Skip to main content

Equal representation? Elite dominance 'undermining' essence of democracy

Bhabani Shankar Nayak* 

The reality of Western democracy is structured in such a way that it effectively excludes many people from meaningful participation in decision-making processes. While citizens do vote and participate in elections, this engagement often serves as a veneer of inclusivity and equal opportunity that masks the underlying dominance of elites within the political system.
Despite the semblance of democratic participation, the political structure is heavily influenced and controlled by a small group of elites who have the power to shape policies and allocate resources in ways that primarily serve their own interests.
This elite dominance undermines the core democratic principle of equal representation and results in a political landscape where the voices of ordinary citizens are marginalised by the so-called democratic governments and states in Europe and America.
The concentration of power among elites leads to a political process that is less responsive to the needs and desires of the broader population. Instead, it tends to prioritise the agendas of those with significant economic and social influence.
This dynamic perpetuates inequality and fosters a sense of disenfranchisement among the general populace, who may feel that their votes and voices do not translate into actual influence over the governance of their countries.
The principles of democratic governance -- transparency, accountability, the rule of law, and inclusiveness -- are increasingly eroding within Western political systems. Despite the theoretical framework supporting broader political participation and fairer representation, the fundamental nature of capitalist states in Europe and America remains unchanged.
This persistent decline highlights a critical issue: the mechanisms designed to ensure a vibrant democracy are failing to counterbalance the entrenched power structures within these societies.
Even as citizens engage in elections and other forms of political participation, their ability to influence substantive policy decisions is severely limited. This discrepancy underscores a troubling trend where democratic ideals are subverted by economic interests of few capitalists.
In Western democracies, the alignment of government policies with the interests of capitalist corporations rather than those of the general populace is evident. This alignment manifests in legislation and regulatory frameworks that often prioritise corporate profitability and market stability over social welfare and equitable resource distribution.
The interests of ordinary citizens are sidelined, and their needs and aspirations are inadequately represented. The foundational principles of democracy are destroyed as a result of which citizens are no longer the shareholders of western democracy.
The so-called Western democratic countries, which often engage in imperialist wars, promote conflicts, and impose sanctions under the pretext of exporting democracy to countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, are experiencing a significant decline in their own democratic values and practices.
This situation highlights a profound irony and exposes the inherent contradictions within their political systems. The tragedy of these undemocratic foundations lies in their persistent assault on the very democratic values they claim to uphold.
While advocating for democracy abroad, these nations frequently undermine democratic principles at home. This duality not only erodes the credibility of Western democracies but also reveals the farcical nature of their commitment to genuine democratic ideals.
As these countries continue to prioritize geopolitical interests over the promotion of authentic democracy, the gap between their rhetoric and reality widens. This ongoing hypocrisy challenges the legitimacy of their democratic institutions and calls into question their role as global champions of democracy.
Consequently, it is imperative to critically examine and address these contradictions to foster a more genuine and consistent approach to democratic governance both domestically and internationally.
The so-called Western governments seemingly have the financial resources to engage in wars, military interventions and conflicts in various countries across Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Eastern Europe.
However, these same governments often fall short when it comes to investing in the critical infrastructures of health, education, and employment within their own nations. This disparity reveals a troubling prioritisation of resources.
Significant amounts of money are allocated to defence budgets and military operations, ostensibly to promote interests of global corporations in the name of global stability or protect national interests.
Yet, when it comes to addressing pressing domestic issues, such as expanding healthcare services, improving educational systems, and creating meaningful employment opportunities, these governments often claim budgetary constraints.
The consequences of this democratic deficit and misallocation of resources are profound. Underfunded health systems struggle to provide adequate care, leading to disparities in health outcomes and accessibility.
Educational institutions face resource shortages, impacting the quality of education and future prospects for students. Meanwhile, the lack of investment in creating sustainable and meaningful employment opportunities contributes to economic inequality and social instability.
The growth of hunger, homelessness, food insecurity, unemployment, and poverty represent a democratic disgrace for the so-called developed capitalist countries, where democracy is sacrificed to uphold the interests of corporate capitalism.
In these nations, the gap between the wealthy elite and the average citizen continues to widen, highlighting the failure of democratic systems to address the fundamental needs of their populations.
Despite the immense wealth and resources available in these countries, a significant portion of the population struggles with basic necessities. This stark contrast reveals the extent to which democratic ideals have been compromised in favour of maintaining and expanding corporate power and profits.
The prevalence of hunger and food insecurity is particularly alarming in affluent societies. Many individuals and families face difficulty accessing nutritious food, leading to widespread health problems and diminished quality of life.
Similarly, homelessness and inadequate housing conditions reflect the inability of the system to provide for its citizens, despite the presence of vast economic resources.
In Western democracies, alignment of government policies with the interests of capitalists  rather than those of the general populace is evident
Unemployment and underemployment further exacerbate these issues of individual dignity, as individuals are unable to secure stable, well-paying jobs that allow them to support themselves and their families. The resulting poverty traps many in a cycle of deprivation, with limited opportunities for upward mobility.
These social and economic issues in western countries are symptoms of a broader political problem: the prioritisation of corporate capitalism over the well-being of the populace.
Policies and practices that favour large corporations and the wealthy elite often come at the expense of the broader citizenry, undermining the principles of fairness, equity, and representation that are supposed to underpin democratic governance.
Such a situation not only calls for a re-evaluation of national priorities but also highlights the urgent need for mass struggle to deepen radical democracy and reclaim citizenship rights in western Europe and America.
This mass mobilisation can serve as a powerful force to challenge and change the existing power dynamics. By advocating for more equitable distribution of resources and greater public participation in decision-making processes, citizens can work towards a political system that truly represents their interests.
The push for radical democracy involves creating mechanisms for more direct citizen involvement, ensuring that policies and practices reflect the will of the majority rather than the interests of a privileged few. It requires transparency, accountability, and a commitment to social justice. Only through sustained collective action can citizens reclaim their rights and create a more just and equitable society.
These challenges also require a fundamental re-evaluation of the relationship between democracy and capitalism. It is essential to implement policies that ensure economic justice, such as fair wages, affordable housing, accessible healthcare, and robust social safety nets. It is vital to curb corporate influence in politics and promote greater transparency and accountability within the government.
The restoring of the integrity of democracy in these developed capitalist countries involves reclaiming it from the clutches of corporate interests and redirecting its focus towards serving the needs and rights of all citizens. By doing so, it is possible to build a society that is more just, equitable, and reflective of true democratic values.
---
*London Metropolitan University

Comments

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

What's behind Donald Trump's 'narco-state' accusation against Venezuela

By Manolo De Los Santos  The US government has revived its campaign to label Venezuela a "narco-state", accusing its top leadership of drug trafficking and slapping hefty bounties on their heads for capture. This campaign, which only momentarily took a backseat, is a strategic fabrication, not a factual assessment. This accusation, particularly amplified under the Trump Administration, is a calculated smokescreen to justify a long-standing agenda: the overthrow of the Venezuelan government and the seizure of its vast oil and mineral resources. A closer examination of the facts reveals a country that has actively fought drug trafficking on its own terms and a US government with a clear and consistent history of destabilizing independent countries in Latin America.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857  By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman*  Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”