Skip to main content

Supreme Court procedure 'not followed' in selecting chief of India's RTI watchdog

Anjali Bhardwaj (right) during a protest in defence of RTI
By A Representative
A civil rights organization has protested against the February 18 selection of the chief of the Central Information Commission (CIC) and one information commissioner of CIC, saying, the procedure followed for selecting them go against the directions of the Supreme Court order of February 2019.
On February 18, 2020, the PM-led selection committee reportedly finalised the selection of the chief information commissioner and one information commissioner of the CIC. Bimal Julka, a serving information commissioner, was selected as the chief and Anita Pandove as an information commissioner. Four posts of information commissioners continue to remain vacant.
A statement by right to information (RTI) activists Anjali Bhardwaj and Amrita Johri on behalf of the Satark Nagrik Sangathan, said, "The court in February 2019 had directed that the particulars of applicants, the list of short-listed candidates, the composition of the search and selection committees, and the criteria for shortlisting candidates must be made public."
However, it regretted, "A perusal of the Department of Personnel and Training website shows that information about the particulars of applicants, names of short-listed candidates and the criteria for short-listing are not available publicly. Only the composition of the Search Committee has been put up on the website. This appears to be a violation of the Supreme Court directions."
Further, the statement said, "The names of candidates recommended by the Search Committee were not shared with the leader of opposition, who is a member of the selection panel, prior to the meeting of the selection committee. This raises serious concerns about the robustness of the deliberative process in the appointment of the chief and the information commissioner."
Pointing out that the post of the chief of India's top RTI watchdog is vacant for nearly 40 days, while four other posts of information commissioners are vacant for more than two years (since January 2018), the statement said, "The current backlog of appeals/complaints in the CIC is 34,897", adding, "The selections have been made pursuant to a December 2019 Supreme Court order wherein the Court had directed the Central government to complete the process of appointment of commissioners within 3 months."
A petition related to the non-appointment of information commissioners, filed by Bhardwaj and others, is pending in the Supreme Court since 2018.

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Sachivalaya blacklists, denies entry to woman social activist: Will NHRC probe?

By Kantilal Parmar*  I have approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) seeking an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into a serious incident that took place at the Gujarat Secretariat in Gandhinagar on August 18, 2026. The matter concerns social activist and women’s rights leader Chandrikaben Solanki, who, according to the information available to me, was denied an entry pass to the Secretariat when she went there to meet Gujarat’s Social Justice and Empowerment Minister, Dr. Manishaben Vakil, to raise an issue concerning social justice.

Ample evidence of child labour in South Gujarat's cash rich sugarcane belt: Study

By Rajiv Shah A recent German government-funded study , undertaken jointly by the NGO Prayas Centre for Labour Research and Action and the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, which mainly deals examines the working conditions of migrant workers in the cash-rich sugarcane zone of South Gujarat, has gone a long way to suggest large scale prevalence of child labour during the harvesting season.

Census 2026: Counting citizens or collecting their entire digital identity?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The new census format is out, and rather than accepting the demand for a caste census, the government has introduced a 40-question format for the upcoming census exercise. One wonders how long this exercise will take and whether the officials engaged in it will actually be able to complete it on time.