Skip to main content

No to free thought? How Gujarat's private universities are cowing down their students

By Rajiv Shah 
"Don't protest"—that's the message private universities across Gujarat seem to be conveying to their students. A senior professor told me that students at the university where he teaches are required to sign an undertaking promising not to engage in protests. "They simply sign the undertaking and hand it over to the university authorities," he said.
Calling the practice "absolutely shocking," the professor, who wished to remain anonymous for fear of repercussions, explained that this policy was introduced after several students protested a few years ago on an issue that could have embarrassed the Government of India. While the professor was unsure about the exact issue, an internet search suggests it might have been related to protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in 2019.
"The Gujarat government took the matter seriously and instructed university authorities to ensure that no such protests occur in the future. Not only were the protesting students made to sign undertakings, but it was also decided that every student admitted to the university must sign one," the professor revealed.
He emphasized that peaceful protests and freedom of expression are fundamental rights of students. He added, "I learned about this policy when students mentioned it to me, almost gleefully. I was shocked. Not a single student at the high-profile university where I teach has protested against signing such an undertaking."
When asked whether other universities had implemented similar policies, the professor said he was certain they must have done so, speculating that a circular may have been issued to this effect. "Protests are a way of fostering critical thinking—something students must learn. Expressing opinions, whether collectively or individually, is an essential part of education," he remarked.
When I asked for a copy of the circular, the professor said that no student seemed to have retained one or even taken a photograph of it. "They probably just signed it and submitted it without question. Unfortunately, there is no trace of resistance to this policy, not even anonymously on social media. The spirit of opposing injustice seems to have been subdued."

Comments

  1. Dr,Suhas Kolhekar,Virologist,Health Activist for Social and Climate Justice.January 16, 2025

    Universities are ment for nurturing the Critical thinking in Students.Asking for signign like this and mindlessly signing No to Protest,is simply disgusting.What else does one expect from Tadipar's and Feku's Gujarat.NIRMA is simply brainwashing the Youth in Gujarat.Friend wake up soon and protect your Future by saying a BIG NO ro such compulsions.You do have a Constitutional right to Freedom of expression and to express your Dissent from what the Authorities want to impose on you.Rise up.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan*  The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

The “Dr” debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta*  India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad   Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.