NIA raid on alleged Maoist's Kerala residence: 'Attempts to punish those who voice criticism'

By Harsh Thakor*

On August 13th, the Indian National Investigation Agency (NIA) conducted a raid on the residence of Murali Kannampilly, who is accused of being a Maoist leader known as Ajith, in Kochi, Kerala. Murali Kannampilly has a history of legal troubles; he was previously arrested in May 2015 and served four years in Pune's Yerwada jail before being released in 2019. Following his initial arrest, several other alleged Maoists, including individuals from Kerala, were implicated, with the case initially overseen by the Telangana police.

However, as of January 2024, the NIA has taken over the investigation. At approximately 6 am, NIA officials arrived at Murali's home. Without obtaining prior permission, a group of eight officials forcibly entered the premises in Thevaikkal, despite Murali's request for his lawyer to be present during the raid. Following this, the NIA team commenced their investigation.

This is not the first instance of a raid; Murali's home had been searched previously, and he had faced interrogation. Unable to build a substantial legal case against him, the authorities seem to be using intimidation tactics against the activist.

Murali, a 62-year-old heart patient who lives alone, previously spent four years in Yerwada jail and was implicated in a case dating back to 1976 in Kayanna. His targeting appears to be a deliberate action by a proto-fascist state aiming to silence dissenting voices.

Over the decades, Murali has been engaged in political activism, steadfastly opposing neo-fascism. His writings on caste and revolutionary theory have posed a significant challenge to the Brahmanical Hindutva fascist agenda, as he advocates for the rights of marginalized and oppressed communities.

This situation underscores the inherent nature of the NIA. Although it identifies itself as a national "investigation agency," its operations align closely with Brahmanical Hindutva fascism, aimed at suppressing dissenting voices by labeling democratic and pro-people activities as "Maoist."

The state exploits terms such as "Maoists" and "urban naxals" to implement harsh anti-terror laws that infringe on the fundamental rights of those accused. By associating all dissent with Maoist ideology, the state attempts to punish those who voice criticism.

The space for dissent, organization, and protest is rapidly diminishing. Since 2019, numerous journalists, writers, students, educators, lawyers, and democratic rights activists have faced false accusations from the state under various legal provisions, including the IPC, UAPA, Telangana Public Security Act, and Arms Act.

---

*Freelance journalist

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup* Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Territorial greed of Trump, Xi Jinping, and Putin could make 2026 toxic

By N.S. Venkataraman* The year 2025 closed with bloody conflicts across nations and groups, while the United Nations continued to appear ineffective—reduced to a debate forum with little impact on global peace and harmony.

Search This Blog