Skip to main content

To Union budget, sanitation work is nothing but an issue of mechanisation


By Kalpana Bishwakarma* 
‘Leave No One Behind’ is the Central, transformative promise of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals which is a priority of India too. The question is, does our action at the national level reflect our commitment to this promise? And how do we know? The Union budget reflects the visions and committed actions and the Political will to actually ‘Leave no one behind’.
India, the largest democracy in the world is also home to diverse cultures, communities, lingo, caste, and creed which are to a large extent woven into the fabric of the caste system and hence caste-based discrimination, one of the unacceptable forms of Human Right Violation in the country. In the name of forest conservation, preservation, and climate action, thousands of Adivasis, and forest dwellers are evicted from their natural habitat and exposed to a chaotic habitat they are not accustomed to.
The Union Budget reflects the political will of the government in delivering socio-economic justice to the citizens which are guaranteed by the constitution of India. It is by large an important tool for measuring the impact of developmental actions and programs for the well-being of the citizen. The ruling government introduced the Interim budget in February 2024 and the final budget was released in July-end 2024 by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitaraman. 
The trend in diversion of the large portion of the allocation to general schemes still continues. It is to be noted that Dalits and Adivasi along with other marginalized sections of the community are still far away from mainstream society in terms of education, employment, ownership of land, and protection against communal violence and atrocities.
The loosening grip of the set guidelines currently known as Development Action Plan for Scheduled Castes (DAPSC) and Development Action Plan for Scheduled Tribe-DAPST on the union budget strongly questions the political will of the government. 
The diverse socio-economic map of the country calls for a unique and multisectoral approach to address the developmental needs of the communities, but does our Union Budget reflect the political will and deliberate action of government towards these developmental needs? It is largely debatable. 
The total Union budget allocation for the Financial Year-FY 2024-25 is Rs 51,89,144 crore out of which the total allocation for the welfare of the Scheduled Castes is Rs 1,65,493 crore and Rs 1,24,909 crore for the welfare of the Scheduled Tribes. It is quite surprising but not shocking to see that only Rs 46,192 crore has been allocated under the targeted schemes for SCs and Rs 41,730  crore for STs. 
The allocation under the National Overseas Scholarship is Rs 95 crore for SC and Rs 6 crore for ST for this FY 2024-25. The post-matric scholarship which is one of the most important scholarships has an allocation of Rs  6349.97 for SCs which is slightly lesser than what they allocated last year and for STs it is Rs  2374.15 an increase from last year which was Rs  1,970.77  crore The demand is to increase this allocation to Rs  10,000 crore.  
Land ownership, sustainable livelihood, food security, disaster relief, and protection against atrocities are some of the core developmental areas that require attention, and exclusive and adequate allocation for Dalit and Adivasi communities because they are the most vulnerable and susceptible to Socio-economic discrimination and Disasters.
The eviction of the slum dwellers, forest dwellers, and dependants are serious human rights issues that need intervention but no allocation has been made for the rehabilitation of evicted people from the slums in the union budget. Under the housing schemes for Scheduled Castes, Rs 17,164,31  crore has been allocated and Rs 14,105,91 crore has been allocated for Scheduled Tribes which needs an increase.
Dalits comprise the largest sanitation workforce working as Safai Karamcharis in the country but sadly the human rights component is swiped under the rug on the pretext that sanitation work issues are nothing but the issue of mechanisation. The total allocation under the NAMASTE Scheme is Rs 116.94 crore and the total allocation for the National Safai Karamchari Finance and Development Corporation is Rs 0.01 crore. The rampant death of Dalit Safai Karamchari in the sewage and manhole is still prevalent yet preventable, who is accountable and how long will it take for the MS Act of 2013 to work on the real ground?
According to the National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights (NCDHR), crimes and atrocities against Dalits and Adivasis are increasing every year and yet the allocation for the Implementation of the POA (Prevention of Atrocities Act,1989) and PCR (Protection of Civil Rights Act,1955) is only Rs 550  crore. 
It has called for the immediate attention of the Government to protect the rights and entitlement of the Dalit and Adivasis through adequate allocation under the targeted schemes for the welfare of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribe and prevent the diversion of funds to general schemes. Let the promise ‘Leave no one behind’ resonate with the actions and promises that are made to the thousands of Dalits and Adivasis. 
It hopes that the in the revised budget estimates the ministry will take cognizance of the gaps in the budget allocation and ensure adequate allocation is given for the schemes directly impacting the community. 
---
*On behalf of National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative   A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.
Post a Comment
»

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.
59 comments
»

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.
Post a Comment
»

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”
Post a Comment
»

Paper guarantees, real hardship: How budget 2026–27 abandons rural India

By Vikas Meshram   In the history of Indian democracy, the Union government’s annual budget has always carried great significance. However, the 2026–27 budget raises several alarming concerns for rural India. In particular, the vague provisions of the VBG–Ram Ji scheme and major changes to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) have put the future of rural workers at risk. A deeper reading of the budget reveals that these changes are not merely administrative but are closely tied to political and economic priorities that will have far-reaching consequences for millions of rural households.
Post a Comment
»

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 
Post a Comment
»

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram   In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.
Post a Comment
»

Frugal funds, fading promises: Budget 2026 exposes shrinking space for minority welfare

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The Ministry of Minority Affairs was established in 2006 during the tenure of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, following the findings of the Sachar Committee, which documented that Muslims were among the most educationally and economically disadvantaged communities in India. The ministry was conceived as a corrective institutional response to deep structural inequalities faced by religious minorities, particularly Muslims, through focused policy interventions.
Post a Comment
»

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.
1 comment
»