Skip to main content

The proposed MIthi Virdi N-plant is based on "untested" reactor technology, alleges environmental NGO

AP1000 reactor
By Our Representative
Top Gujarat-based environmental NGO Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti has claimed that the technology being used for the proposed nuclear power plant at Mithi Virdi, Westinghouse AP1000 “is an untested reactor technology”, and the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has already “raised several technical doubts about the reactors, which were given a nod to by non-technical committee members of the NRC.” In a statement, issued jointly with the Bhavnagar Jilla Gram Bachao Samiti and the Gujarat Anu-urja Mukti Andolan, the NGO said this is particularly dangerous as the “exact location of the Nuclear Power Plant (Westinghouse AP1000) is just a few km away from Alang Shipbreaking Yard”.
Apart from this, there are “five villages – Jaspara, Mithi Virdi, Mandva, Khadarpar and Sosiya – who stand to lose 777 hectares of their fertile land to the proposed nuclear power plant.” Of the five villages, three villages – Mithi Virdi, Jaspara and Sosiya – are situated along the coastline. "Most of the land proposed to be acquired falls under Jaspara village. There are total 152 villages in 30 km radius of the proposed nuclear power plant”, the statement reads, adding, “The main occupation of the villagers is agriculture. The rich alluvial soil here supports crops like groundnut, wheat, bajra, cotton, etc., and fruits like mango, chikoo, coconut, etc. This area also grows and supplies vegetables like onion, brinjal, gourd, tomatoes, drumsticks, etc. The agriculture department has found the climate and soil suitable for cashew nuts.”
The statement has been issued to mark Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s visit to the US from September 20 to 28, 2013, when “there is a possibility of the meeting between Westinghouse and the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) to finalize the deal for the Mithi Virdi plant”, statement says, adding, to mark a protest, on September 23, the anti-nuclear NGOs are planning a massive rally, starting at Mithi Virdi and ending at Bhavnagar.
The site selection committee for the Nuclear Power Plant constituted in 2005 short-listed Mithi Virdi and submitted its report on June 28, 2007. Earlier, in January 2007, Gujarat government signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the NPCIL. Before the site was selected, people of the area were “blissfully unaware of the proposed nuclear project”, the statement said, adding, only when Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti activists visited Mithi Virdi area that people came to know of “impending threat to their land, livelihood, and environmental and health hazards of nuclear energy.”
Since 2007 the Bhavnagar Jilla Gram Bachao Samiti, Anu Urja Abhyas Juth, Gujarat Anu-urja Mukti Andolan and Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti conducted awareness programmes. “As a result the villagers with the supports of number of organisations in Gujarat and across India started agitation against the proposed 6000 MW Mithi Virdi Nuclear Power Plant. The slogan of the struggle today is – No Nuclear Power Plant in Mithi Virdi, not anywhere in the world”, the statement says.
Giving reasons for the opposition to the nuclear power plant, the statement says, “Two years after the Fukushima disaster, its impact on the global nuclear industry has become increasingly visible. Global electricity generation from nuclear plants dropped by a historic 7 percent in 2012, adding to the record drop of 4 percent in 2011. This is, according to World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2013 (WNISR), which provides a global overview of the history, the current status and the trends of nuclear power programs worldwide.”
Quoting from the report, the statement says, it “includes an update on nuclear economics as well as an overview of the status, on-site and off-site, of the challenges triggered by the Fukushima disaster”. At the same time, the report emphasizes that recent post-Fukushima “developments should not obscure an important fact – that the world nuclear industry already faced daunting challenges long before Fukushima, just as the US nuclear power industry had largely collapsed after the 1979 Three Mile Island accident. The nuclear promoters’ invention that a global nuclear renaissance was flourishing until 3/11 is equally false. Fukushima only added to the already grave problems, starting with poor economics.”
The statement says, “There are 31 countries operating nuclear power plants in the world. A total of 427 reactors have a combined installed capacity of 364 GWe. These figures assume the final shutdown of the ten reactors at Fukushima-Daiichi and Daini. It should be noted that as of July 1, 2013 only two (Ohi-3 and -4) of the 44 remaining Japanese reactors are operating and their future is highly uncertain. In fact, many observers believe that a large share of the suspended Japanese units will likely never restart.”
It further says, “The nuclear industry is also in decline. The 427 operating reactors are 17 lower than the peak in 2002, while, the total installed capacity peaked in 2010 at 375 GWe before declining to the current level of 364 GWe, which was last seen a decade ago. Annual nuclear electricity generation reached a maximum in 2006 at 2,660 TWh, then dropped to 2,346 TWh in 2012 (down 7 percent compared to 2011, down 12 percent from 2006). About three-quarters of this decline is due to the situation in Japan, but 16 other countries, including the top five nuclear generators, decreased their nuclear generation too.”
It adds, “The nuclear share in the world’s power generation declined steadily from a historic peak of 17 percent in 1993 to about 10 percent in 2012. Nuclear power’s share of global commercial primary energy production plunged to 4.5 percent, a level last seen in 1984. Only one country, the Czech Republic, reached its record nuclear contribution to the electricity mix in 2012. The report also points out that two-thirds (44) of the units under construction are located in three countries – China, India and Russia.”
The statement regrets it is against this backdrop that the Government of India is aggressively pursuing its nuclear programmes “in spite of people from Koodankulam (Tamil Nadu), Jaitapur (Maharashtra), Mithi Virdi (Gujarat), Kovvada (Andhra Pradesh), Gorakhpur (Haryana), Chutka (Madhya Pradesh) and Haripur (West Bengal) waging relentless struggles against these anti-people and unsafe nuclear power projects promoted by the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL). Their massive peaceful protests have mostly been met with callousness and brutal repression on the part of the governments.”

Comments

Jag Jivan said…
What the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti says about N-plant in general may or may not be true, it's a question of opinion. However, it appears to be spreading misinformation about US NRC report. If earlier NRC may have found Westinghouse AP1000 reactor defective, the last report, of 2011, cleared it after the removal of defects. Let me quote relevant para: "The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed Westinghouse's changes to the AP1000 design documentation. On the basis of the evaluation described in the AP1000 FSER (NUREG-1793, NUREG-1793 Supplement 1) and this report, the NRC staff concludes that the AP1000 design documentation (up to and including Revision 19 to the AP1000 design control document) is acceptable and that Westinghouse's application for design certification meets the requirements of Subpart B, Standard Design Certifications, of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 52 that are applicable and technically relevant to the AP1000 standard plant design." Would the NGO care to reply?
Anuj Wankhede said…
Hi Jag,

The AP1000 saga is ongoing since 2005-2006 since its first application for certification to the NRC. All the time, Westinghouse-Toshiba have claimed that this is the "SAFEST" reactor ever built and can withstand "beyond design" events. Now, how many times have we heard this story from nuclear suppliers!!
Anyway, the jury is still out with many notable people from nuclear engineering, physicists and even ex-NRC safety members raising concerns about the AP1000 design and its ability to withstand certain events and pointing out to its weaknesses (esp. in case of a 911 type of attack). Remember that literally hundreds of foreign flag ships sail in and out of Alang ship breaking yard which is merely a couple of km from the proposed site.
Apart from all this, there are issues of damage to ecology, environment, loss of livelihood to farmers and fishermen, huge displacement and a larger human rights issue. All this in a state which has NO power shortage at all as per the latest CEA published figures.
One should take a holistic view in such issues as the immediate and consequent damages will last for hundreds of years and look at safer and ecologically friendly means of energy generation.

Thank you,

Anuj Wankhede

TRENDING

Hindus to be 'sent' to Kashmir? Despite Israeli settlements, peace eludes the region

By Anand K Sahay*
Curfew, news and communications blackout, transportation shut-down... News reports from Kashmir are worrying. So are the views relayed through the media, especially television. Old-fashioned repression seems to be consorting comfortably with expressions of concern “for our Kashmiri brethren”. We are looking at Orwell’s 1984 in the making.

Dholera 'inundated': Gujarat govt tries selling low lying area as top smart city site

Counterview Desk
Even as the Dholera Special Investment Region Regional Development Authority (DSIRDA) of the Gujarat government was busy organising a junket for Gujarat-based journalists for the area sought to be sold as an ideal special investment region (SIR) for industrialists, well-known farmers' activist Sagar Rabari has wondered why no investor has so far agreed to put in money in an area situated in Ahmedabad district along the Gulf of Khambhat.

Congress' anti-democratic laws led to Modi govt's 'Constitutional' changes: Scholars

Counterview Desk
A large number of academics* said to be belonging to several Indian and international institutions, even as taking strong exception to the Narendra Modi government's alleged move to amend the Constitution through "illegitimate" means, have taken strong exception to their colleagues in academia who we have become "all too accustomed to adopting a calculated silence in the face of such indignities."

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam*
In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

UN experts object to GoI move to 'reinforce' trend of prosecution, eviction of tribals

Counterview Desk
In a report sent to the Government of India, three United Nations (UN) special rapporteurs, expressing "concerns" over the failure to ensure "adequate" implementation of the India Forest Rights Act (FRA), have regretted that the Government of India has not cared to reply their previous communications on this.

Modi's Gujarati mind? Why govt move to 'sell-off' defence PSUs isn't in national interest

By Sandeep Pandey*
The Standing Committee on Defence, 2017-18, of the 16th Lok Sabha highlights the idea of Buy Indian-IDDM (Indigenously Designed Developed and Manufactured). The Committee expressed concern over the import content of equipments produced and developed by Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), Ordnance Factories (OFs) and defence Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) because of the dependence it creates for military hardware on foreign suppliers.

As submergence stares Narmada valley, Patkar says: With powerful in throne, we're helpless

Counterview Desk
Well-known anti-dam organization, Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), plans to begin its “Resist Illegal Submergence in Narmada Valley” satyagraha on August 21 at Jantar Mantar, Delhi, amidst news that the situation in the valley is “critical”, with two persons having already died in flood-related incidents in the upstream of the Sardar Sarovar dam.

RTI Act holy cow for Govt of India? Official insists, don't ask why, when, what, where

By Pankti Jog*
The Government of India appears to have begun treating the Right to Information (RTI) Act as a holy cow. Its officials seem to believe that the Act is a sacred law, under which people shouldn't be questioning its functioning. One recalls what Prime Minister Narendra Modi said while addressing an RTI convention in 2015: “Why should government wait for people to ask information, we will have all information out in the domain, we have nothing to hide."

Can't go to court with RTI information, rule Ahmedabad authorities: Kankaria accident

By Pankti Jog*
In a shocking reply to an application filed by me, the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) authorities have said that the information provided under the Right to Information (RT) Act should be used in court or in a judicial process. The Act is known to be a major tool that enables citizens to seek certified copies of documents, records from any public authority of state and Central government within 30 days, as per provisions of the Act.

Central Gujarat effluent channel 'releasing' highly polluted industrial wastewater: PM told

Counterview Desk
Senior environmentalists of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti (PSS), Vadodara, Rohit Prajapati and Krishnakant, in an open letter to the Prime Minister, the Gujarat chief minister, the Gujarat chief secretary, and senior Government of India and Gujarat government officials dealing with environment, pollution and climate change have said that the authorities’ response their pleas to take action against the leakages and flow of polluted wastewater from the effluent channels of Central Gujarat industrial areas has met with complete inertia.