Skip to main content

Congress decimation in Delhi: It was a 'wicked comment' to blame Sheila Dikshit

By Kamal Mitra Chenoy*
Sheila Dikshit was clearly a colossus, not only in the Congress, but in Delhi as a whole. It is really distressing that Sheila Dikshit’s major role has been sidelined. One did not believe that Sheila Dikshit’s huge contribution, blaming her for the “start of the decline in the Congress party’s fortunes,” would be so nasty.
As a supporter of all secular parties, the All-India Congress Committee (AICC) Delhi in-charge PC Chacko’s attempt to blame Sheila Dikshit, because “any sensible person would have anticipated the defeat of the Congress in Delhi”, is ridiculous.
A wicked comment to blame a deceased colossus is surely unexpected from the Congress. As Pawan Khera, Dikshit’s former aide pointed out, “In 2013, when we lost, Congress vote share in Delhi was 24.55 percent. After a hiatus, in 2019, when she was back in charge, the vote share came up to 22.46 percent.”
Has PC Chacko acknowledged this rise in 2019? Will he have the grace?
It is sad for family and friends that the demise of a major Congress leader should be a profound loss now. This was unfair and horridly timed. Many will mourn her even now. My deep condolences to the bereaved family and friends.
It is sad for family and friends that the demise of a major Congress leader should be a profound loss now. This was unfair and horridly timed
Surely, the Congress should rise to the occasion. Latika Dikshit, daughter of Sheila Dikshit, is right when she says, “I think it speaks volumes about Chacko, and I don’t think it’s worth commenting. She is gone and I am still mourning, it’s a great loss to me personally.” My condolences to Latika Dikshit and Sandeep Dikshit.
I had the privilege of meeting Sheila Dikshit on a number of occasions. She had a warm welcome for many, and many came to her in need. On a couple of occasions, she asked me about my family.
She was amused that, unlike me, my family history was Congress since the 1920s, and ended with with grandmother’s demise in 1957 when she, Hannah Sen, an educationist (founder of the Lady Irwin College) and politician (All-India Women’s Conference, later its President), and a Roving Ambassador for Jawaharlal Nehru, met Ben Gurion in Israel, Mao Tse Tung in China, and others.
Surely, this whole confusion should have been handled with decorum and grace. Many of us will always remember Sheila Dikshit, irrespective of the sudden rush of quibbles. As the great English poet John Keats wrote: “A thing of beauty is a joy forever, its loveliness increases, it will never pass into nothingness.”
---
Former Professor at the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi . Source: Author’s Facebook timeline 

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Reclaiming the self: Feminist consciousness in three poetic traditions

By Ravi Ranjan   Savita Singh’s Main Kiski Aurat Hoon stands today as one of the most intellectually expansive works in contemporary Hindi poetry—a poem that begins with a seemingly simple question of women’s identity but unfolds into a profound meditation on selfhood, history, language, and human freedom. When read alongside Kishwar Naheed’s Hum Gunahgaar Auratein and Adrienne Rich’s Diving into the Wreck , Singh’s poem becomes part of a global feminist conversation that interrogates how identities are constructed, imposed, resisted, and ultimately re‑imagined.