Skip to main content

In struggle for Pakistan, Muslims 'acted in intoxication' of being India's ex-rulers

By Osman Sher* 

Ask anybody in the Indian Subcontinent or even globally: “who is responsible for the division of India in 1947”. The unequivocal reply would be: “the Muslim League led by MA Jinnah”. Prima facie, yes, but analyzing it deeply we would find it as a doubtful answer.  
Firstly, in 1947 the British were the strongest link in the chain of three contenders of power; they had 100% authority as the owner of the Government and armed forces. In fact, it was the British Parliament that had ultimately partitioned the country. The Hindus, comprising three quarters of the population, were the strongest voice to decide the fate of the country while the Muslim population of India was merely a quarter, hence the weakest link. 
Secondly, a demand for separation is made when the minority community is oppressed by the majority. In this case, the majority had not yet been in power and they never had the occasion to brutalize the minority. Therefore, the Muslims had not been put in such a disparate situation as to make a serious demand for the division of the motherland. It was a hollow slogan. 
Thirdly, the break-up of a country is an extreme measure and the people who wanted it, and those who did not, both had to plunge in blood-baths to achieve their respective objectives. In this case all the concerned parties agreed to the division of the country without undergoing the necessary trauma. 
Therefore, in the scenario described above, does it not appear strange that the smallest “pistol” (in the words of Jinnah) had won the battle despite the common belief that the Hindus and the British were against it? 
In fact, had any of the three parties resisted the division of the country, the Partition would never have happened. So, it seemed all were complicit. 
In their struggle for Pakistan, the Muslims had acted as they were in intoxication of being the ex-rulers of India and were not ready to play a second fiddle, without realizing that the days of kingship and colonialism were gone and democracy had dawned in the world as a means of governance. 
However, despite the Pakistan Resolution of 1940 (repeat resolution), Muslim League’s continued negotiations for more rights and privileges in a united India, and the subsequent acceptance of the Cabinet Mission Plan, clearly demonstrate that they had no conviction for Pakistan, and wished India to remain united. Jinnah had earlier presented himself as a great nationalist, earning the appellation of “Ambassador of Hindu Muslim Unity”. 
When the Muslim League had invited Muhammad Ali Jinnah to join them, he did in 1913 without giving up his membership of the Congress. He joined the Muslim League with a “solemn preliminary covenant that loyalty to the Muslim League and the Muslim interest would in no way and no time imply even the shadow of disloyalty to the larger national cause (Indian nationalism), to which his life was dedicated”  (Sarojini Naidu, 'Muhammad Ali Jinnah: An Ambassador of Unity', See VH Hudson: "The Great Divide", Chapter 2).
Later, however disgruntled with the policies of the Congress, especially MK Gandhi’s mixing of religion in politics, he turned an advocate of Muslim interests. 
However, in the process of extracting more concessions for the Muslims, the project Pakistan materialized when he did not expect it to actually happen. He had, per force, to accept what had been thrust upon him: a “a maimed, mutilated, and moth-eaten" Pakistan. 
During the internecine fighting in which the Indians had been put by the British rulers, the attitude of the Hindus, even of as liberal and enlightened a person as Jawaharlal Nehru, seemed to be under the exhilaration of conquerors who had before them the sight of wresting their land back after centuries of subjugation and now it was their turn to have full freedom of action, conceding little to others. 
This sentiment is reflected in his own words. Michael Brecher writes in "Nehru, A political Biography":
"Flushed with success (in 1937 Provincial elections) the Congress adopted an imperious attitude to all other political parties, a ‘Himalayan blunder’, for which it was to pay dearly in the years to come. Nehru himself set the tone with his haughty remark in March 1937: ‘There are only two forces in India today, British imperialism, and Indian nationalism as represented by Congress’. 
"Jinnah was quick to retort: ‘No, there is a third party, the Mussulmans’. History was to bear him out." Further, while rejecting the Cabinet Mission Plan in the press conference in Bombay on 10 July 1946 he had said that the Congress would enter the Constituent Assembly “completely unfettered by agreement and free to meet all situations as they arose”.  
This rejection of the Plan, the last chance to have India undivided, has been described by Abul Kalam Azad in his book, "India Wins Freedom", as “one of those unfortunate events which change the course of history.” 
Muslims were not ready to play a second fiddle, without realizing that the days of kingship and colonialism were gone
Again, insisting the Congress for the last time not to accept the Partition Plan of 1947, Abul Kalam Azad had observed: “The verdict would then be that India was divided as much by the Muslim League as by the Congress”.  
Let us now have a look at the rapidity with which the British divided India.  On March 24, 1947, Lord Mountbatten was appointed as Viceroy with instructions from the Prime Minister Atlee to announce the British intention to leave India in June 1948 and to make the Indian politicians agree on a united India. The Viceroy was directed to report back to the Prime Minister by October 1947.   
Despite such an instruction, within a span of 5 weeks of his arrival, Mountbatten prepared the Partition Plan and sent it to London, which was discussed by the India Committee of Cabinet in the first week of May, 1947. After discussion, it was approved by the Cabinet and India’s freedom was announced by the All India Radio on June 2, 1947, jointly by Mountbatten, Nehru and Jinnah. 
The Bill for Indian Independence, was introduced in the House of Commons on July 4, and was passed on July 15. The House of Lords passed it on July 16, and the Bill received the Royal assent by a Royal Commission sitting in the House of Lords on July 18, 1947. 
The British policy of “divide and rule” had served its purpose well.  They were now leaving of their own because they had reached their strength’s end to hold on to India. They did not even wait for their original date of June 1948 despite the fact that such a haste did not give the administration sufficient time for adequate preparation to cope with the subsequent large-scale massacre in Punjab despite the repeated warnings given by the Governor. 
Here the question arises: why the British broke India and that too helter-skelter? Whatever reason one may advance, but it was an irresponsible behavior on both accounts. The answer may be, firstly, that in June 1948 the British Government would have been fully occupied with another colony, Palestine, as reflected in the concern of the Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin. 
While discussing the Partition Plan of India he put the condition that he would agree to it provided the British Government took “our lads” (British soldiers) out of Palestine (William Fracis Hare, Foreign Secretary for India, Memoires of the Earl of Listowel, Chapter 9). Probably, Bevin intended to facilitate the unilateral declaration of independence by the Jews for Israel in May 1948. 
Secondly, the British knew about Jinnah’s medical condition that he might die by June 1948 (he actually died in September 1948) of acute tuberculosis without whom the idea of Pakistan would fizzle out. 
Anyway, Mountbatten was rewarded with the position of the first Governor-General of India and the British got a pre-arranged justification for the creation of Israel on religious grounds. 
---
*Retired  civil servant of Government of Pakistan, and ex-employee of CENTO, United Nations, British Commonwealth and SAARC, originally from Bihar. Books published in India: "The India of Ancient Times" (Vikas); "The Culture of Tolerance, A Study of Indian History" (Originals); "India as Seen by Early Muslim Chroniclers" (Regency);  "Religion, God, and Islam" (Regency);  "Hindustan, Ibtedai Muslim Mourekheen ki Nazaron Mein" in Urdu (Pharos Media)

Comments

TRENDING

How Hindutva and the Taliban mirror each other in power and ideology

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  The recent visit of Taliban-appointed Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi to India and the warm reception extended to him by the Modi government have raised questions about India’s foreign policy direction. The decision appears to lend legitimacy to the Taliban regime, which continues to suppress democratic aspirations in Afghanistan. 

History, culture and literature of Fatehpur, UP, from where Maulana Hasrat Mohani hailed

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Maulana Hasrat Mohani was a member of the Constituent Assembly and an extremely important leader of our freedom movement. Born in Unnao district of Uttar Pradesh, Hasrat Mohani's relationship with nearby district of Fatehpur is interesting and not explored much by biographers and historians. Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri has written a book on Maulana Hasrat Mohani and Fatehpur. The book is in Urdu.  He has just come out with another important book, 'Hindi kee Pratham Rachna: Chandayan' authored by Mulla Daud Dalmai.' During my recent visit to Fatehpur town, I had an opportunity to meet Dr Mohammad Ismail Azad Fatehpuri and recorded a conversation with him on issues of history, culture and literature of Fatehpur. Sharing this conversation here with you. Kindly click this link. --- *Human rights defender. Facebook https://www.facebook.com/vbrawat , X @freetohumanity, Skype @vbrawat

Celebrating 125 yr old legacy of healthcare work of missionaries

Vilas Shende, director, Mure Memorial Hospital By Moin Qazi* Central India has been one of the most fertile belts for several unique experiments undertaken by missionaries in the field of education and healthcare. The result is a network of several well-known schools, colleges and hospitals that have woven themselves into the social landscape of the region. They have also become a byword for quality and affordable services delivered to all sections of the society. These institutions are characterised by committed and compassionate staff driven by the selfless pursuit of improving the well-being of society. This is the reason why the region has nursed and nurtured so many eminent people who occupy high positions in varied fields across the country as well as beyond. One of the fruits of this legacy is a more than century old iconic hospital that nestles in the heart of Nagpur city. Named as Mure Memorial Hospital after a British warrior who lost his life in a war while defending his cou...

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

Creative destruction? The myth of ‘better capitalism’ behind the 2025 Economics Nobel

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak *  The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has awarded the 2025 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel to Joel Mokyr , Philippe Aghion , and Peter Howitt “for having explained innovation-driven economic growth .” According to the Nobel announcement on October 13 , one half of the prize goes to Professor Joel Mokyr “for having identified the prerequisites for sustained growth through technological progress ,” while the other half is shared by Professors Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt “for the theory of sustained growth through creative destruction .”

Caste, employment, and Bihar elections: The tragedy of Musahar child labourers

​By Sunil Kumar*  ​ Bihar 's biggest festival of 'democracy'—the elections—has begun with its full clamor. The announcements from both the ruling party and the opposition create the illusion that the state's suffering will vanish in an instant, and the lives of the people of Bihar will be greatly enriched. As in every election, this time too, caste and employment are emerging as key issues. Every party is unrolling its bundle of promises. But amidst this electoral noise, there are stories that are deliberately kept 'quiet'—because both the ruling party and the opposition benefit from their silence. One such story is the death of four Musahar children.