Skip to main content

Work out land use policy in India to "protect" farmers from corporate land transfer: Bhoomi Adhikar Andolan

By A Representative
A two-day national meeting on November 19-20 at the Indian Social Institute, Delhi, with the participation of delegates from 22 states representing over 100 mass organisations has come for forward with the demand for a land use policy from the Government of India in order to “protect” farm land from large scale diversion to non-agricultural purposes like industry and infrastructure.
A statement issued after the meeting, organized under the auspices of the umbrella of Bhoomi Adhikar Andolan (BAA), said such a policy should give “priority to the country’s food and livelihood security, focusing not only on irrigated multiple-crop land but also single-crop land in rainfed areas which form 60% of cultivated area.”
“Gram Sabha and panchayat should have control over the utilization of public lands and have an intrinsic role in development planning”, it said, adding, the government should respect provisions of the Forest Rights Act (FRA) and Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), 1996.
Even as opposing the “dilution” of environmental laws based on the recent recommendations of the TSR Subramanian Committee, there is a need to work out a “a comprehensive strategy to address the shocking levels of agrarian distress in the country today.”
It said, “Over 3.2 lakh farmers have committed suicide since 1995 at the rate of one farmer committing suicide every half an hour. The human tragedy is of a magnitude unheard of in the entire history of humanity.”
Against this backdrop, BAA demanded “income security for every agricultural household through a permanent Farmers’ Income Commission”, adding the minimum support price “should be declared at 50% above cost of cultivation in all 25 crops through procurement, market intervention and price guarantee.”
“The farmers’ seed rights should fully protected instead of handing over seed control to MNCs through intellectual property rights (IPRs) and genetically modified (GM) expansion into crops like brinjal and mustard”, BAA said, adding, “Comprehensive support is essential for shift from high-input chemical agriculture to low-external-input ecologically sustainable and rainfed agriculture.”
BAA, which was formed with the active intervention of the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) during opposition to the now dropped controversial amendments sought by the NDA government to the Land Acquisition Act (LAA), 2013, decided to begin a protected struggle for its demands starting with a rally at Sansad Marg in Delhi on December 15, the forests rights day.
Among those who spoke at the meeting included NAPM’s Medha Patkar, Communist leaders Hannan Mollah and Satyavan, Ulka Mahajan of Sarvahara Jan Andolan, apart from well-known activists Ashok Choudhary, Prafulla Samantara, Dayamani Barla, Alok Shukla, Roma, Anil Chaudhary and others.
In separate resolutions, BAA extended support to the struggle of Karchana peasants against Jaypee Associates in Uttar Pradesh, and demanded release of 42 persons who have jailed; and condemned the Maharashtra government notification allowing easy conversion of agricultural land to industrial purposes, even as  demanding special compensation package to drought affected farmers.

Comments

TRENDING

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan*  The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad   Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.

Vande Mataram and the politics of distraction: When patriotism replaces performance

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   There is an old saying: “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.” Samuel Johnson was not criticising love for one’s country; he was warning against those who weaponise patriotic symbolism to escape accountability. In India today, that warning feels uncomfortably relevant.