Skip to main content

Premature to predict implementation of ceasefure between Israel and Hamas

By Vikas Meshram* 
After nearly 15 months of war and several arduous rounds of negotiations, Hamas and Israel have agreed to a ceasefire. Amid the ongoing power transition in the United States, where leaders are vying to claim credit for ending the conflict, this agreement offers some respite to the people of Gaza, who have been grappling with a dire humanitarian crisis. Despite repeated efforts by the United Nations and initiatives from Islamic nations in the Middle East, peace talks have yet to yield lasting success. This war has claimed the lives of approximately 50,000 people, and rebuilding the destruction caused across various parts of Gaza might take decades.
While the agreement between Israel and Hamas on a ceasefire is significant, predicting its implementation is premature. Following the October 23 Hamas attack that deeply wounded Israel, the latter has grown weary of continuous fighting on multiple fronts. Yet, Arab nations continue to question Israel's credibility. Concerns arise as negotiations often derail before reaching their final stages, and a constant cycle of discussions and attacks persists. The future will determine the sincerity of both parties in adhering to this agreement.
Political opposition and divisions within the Israeli cabinet over the release of hostages persist. However, there is also a demand to provide relief to the Israeli military, exhausted after this prolonged war. Still, the agreement on a ceasefire has rekindled hopes for peace. While incumbent U.S. President Joe Biden and newly elected President Donald Trump are competing to claim credit for this deal, Iran is celebrating it as a victory for Palestinian resistance.
The recent agreement includes an Israeli military withdrawal from Gaza, the phased release of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners, and reconstruction efforts in Gaza. Additionally, displaced people from Gaza will be allowed to return. However, obstacles to delivering humanitarian aid to Gaza must still be overcome.
On October 7, 2023, a brutal Hamas attack killed 1,200 Israelis, with approximately 250 individuals taken hostage. Israel's retaliation was inevitable, but no one expected the conflict to last 15 months. Although some hostages were released and others died during fighting, the remaining hostages left the Netanyahu government under intense pressure. Hamas claims that Israeli attacks have killed around 50,000 people, as reported by its health ministry. While it is difficult to ascertain the number of Hamas fighters killed, countless women and children have lost their lives in this war. An estimated 2 million people have been displaced by the Gaza conflict, creating an unprecedented humanitarian crisis. Hospitals and schools, considered safe havens for refugees, were also targeted by Israeli strikes. Israel faces allegations of war crimes in the International Court of Justice.
As the situation begins to shift towards peace after a long time, the international community and the United Nations must oversee the agreement's implementation to ensure sustainable peace in the Middle East. War cannot be a substitute for peace. While Hamas initiated the conflict, those who were not responsible for it paid the highest price.
Doubts remain about whether this agreement will provide a lasting solution to the Palestinian crisis. However, the Palestinians, who have endured the horrors of war and the impact of climate shocks, will undoubtedly gain some relief. The ceasefire news brought thousands onto Gaza's streets, hoping for an end to daily bombings and gunfire. Despite lingering uncertainties, disagreements over the details of Israel's partial withdrawal and the list of hostages to be released were resolved at the last moment. The ceasefire officially began on Sunday.
Although this is not the end of the war, halting the violence is a significant relief for the 2.3 million Palestinians in Gaza. The agreement is expected to be implemented in three phases. In the first phase, Hamas will release 33 hostages, while Israel will free about 1,000 Palestinian security prisoners. In the second phase, further exchanges of hostages and prisoners will take place, and both sides will be required to cease hostilities permanently. The third phase will involve discussions on "the future course," including deliberations on who should govern Gaza.
Currently, both sides are focused on the first phase. Problems may arise when the next stage of negotiations begins. At the onset of this war, Israel set two goals for itself—eliminating Hamas and freeing the hostages. In the 15-month war, Israel weakened Hamas's terrorist infrastructure, but the group has survived and reestablished itself as a rebel force.
According to outgoing U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Hamas recruited as many fighters as it lost during the war. Israel's inability to destroy Hamas or aggressively rescue hostages raises serious questions about the IDF's military strategy in Gaza. This could be one reason Benjamin Netanyahu was compelled to accept the ceasefire. However, he has made no commitments to ending the war.
Hamas, on the other hand, demands Israel's complete withdrawal from Gaza. Despite potential obstacles, the ceasefire is a welcome development. It provides Gaza with much-needed relief and a platform for further negotiations. Post-war, Israel, Palestinians, and international mediators must work to bridge the gaps.
Israel is unlikely to accept any terms that leave Hamas as a dominant force in Gaza. Establishing a unified administration led by the internationally recognized Palestinian Authority and focusing on Gaza's reconstruction seems to be a more practical solution. However, for this plan to succeed and peace to prevail, Israel must be willing to withdraw all its forces from the Gaza Strip.
---
*Journalist

Comments

TRENDING

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative   A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Paper guarantees, real hardship: How budget 2026–27 abandons rural India

By Vikas Meshram   In the history of Indian democracy, the Union government’s annual budget has always carried great significance. However, the 2026–27 budget raises several alarming concerns for rural India. In particular, the vague provisions of the VBG–Ram Ji scheme and major changes to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) have put the future of rural workers at risk. A deeper reading of the budget reveals that these changes are not merely administrative but are closely tied to political and economic priorities that will have far-reaching consequences for millions of rural households.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram   In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.

Frugal funds, fading promises: Budget 2026 exposes shrinking space for minority welfare

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The Ministry of Minority Affairs was established in 2006 during the tenure of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, following the findings of the Sachar Committee, which documented that Muslims were among the most educationally and economically disadvantaged communities in India. The ministry was conceived as a corrective institutional response to deep structural inequalities faced by religious minorities, particularly Muslims, through focused policy interventions.