Skip to main content

Campaign group counters BJP’s claims on tribal demographics and ‘infiltration’ in Jharkhand

By A Representative 

The Democracy Watch Campaign has strongly refuted recent claims by BJP leaders alleging a rise in Bangladeshi infiltration in Jharkhand, decreasing tribal populations, and instances of "love jihad" and "land jihad." BJP leaders have claimed that since the formation of Jharkhand, the tribal population in Santhal Pargana has declined by 16% while the Muslim population has increased by 13%. MP Nishikant Dubey even stated in Parliament that tribals in Santhal Pargana fell from 36% in 2000 to 26% today due to Bangladeshi infiltration.
However, these claims are not supported by official data. As per the Census, the tribal population in the Jharkhand region was 36% in 1951, which declined to 27.67% in 1991 and 26.21% in 2011. The Muslim population grew from 12.18% in 1991 to 14.53% in 2011. In Santhal Pargana, the tribal population fell slightly from 29.91% in 2001 to 28.11% in 2011. The BJP’s claim of a 16% drop is false.
The sharpest decline in tribal population occurred between 1951 and 1991. This was mainly due to large-scale migration of non-tribals from neighboring states, especially in mining and urban areas. Displacement, lack of jobs, and poor health services have also forced tribal migration, impacting population growth. Tribals have a lower annual growth rate and higher mortality due to malnutrition and inadequate healthcare.
On Bangladeshi infiltration, the Modi government has consistently stated in Parliament that it has no data on the number of Bangladeshi infiltrators in Jharkhand. The 2.15% increase in the Muslim population in Santhal Pargana between 2001 and 2011 is minimal and does not support claims of large-scale infiltration.
The BJP’s use of the term "love jihad" has also been challenged. The government has admitted in Parliament that there is no such legal term, and no case has been registered by central agencies. Moreover, a 2013 study found that only 5.7% of marriages in Jharkhand are interfaith, showing the rarity of such cases.
The campaign pointed out that the real issue is the illegal acquisition of tribal land. Violations of CNT and SPT Acts have allowed non-tribals to take over tribal lands, especially in urban areas. The BJP’s use of communal terms like "land jihad" seeks to distract from this reality. Ironically, the same BJP governments forcibly acquired tribal land for projects like the Adani power plant, changed state energy policies to benefit corporates, and supplied electricity to Bangladesh while ignoring Santhal Pargana.
While the BJP claims to be concerned about tribal demography, it has opposed or blocked key tribal demands like the Sarna Code, 27% reservation for OBCs, and a domicile policy based on land records. It has also avoided conducting a caste census, which would reveal the current status of various communities.
The Democracy Watch Campaign demands that the state government take action against those spreading misinformation and communal narratives. It also calls for serious public discussions on the real issues affecting tribals in Jharkhand, as originally raised by the Jharkhand movement.

Comments

TRENDING

Why Venezuela govt granting amnesty to political prisoners isn't a sign of weakness

By Guillermo Barreto   On 20 May 2017, during a violent protest planned by sectors of the Venezuelan opposition, 21-year-old Orlando Figuera was attacked by a mob that accused him of being a Chavista. After being stabbed, he was doused with gasoline and set on fire in front of everyone present. Young Orlando was admitted to a hospital with multiple wounds and burns covering 80 percent of his body and died 15 days later, on 4 June.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes. 

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.