Skip to main content

Why burn Manusmriti? Why not preserve it to demonstrate, display historicity of casteism?

In a significant Facebook post, Rana Singh, former associate professor of English at Patna University, has revealed something that few seem to know.
Titled "The Shudras in Manusmriti", Singh says, because Manusmriti is discussed so often, he thought of reading it himself. “This book likely dates back to the 2nd or 3rd century BCE, and the presence of contradictory statements suggests that it is not the work of a single author,” he says in his Facebook post in Hindi, written in 2022 and recently reshared.
Singh observes that, in its early portions, Manusmriti appears relatively soft toward Shudras, but as one reads further, the hostility against them intensifies. "One notable aspect is that the early portions of Manusmriti do not display extreme hatred toward Shudras," he says, offering the following quotation from the text:
> "Even from the lowliest person, one should learn excellent knowledge. One should learn the doctrine of liberation even from a Chandal (outcaste). And one may accept a virtuous wife even from a lower caste." (2/238)
Also:
> "If a Vaishya or Shudra arrives as a guest at a Brahmin's house, he should be fed religiously along with the servants." (3/112)
Singh comments, "Overall, this text reflects a transitional society moving toward rigid divisions between varnas and castes," pointing to the historical context in which this transformation might have occurred.
"Manusmriti’s goodwill towards Brahmins and Kshatriyas, along with its anger towards Shudras, indicates that it was written in an era dominated by Brahmin-Kshatriya dynasties," says Singh, adding, "These rulers had either recently seized power from the Shudras (non-Aryan people outside the Brahmin, Kshatriya, and Vaishya groups) or had subjugated them through war or by crushing their rebellions."
Singh further argues, "It is also possible that, during this period, Shudras still held power in some places or even served as military commanders (judges) under Aryan kings." He cites the following verses from Manusmriti to support his point:
> "Brahmins should not reside in a country where a Shudra is the king." (4/61-62)
"The kingdom in which a Shudra serves as a judge suffers like a cow stuck in the mud." (8/21)
According to Singh, "Manusmriti harbors such intense resentment toward these non-Aryan Shudras that, while exempting Brahmins from the death penalty for any crime, it prescribes brutal punishments for even minor offenses committed by Shudras."
To support this claim, he provides the following examples from the text— a book that RSS founders once suggested should have been the basis of India’s Constitution.
  • A Kshatriya who insults a Brahmin is fined 100 panas, a Vaishya 150-200 panas, but a Shudra should be given the death penalty. (8/268)
  • If a Shudra contemptuously utters the name or caste of a Brahmin, a ten-inch iron rod should be thrust into his mouth. (8/271)
  • If a Shudra arrogantly preaches religious teachings to Brahmins, the king should pour boiling oil into his mouth and ears. (8/272)
  • If a Shudra strikes a twice-born (Brahmin, Kshatriya, or Vaishya) with any limb, that limb should be cut off. If he raises his hand or stick against a Brahmin, his hand should be cut off. If he kicks a Brahmin in anger, his foot should be severed. (8/279-280)
  • If a Shudra spits on a Brahmin out of pride or urinates on him, his lips and genitals should be cut off. If he expels gas toward a Brahmin, his anus should be cut off. (8/282)
Singh continues, "The author of Manusmriti considers the killing of a Shudra to be as insignificant as the killing of animals like dogs, cats, and crows."
He cites the following verse to illustrate this:
> "The expiation for killing a cat, a mongoose, a blue jay, a frog, a dog, a lizard, an owl, or a crow is equal to that for killing a Shudra." (11/131)
Furthermore, Singh notes that Manusmriti denies Shudras the right to own property. He quotes from the text, often regarded as a Hindu law book:
> "The wealth of a Shudra consists only of dogs and donkeys. Their clothing comes from the dead. They must eat from broken utensils. Shudra women should wear only iron jewelry."
I have often wondered why people—including my friend and insightful activist with a scholarly bent of mind, Martin Macwan—insist on burning Manusmriti. While such symbolic acts represent legitimate Dalit anger against dominant caste violence, does the book not also reflect the socio-political changes that India underwent during the period of its composition?
Why shouldn’t Manusmriti be preserved to demonstrate how casteism became increasingly rigid at the time it was written—possibly by not one but several “scholars”? Does it not reveal how ancient Indian society became progressively cruel?
Indeed, the book holds historical significance and remains relevant in understanding why and how casteism should be fought. I am reminded of the museums I visited in several U.S. cities, which graphically depict the exploitation of Black people, particularly during the slave trade.
Unfortunately, those who call for Manusmriti to be burned do not seem to have considered displaying its horrors in a museum. Such a display could educate non-Dalits about the brutal treatment of Shudras and “untouchables” in ancient India.
I wonder why Mayawati, a Dalit, during her tenure as Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, went to such great lengths to set up a beautiful garden with elephant statues all around but did not take the time to establish a world-class museum showcasing the exploitation of those whom B.R. Ambedkar called the "Depressed Classes" and their lives in ancient India.
Wouldn't such a museum help those campaigning internationally by drawing a parallel between untouchability and racism—something the Government of India and dominant caste groups have opposed for years?

Comments

TRENDING

Morari Bapu echoes misleading figures to support the BJP's anti-conversion agenda

A senior Gujarat activist phoned me today to inform me that the well-known storyteller on Lord Ram, Morari Bapu, has made an "unsubstantiated" and "preposterous" statement in Songadh town, located in the tribal-dominated Tapi district. He claimed that while the Gujarat government wants the Bhagavad Gita to be taught in schools, the "problem is" that 75% of government teachers "are Christians who do not let this happen" and are “involved in religious conversions.”

Patriot, Link: How Soviet imbroglio post-1968 crucially influenced alternative media platforms

Adatata Narayanan, Aruna Asaf Ali Alternative media, as we know it today in the age of information and communication technology (ICT), didn't exist in the form it does today during or around the time I joined formal journalism at Link Newsweekly as a sub-editor in January 1979. However, Link, and its sister publication Patriot, a daily—both published from Delhi—were known to have provided what could be called an alternative media platform at a time when major Delhi-based dailies were controlled by media barons.

60 crore in Mahakumbh? It's all hype with an eye on UP polls, asserts keen BJP supporter in Amit Shah's constituency

As the Mahakumbh drew to a close, during my daily walk, I met a veteran BJP supporter—a neighbor with whom we would often share dinner in a group. An amicable person, the first thing he asked me, as he was about to take the lift to his flat, was, "How many people do you think must have participated in the holy dip?" He then stopped by to talk—which we did for a full half-hour, cutting into my walk time.

Breaking news? Top Hindu builder ties up with Muslim investor for a huge minority housing society in Ahmedabad

There is a flutter in Ahmedabad's Vejalpur area, derogatorily referred to as the "border" because, on its eastern side, there is a sprawling minority area called Juhapura, where around five lakh Muslims live. The segregation is so stark that virtually no Muslim lives in Vejalpur, populated by around four lakh Hindus, and no Hindu lives in Juhapura.

Justifying social divisions? 'Dogs too have caste system like we humans, it's natural'

I have never had any pets, nor am I very comfortable with them. Frankly, I don't know how to play with a pet dog. I just sit quietly whenever I visit someone and see their pet dog trying to lick my feet. While I am told not to worry, I still choose to be a little careful, avoiding touching the pet.

An untold story? Still elusive: Gujarati language studies on social history of Gujarat's caste and class evolution

This is a follow-up to my earlier blog , where I mentioned that veteran scholar Prof. Ghanshyam Shah has just completed a book for publication on a topic no academic seems to have dealt with—caste and class relations in Gujarat’s social history. He forwarded me a chapter of the book, published as an "Economic & Political Weekly" article last year, which deals with the 2015 Patidar agitation in the context of how this now-powerful caste originated in the Middle Ages and how it has evolved in the post-independence era.

Caste, class, and Patidar agitation: Veteran academic 'unearths' Gujarat’s social history

Recently, I was talking with a veteran Gujarat-based academic who is the author of several books, including "Social Movements in India: A Review of Literature", "Untouchability in Rural India", "Public Health and Urban Development: The Study of Surat Plague", and "Dalit Identity and Politics", apart from many erudite articles and papers in research and popular journals.

Socialist utopia challenging feudal and Brahminical systems: Kanwal Bharti on Sant Raidas’ vision of Begumpura

In a controversial claim, well-known Dalit writer and columnist Kanwal Bharti has asserted that a clever Brahminical move appears to be behind the Guru Granth Sahib changing the name of the 15th-16th century mystic poet-saint of the Bhakti movement, Sant Raidas, to Sant Ravidas.

New York-based digital company traces Modi's meteoric rise to global Hindutva ecosystem over several decades

A recent document, released by the Polis Project Inc.—a New York-based digital magazine and hybrid research and journalism organization—even as seeking to highlight the alleged rise of authoritarianism in India, has sought to trace Prime Minister Narendra Modi's meteoric rise since 2014 to the ever-expanding global Hindutva ecosystem over the last several decades.