposition from people in the Sangh Parivar — I came across an interesting write-up by Aakar Patel, a well-known name among journalists and civil society circles.

Boeing 787 under scrutiny again after Ahmedabad crash: Whistleblower warnings resurface

A heart-wrenching tragedy has taken place in Ahmedabad. As widely reported, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner plane crashed shortly after taking off from the city’s airport, currently operated by India’s top tycoon, Gautam Adani. The aircraft was carrying 230 passengers and 12 crew members. As expected, the crash has led to an outpouring of grief across the country. At the same time, there have been demands for the resignation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Amit Shah, and the Civil Aviation Minister.

Remembering Vijay Rupani: A quiet BJP leader who listened beyond party lines

Late evening on June 12, a senior sociologist of Indian origin, who lives in Vienna, asked me a pointed question: Of the 241 persons who died as a result of the devastating plane crash in Ahmedabad the other day, did I know anyone? I had no hesitation in telling her: former Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani, whom I described to her as "one of the more sensible persons in the BJP leadership."

Why India’s renewable energy sector struggles under 2,735 compliance hurdles

Recently, during a conversation with an industry representative, I was told how easy it is to set up a startup in Singapore compared to India. This gentleman, who had recently visited Singapore, explained that one of the key reasons Indians living in the Southeast Asian nation prefer establishing startups there is because the government is “extremely supportive” when it comes to obtaining clearances. “They don’t want to shift operations to India due to the large number of bureaucratic hurdles,” he remarked.

Unchecked urbanisation, waste dumping: Study warns of 'invited disaster' as khadi floods threaten half of Surat

An action research report, “Invited Disaster: Khadi Floods in Surat City”, published by two civil rights groups, Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti and the People's Union for Civil Liberties, Surat, states that nearly half of Gujarat's top urban conglomerate—known for its concentration of textile and diamond polishing industries—is affected by the dumping of debris and solid waste, along with the release of treated and untreated sewage into the khadis (rivulets), thereby increasing the risk of flood disaster.

Guha plans book to counter Dalit, Marxist, and right-wing critics of Gandhi, recalls Modi’s 'pernicious lie' on Patel

Let me first confess: writing about an event three weeks after it has taken place is no good, especially for a newsperson. However, ever since I attended the public lecture by well-known historian Ramachandra Guha on May 18, organised by Sarthak Prakashan for the release of the Gujarati edition of his book monumental book "India After Gandhi", frankly, I kept wondering if he had said anything newsworthy apart from what had already appeared in the media ever since the book's first edition came out in 2007. Call it my inertia or whatever.

Two decades on, hunger still haunts Gujarat: Survey exposes stark gap behind poverty claims

A Niti Aayog report , released about two years ago, estimated that in Gujarat — which our powers-that-be have long considered a model state — 11.66% of people are "multidimensionally poor," a term referring to an index that seeks to estimate "multiple and simultaneous deprivations" at the household level across three macro categories: health, education, and living standards.

Search This Blog