Skip to main content

The President who dared: How K.R. Narayanan challenged caste and power

By Jag Jivan 

As India continues to reflect on the legacy of its leaders, the name of Dr. K.R. Narayanan stands tall as a beacon of courage, integrity, and social justice. Born into a Dalit family in a thatched hut in Kerala in 1920, Dr. Narayanan rose from extreme poverty to become the 10th President of India – and the first from the Scheduled Castes.
His presidency wasn't ceremonial – it was transformative. One of the most defining moments of his tenure came when he returned a file recommending the appointment of 10 Supreme Court judges. His objection? Not a single nominee belonged to the SC, ST, OBC, or minority communities. His powerful question — “Why is there not even one judge from the marginalized communities?” — shook the corridors of power. It paved the way for the eventual appointment of Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, India's first Dalit Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Dr. Narayanan didn't stop there. He opposed the Vajpayee government's proposal to award Bharat Ratna to V.D. Savarkar. In another bold move, he rejected the Centre’s recommendation to impose President’s Rule in Uttar Pradesh. His principled stands made him one of the rare Presidents who used the power of the office to uphold constitutional morality.
Despite such a legacy, many in North India – particularly among SC, ST, and OBC communities – remain unaware of his contributions. His life disproves the narrative that Dalits were historically unfit for education or leadership. In fact, Dr. Narayanan completed his MA in English literature in first class in 1948 and later studied at the London School of Economics, where he finished a three-year course in just two years.
Upon returning to India, with a recommendation letter from LSE professor Harold Laski, he met Prime Minister Nehru, who appointed him to the Indian Foreign Service. Dr. Narayanan served as ambassador to several countries, including China and the United States, and later became the Vice-Chancellor of Jawaharlal Nehru University and then India’s Vice President.
His early career was marred by caste discrimination. Despite academic excellence, he was denied a lecturer post at Maharaja’s College in Travancore simply because of his caste. Years later, he would address that same university as the Vice President of India, saying, “I don’t see any of those casteists here today who once denied me a job.”
In 1946, he met Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Delhi, who helped him secure a position in the Foreign Office. This meeting marked the beginning of a career that would inspire generations of marginalized Indians.
During his presidency, there were even reports of a foiled attempt to poison him during a foreign trip, orchestrated allegedly by right-wing elements. Despite such threats, Dr. Narayanan continued to speak boldly for the downtrodden.
His refusal to run for a second term was perhaps a reflection of his unwillingness to compromise with the rising tide of majoritarianism and corporate servitude in Indian politics. He had contested and won the presidency as a general category candidate – a silent yet powerful assertion of his belief in equality.
Dr. K.R. Narayanan was not just a Dalit president – he was the people's president. He showed how the highest constitutional office could be a force for justice. His legacy calls upon today’s leaders, especially those from marginalized backgrounds, to rise with the same courage and clarity.
The present President – and indeed all in positions of power – would do well to learn from his example.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.