Skip to main content

Har Ghar Tiranga a BJP move to 'utilise' symbols rooted in public consciousness for divisive agenda

By Ram Puniyani* 
As we approached the Independence Day 2024, the NDA Government called for the third edition of "Har Ghar Tiranga" (Tricolor in every home). This initiative first launched in 2022 under the BJP government has drawn attention, especially considering that the RSS, the ideological parent of the BJP, historically opposed the Tricolor as the national flag until January 26, 2001. 
On that day, three activists—Baba Mendhe, Ramesh Kalambe, and Dilip Chatwani—along with others, entered RSS premises in Reshimbagh and hoisted the national flag amidst patriotic slogans, resulting in their arrest. They were later acquitted, marking the end of a 51-year period during which the RSS did not display the Tricolor. 
The Tricolor, particularly with the Charkha, had emerged as a powerful symbol during India's freedom struggle. In 1929, Jawaharlal Nehru, then President of the Indian National Congress, called upon the nation to observe January 26 as Independence Day by hoisting the Tricolor. 
In contrast, K.B. Hedgewar, the founder of the RSS, issued a directive on January 21, 1930, advocating for the "Bhagva Jhanda" (Saffron Flag), instructing members to gather at their local shakhas for a salute to the saffron flag. Their rationale was that the saffron flag represented a Hindu nation deeply rooted in tradition, negating the need for a new flag. 
Nonetheless, the Tricolor was embraced by most participants in the freedom movement, with the exceptions being the Muslim League (which favored the green flag) and the RSS (which supported the saffron flag). Similarly, Vinayak Savarkar of the Hindu Mahasabha also advocated for the saffron flag. M.S. Golwalkar, the second chief of the RSS, articulated the organization’s position regarding the flag, asserting that the saffron banner wholly represented Indian culture and embodied divinity. Over the years, the RSS's affiliated publications consistently produced editorials opposing the Tricolor, championing the saffron flag instead. 
The primary flag committee, chaired by Dr. Rajendra Prasad, included prominent figures such as C. Rajagopalachari, Maulana Azad, K. M. Munshi, and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. After thorough deliberation, they adopted the Tricolor, modifying it by replacing the Charkha with the Ashoka Chakra featuring 24 spokes. In the Constituent Assembly, Nehru framed the flag as a continuation of India’s rich historical and cultural legacy and a beacon of hope for the future. His poignant address recognized the immense sacrifices made by Indians to rid themselves of colonial oppression, connecting the flag to the values of peace and international harmony represented by Emperor Ashoka. Nehru emphasized: 
"We envisioned a flag that would symbolize the spirit of the nation and our diverse traditions, which have evolved over thousands of years. This flag embodies not just an emblem but also the name of Asoka, a name of immense significance in both Indian and world history." 
Golwalkar, in his writings, notably in Bunch of Thoughts, criticized the choice of the Tricolor as the national flag
Despite this historical context, the RSS and Sangh Parivar have continued to promote a Hindu nationalist agenda. Golwalkar, in his writings, notably in "Bunch of Thoughts," criticized the choice of the Tricolor as the national flag. He lamented: 
“Our leaders have established a new flag. Why was this necessary? It reflects a drifting and imitative mindset... Once, we had a flag of our own, rich in history. Why this emptiness?” 
Savarkar also rejected the Tricolor, calling for its boycott and declaring on September 22, 1941, that the ultimate representation of Hindudom lay in the Mahasabha flag, which featured the ancient symbols of the Hindu race. 
In essence, the "Har Ghar Tiranga" initiative can be viewed as a strategic move by the BJP government. While adapting to changing times, it maintains its commitment to Hindu nationalism. The BJP employs a dual strategy regarding symbols: adopting those deeply rooted in the public consciousness while simultaneously promoting celebrations that drive a divisive narrative. 
For example, the designation of August 14 as "Partition Horrors Remembrance Day" seeks to highlight the suffering of Hindus during partition, while remaining silent on the Muslim community’s experiences. Additionally, marking December 25 as "Good Governance Day" in honor of Atal Bihari Vajpayee represents a deliberate effort to overshadow Christmas celebrations. 
Furthermore, the Tricolor has been utilized as a tool of intimidation, with groups of youths parading through Muslim-majority areas bearing the flag, or hoisting it on mosques during festivals such as Ram Navami. 
The broader intent behind the "Har Ghar Tiranga" campaign appeared to be more about optics than a sincere dedication to the values of sacrifice, peace, and unity in diversity that the flag symbolizes. 
--- 
*Political commentator 

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Territorial greed of Trump, Xi Jinping, and Putin could make 2026 toxic

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The year 2025 closed with bloody conflicts across nations and groups, while the United Nations continued to appear ineffective—reduced to a debate forum with little impact on global peace and harmony.