Skip to main content

Begun seven years ago, Rohingya crisis shows 'no sign of resolution'

By Ozair Islam* 
The Rohingya crisis, which began seven years ago, shows no signs of resolution. In 2017, over a million Rohingya fled Myanmar for Bangladesh, escaping systematic ethnic cleansing by their government. This ongoing situation is marked by severe human rights violations, with the violent crackdown in 2017 resulting in approximately 9,000 deaths and extensive destruction. 
Despite the protracted nature of this crisis, there is an urgent appeal for continued international support to safeguard the nearly one million Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh and to seek long-term solutions to their plight. 
The Rohingya, an ethnic group in Myanmar, have faced sustained persecution since the 1970s. The military coup in Myanmar in 2021 exacerbated their vulnerability, with the military's actions alongside the Arakan Army further endangering their lives. As of July 2024, more than 100,000 Rohingya refugees have sought shelter in Malaysia, with many others in Indonesia, Thailand, and Bangladesh, indicating a dire and ongoing situation. 
One of the stark failures of the international community was its sluggish response during the peak of the genocide in 2017. Critiques have emerged highlighting the lack of emergency intake, repatriation, or resettlement programs that could have provided relief during that critical period. The Rohingya crisis illustrates the devastating consequences of prolonged and organized persecution. 
Previous attempts at repatriation, initiated by Bangladesh and Myanmar through bilateral negotiations, have yielded no results, with not a single Rohingya able to return home. Institutional responses from the UN Security Council, ASEAN, and countries including China, India, the United States, and the United Kingdom have been disappointingly inadequate. 
Long-term solutions remain elusive, and many Rohingya find themselves in precarious positions, unable to rebuild their lives or integrate into host communities due to a lack of effective resettlement and socio-economic inclusion initiatives. 
Dr. Muhammad Yunus (photo), Chief Advisor to Bangladesh's Interim Government, has rightly urged the global community to offer unwavering support aimed at ensuring "eventual repatriation to Myanmar with safety, dignity, and full rights." He emphasized the need to recognize Bangladesh's humanitarian efforts during a time of national transition. 
The path forward for addressing the Rohingya issue requires concerted efforts from various nations and international organizations. Former UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has criticized Myanmar's government for its lack of urgency in repatriating displaced individuals. Current UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has expressed deep concern regarding the ongoing crisis. 
Yanghee Lee, the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in Myanmar, has stated that all major countries need to engage actively in finding a resolution. In December 2019, the UN General Assembly passed a resolution condemning human rights abuses perpetrated by the Myanmar government against the Rohingya and other religious minorities, urging the nation to stop inciting hatred. 
However, the international community must move beyond mere statements and take decisive action. Creating conditions for safe and sustainable reintegration into Myanmar remains essential for resolving this crisis, underscoring the urgent need for political will on the part of the global community. 
Voluntary return is crucial for resolving the refugee crisis. Before Rohingya refugees can consider returning to Myanmar, assurance of their safety is paramount. Monitoring by international bodies, particularly UN agencies, is vital in facilitating this aspect. Without adequate security measures, the prospect of voluntary repatriation remains a distant dream. 
It is essential that upon their return, the Rohingya enjoy equal rights and privileges as Myanmar citizens. The international community must pressure the Myanmar government to enact laws granting full citizenship and equal rights to the Rohingya.
Furthermore, any repatriation process should ensure reparations, compensation, and acknowledgment of past atrocities. The international community has largely failed to support the Rohingya's return to their homeland; it is time for significant action to achieve a dignified and lasting resolution. 
China and India must prioritize the broader regional implications of the Rohingya crisis over their narrow strategic interests. This issue extends beyond Bangladesh and has the potential for regional destabilization. A collaborative international response is needed, with pressure placed on the Myanmar government to facilitate the safe return of the Rohingya to Rakhine State. 
The past seven years have seen varying degrees of international involvement in the Rohingya issue, mostly sparked by Bangladesh's efforts to politicize the matter on the global stage. As attention shifts to other global crises, the severity of the Rohingya situation must not be overlooked. 
Despite claims from the international community that Rohingyas refuse to return due to the unwelcoming environment in Rakhine State, the Rohingya believe that without guarantees of citizenship, recognition of their ethnic identity, land rights, and justice for genocide, returning may expose them to renewed military persecution. 
The international community must persist in pressuring Myanmar to create conducive conditions for the Rohingya’s return, while Bangladesh continues to seek solutions in collaboration with global sentiment. This concerted effort to address the Rohingya crisis is justified, even as Bangladesh faces its own economic and developmental hurdles. 
Although international assistance has dwindled in recent years, recent commitments such as South Korea's $10 million humanitarian aid demonstrate the potential for support. To effectively host Rohingya refugees, Bangladesh needs enhanced international aid and renewed commitments to assistance. The primary goal must remain the safe repatriation of the Rohingya to Myanmar. .
On this seventh anniversary of the crisis, the international community must urgently and seriously engage in resolving this issue.
---
*Freelance writer based in Dhaka 

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.