Skip to main content

No to free thought? How Gujarat's private universities are cowing down their students

By Rajiv Shah 
"Don't protest"—that's the message private universities across Gujarat seem to be conveying to their students. A senior professor told me that students at the university where he teaches are required to sign an undertaking promising not to engage in protests. "They simply sign the undertaking and hand it over to the university authorities," he said.
Calling the practice "absolutely shocking," the professor, who wished to remain anonymous for fear of repercussions, explained that this policy was introduced after several students protested a few years ago on an issue that could have embarrassed the Government of India. While the professor was unsure about the exact issue, an internet search suggests it might have been related to protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in 2019.
"The Gujarat government took the matter seriously and instructed university authorities to ensure that no such protests occur in the future. Not only were the protesting students made to sign undertakings, but it was also decided that every student admitted to the university must sign one," the professor revealed.
He emphasized that peaceful protests and freedom of expression are fundamental rights of students. He added, "I learned about this policy when students mentioned it to me, almost gleefully. I was shocked. Not a single student at the high-profile university where I teach has protested against signing such an undertaking."
When asked whether other universities had implemented similar policies, the professor said he was certain they must have done so, speculating that a circular may have been issued to this effect. "Protests are a way of fostering critical thinking—something students must learn. Expressing opinions, whether collectively or individually, is an essential part of education," he remarked.
When I asked for a copy of the circular, the professor said that no student seemed to have retained one or even taken a photograph of it. "They probably just signed it and submitted it without question. Unfortunately, there is no trace of resistance to this policy, not even anonymously on social media. The spirit of opposing injustice seems to have been subdued."

Comments

  1. Dr,Suhas Kolhekar,Virologist,Health Activist for Social and Climate Justice.January 16, 2025

    Universities are ment for nurturing the Critical thinking in Students.Asking for signign like this and mindlessly signing No to Protest,is simply disgusting.What else does one expect from Tadipar's and Feku's Gujarat.NIRMA is simply brainwashing the Youth in Gujarat.Friend wake up soon and protect your Future by saying a BIG NO ro such compulsions.You do have a Constitutional right to Freedom of expression and to express your Dissent from what the Authorities want to impose on you.Rise up.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Retired civil servants slam CJI’s remarks on environmental litigants

By A Representative   An open letter issued on May 22, 2026, by the Constitutional Conduct Group (CCG), comprising 71 retired civil servants from the All India and Central Services, has strongly criticized recent remarks made by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) against environmental litigants. 

The farmer's burden: How oil, war, and climate are rewriting the price of food

By Vikas Meshram   The scorching flames of the Middle East conflict are now slowly reaching the kitchens of ordinary people. The true price of this war is paid in daily markets, vegetable shops, and in the shattered minds of farmers. Expensive crude oil, skyrocketing fertilizer prices, and rising agricultural costs are together creating the conditions for global food inflation — and this crisis is directly tied to what people eat and drink every day.

Economic nationalism under strain as Indian corporates turn to America

By Sandeep Pandey*  U.S. federal prosecutors withdrew a criminal case involving allegations that Gautam Adani had bribed officials in India to secure solar energy projects, stating that they lacked sufficient evidence. Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar Adani also settled a civil fraud case with the Securities and Exchange Commission by paying a fine of around ₹180 crore without admitting wrongdoing. In addition, Adani Enterprises reportedly deposited around ₹2,750 crore into the U.S. Treasury to resolve allegations that it had violated U.S. sanctions on Iran through purchases of Iranian liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).