Skip to main content

Will Rahul disqualification trigger next version of JP movement to 'rediscover' democracy?

By Harshavardhan Purandare, Sandeep Pandey* 

Rahul Gandhi's expulsion has come at a politically convenient time for Modi government with general elections due one year from now . This time, our judiciary chooses to go for harsh punishment for verbal jibes which appear innocuous to common sense; and the government gets the opportunity to attack and suppress the opposition voices more and more. 
Judicial activism in our country fails to address many issues of justice, stays dormant on striking issues like Kashmir, but then suddenly some court verdict pops up to change the entire political discourse. The political churning for next general elections has begun with this verdict against Rahul. 
Rahul Gandhi may have come to the center stage in the media because of this Surat court verdict, he may or may not get a relief from higher courts, but if he continues to be unseated from the Lok Sabha for the rest of the term and his chances of being the opposition's candidate for prime ministership become doubtful, then the dynamics in opposition space changes a lot.
The weakened Congress party has become a 'very necessary but not sufficient at all' force on the opposition side in the last ten years. Whether Rahul will be able to strongly stand before Modi as a prime ministerial candidate has been a point of discussion within Congress as well as other regional anti-BJP parties, again and again. This debate holds true even today. 
To his credit, Rahul himself looks detached about whether he becomes prime minister or not. While Modi government attacks the very foundation of our democracy in systematic and strategic ways, Rahul sees himself in a bigger long term role of saving Indian democracy. His recent hand extension to civil society leaders during Bharat Jodo Yatra indicates that he is ready to break out of the traditional Congress framework. 
His not being a prime ministerial candidate may be a blessing in disguise, as the opposition unity will become more feasible without the binary of Modi vs. Rahul. This binary may have trapped the potential of opposition unity and limited the chances of its rejuvenation. 
While the government tries to compensate for its non-performance by killing the competition and retaining power by degrading the quality of our democracy and thrusting its religious ideology against the Idea of India that has shaped us after independence, the opposition now has the historic responsibility of reinventing Indian democracy.
The attempt to just restore it may now not be politically enough. The opposition will need not only to resist the current religious hegemony, but also offer a new deal to youth and excluded Indians and catch the imagination for charting the new path. The binary of faces has to be replaced by offering the new political agenda to people at large.
The Congress party will have to give up its ambition and temptation of ruling this country once more. It must play the role of a junior partner or merely a supporter in states where regional parties are strong. A very simple understanding among the opposition parties should bring them all together on a platform, and that is, that the party with the largest number of MPs in Lok Sabha should stake the claim for PM’s post after the elections.
India has witnessed the renewal of political agendas from the opposition side. It generally takes a nation wide political movement to renew the agenda, just election campaigns are not enough to chart a new path. JP's 'Sampoorna Kranti' was one idea that generated such a political movement across the country. It rattled the Congress party which was powerful then. 
History of country has demonstrated people do rise up to save democracy; they’ll do it again when threat perception becomes real
If the Modi government has imposed an undeclared and tactful emergency on India, the response also has to be similar to that of the next version of the JP movement. This version will be placed in post globalization India of today when our democratic institutions are fast losing their potency to empower the common Indians. 
Rahul Gandhi alone may not be qualified to occupy that spot, firstly because of the feudal baggage of the old Congress partisans, and secondly, it requires a 'fakir' branding like Gandhi or JP to create mass appeal among the underprivileged Indians. The big ideas of this movement will set the agenda. The economic justice for common Indians, redesigning and strengthening of the federal structure in favor of states, attacking and bridging the inequalities of all kinds, and environmental sustainability might become the pillars of such a new movement.
While the larger Sangh Parivar might be feeling elated that the strongest contender to Narendra Modi in the 2024 general elections, nationally, has been removed clearing the way for Modi’s return to power, they’ll be foolish if they are complacent. For the movement for independence of this country and then for revival of democracy, when it was eclipsed for two years by Emergency rule, was led by leaders, Mahatma Gandhi and Jayaprakash Narayan, respectively, who were least interested in occupying a post through elections. 
Priyanka Gandhi in her recent speech has lamented about people not rising in revolt. She has rightly reminded the country of the sacrifices of her family members in nurturing democracy. While people may not rise up in support of Rahul or against Advani, the history of the country has demonstrated that they do rise up to save democracy and they’ll do it again when the threat perception will become real. 
But she should remember that the biggest Gandhi who sacrificed his life for the country was Mahatma Gandhi and his life was taken by a person associated with Sangh Parivar ideology. The politics of Hindutva can never wash away the taint of this ghastly and cowardly act. The country will have to be reminded that one Hindutva activist took the life of most well known Sanatani Hindu respected not only by Hindus but people all over the world. The politics of Hindutva is a blot on the name of liberal Hinduism, practiced by most Hindus as a way of life and recognized as such by the world for this special quality of assimilation.
It is because of Gandhian brand of politics that this country got a Constitution which ensured that secularism, socialism and democracy will thrive and values of liberty, justice, equality and fraternity will be held highly. While this idea of India is compatible with liberal Hinduism it is an anathema for Hindutva and that is why erosion of these ideals and values has taken place very fast under the BJP rule.
So the real fight is to preserve these ideals and values. It is to save the idea of India from the assassins of Mahatma Gandhi and their sympathizers.
*Both associated with Socialist Party (India); Prof Pandey is Magsaysay award winning activist-academic



'Enough evidence' in Indian tradition to support legal basis for same-sex marriage

By Iyce Malhotra, Joseph Mathai, Sandeep Chachra*  The ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court on same-sex marriage provides space for much-needed conversations on issues that have hitherto remained “invisible” or engaged with patriarchal locker room humour. We must recognize that people with diverse sexualities and complex gender identities have faced discrimination, stigma and decades of oppression. Their issues have mainly remained buried in dominant social discourse, and many view them with deep insecurities.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Victim of communal violence, Christians in Manipur want Church leadership to speak up

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  The first eleven days of May 2023 have, in many ways, been a defining period of Indian history! Plenty has happened in a rapid-fire stream of events. Ironically, each one of them are indicators of how crimes and the criminalisation of society has become the ‘new norm’; these include, the May Day rallies with a focus on the four labour codes which are patently against the rights of workers; the U S Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) released its Annual Report on 1 May stating that conditions for religious freedom in India “continued to worsen in 2022”; the continued protest by the Indian women wrestlers at Jantar Mantar for the expulsion of the chief of the Indian Wrestlers Federation on very serious allegations; the Elections in Karnataka on 10 May (with communalism and corruption as the mainstay); the release of the fake, derogative and insensitive film ‘The Kerala Story’; the release of World Free Press Index on 3 May which places India

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Unlike other revolutionaries, Hindutva icon wrote 5 mercy petitions to British masters

By Shamsul Islam*  The Hindutva icon VD Savarkar of the RSS-BJP rulers of India submitted not one, two,or three but five mercy petitions to the British masters! Savarkarites argue: “There are no evidences to prove that Savarkar collaborated with the British for his release from jail. In fact, his appeal for release was a ruse. He was well aware of the political developments outside and wanted to be part of it. So he kept requesting for his release. But the British authorities did not trust him a bit” (YD Phadke, ‘A complex Hero’, "The Indian Expres"s, August 31, 2004)

Delhi HC rules in favour of retired Air Force officer 'overcharged' for Covid treatment

By Rosamma Thomas*  In a decision of May 22, 2023, the Delhi High Court ruled in favour of petitioner Group Captain Suresh Khanna who was under treatment at CK Birla Hospital, Gurugram, between April 28 and May 5, 2021, for a period of eight days, for Covid-19 pneumonia. The petitioner had to pay Rs 3,55,286 as treatment costs, but the Ex-Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS) only reimbursed him for Rs 1,83,748, on the basis of government-approved rates. 

Polygamy in India "down" in 45 yrs: Muslims' from 5.7 to 2.55%, Hindus' 5.8 to 1.77%, "common" in SCs, STs

By Rajiv Shah Amidst All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) justifying polygamy, saying it “meets social and moral needs and the provision for it stems from concern and sympathy for women”, facts suggest the the practice is down from 5.7 per cent of Muslim families in 1961 to 2.55 per cent in 2006.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

India joining US sponsored trade pillar to hurt Indian farmers, 'promote' GM seeds, food

Counterview Desk  As many as 32 civil society organisations (CSOs), in a letter to Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal on the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) and India joining the trade pillar, have said that its provisions will allow the US to ensure a more favourable regulatory regime “for enhancing its exports of genetically modified (GM) seeds and GM food”, underlining, it will “significantly hurt the livelihoods of Indian farmers.”

Modi govt 'wholly untrustworthy' on Covid data, censored criticism on pandemic: Lancet

By Rajiv Shah*   One of the world’s most prestigious health journals, brought out from England, has sharply criticised the Narendra Modi government for being “wholly untrustworthy on Covid-19 health data”, stating, the “official government figures place deaths at more than 530 000, while WHO excess death estimates for 2020 and 2021 are near 4·7 million.”