Skip to main content

2002... when babus, cops followed Modi's orders

As days pass by, Gujarat's 2002 riots and the alleged role of chief minister Narendra Modi appeared to become even more curious. What began with slain BJP leader Haren Pandya's "anonymous declaration" in front an NGO-sponsored "independent commission" that Modi had "directed" police officials to remain indifferent to the rioting crowd at a meeting on February 27, 2002 has by now become a full-blown legal tangle, being fought in India's top courts.
Despite Pandya's decision to remain anonymous, all knew what he had said and talked about, off the record. About a fortnight before he was mysteriously murdered in 2003, he told me, as he did to others, informally during a dinner at Gymkhana Club in Ahmedabad, that he had indeed made the statement in front of the commission – but on the condition that his name would not be made public. A known Modi rival, Pandya was sidelined for opposing Modi, yet his spirits looked strong.
Statements and counter-statements on the 2002 riots and role of Modi have been made ever since. The latest in the series by IPS officer Sanjeev Bhatt is already in the news. Interesting though it may seem, things have come to such a pass now that Gujarat's top babus, privately, have stopped disagreeing that Modi "may have" made the statement. Talk to them, and even in extreme cases, they are in the "we-have-no-knowledge-of-what-may-have-happened" mode, or just say, "Ask those present at the February 27 meeting."
Even those surrounding Modi do not want to be counted as being in the denial mode. Who knows, where they may be quoted. A top Modi aide, whom I interacted with the other day informally, gave a rather interesting explanation to what may have happened. The effort was clearly to defend Modi, which is his job. But this aide, who has partially looked after the state's home affairs, too, never sought to deny what Modi may have said. He said, the CM then "perhaps lacked political acumen of an administrator", as he had just taken over the reins of power, adding, "He didn't have administrative experience needed to direct officials what to do. He didn't know whom he was dealing with. It was the duty of those who surrounded him to tell the truth."
The aide, who has also been in the midst of some controversy, said, "Modi may perhaps have been driven by the emotion of any Hindu leader in a given situation, when the train burning led to the death of kar sevaks in Godhra. Obviously, he had his constituency in mind – the Hindu voters. But one should ask as to why IPS and IAS officials, who attended the meeting, did not act the way they should have. As serving officials, they are supposed to act firmly when the situation demands them to. They should not be guided by the political thinking of their bosses."
The aide blamed things directly on the type of officials who surrounded Modi then. He described at length the characteristic of each of them. He called then DGP K Chakravarthi "the man acted as if he was never in the field", one who was clearly "incapable" of taking tough decisions. As for the then Ahmedabad police commissioner PC Pande, who has been in the eye of storm for his "indifferent role" in the Gulbarg Society massacre in which ex-Congress MP Ehsan Jaffri was killed, the Modi aide said: "He was too mild. He is known to have never taken any firm decision, either."
Then, this aide turned to IPS officer MK Tandon, who was joint commissioner of police, sector 2, Ahmedabad, during the riots. "I know him since long. He is well-known for evading tough decisions. He would just disappear when he was most needed", the official said, recalling his "personal experiences" from the field. The aide made a similar remark on PB Gondia, the IPS officer, who was accused by riot victims of dereliction of duty, as he was DCP in-charge of Meghaninagar area where the Gulbarg Society is located.
"On top of these officials, we had the chief secretary (G Subba Rao), who always acted in an over-cautious manner, and was afraid of facing difficult situations. How could one expect him to act tough and ask cops to act with a strong arm?", the aide asked, adding, "Then, we had the additional chief secretary, home (Ashok Narayan), who was more busy in analyzing Bhagwad Geeta than looking after the home department. How do you expect him to direct IPS men to go strong? With these types of officials, and crowds running amuck during riots, things were bound to happen as they had."
"What could Modi do, surrounded as he was by such officials?", this aide concluded, adding, "If Modi went wrong, what stopped these officials to act? It was a situation very similar to the 1984 Sikh riots. Rajiv Gandhi was a novice in handling administrative affairs, and the police officials in Delhi went indifferent." The aide insisted, "Not Modi, but these officials are to be blamed. As a politician, Modi is will naturally see his constituency. But as serving officers, how could they act like this?"
---
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/true-lies/suggested-heading-2002-when-babus-cops-followed-modi-s-orders/

Comments

TRENDING

World Hijab Day? Ex-Muslim women observe Feb 1 as No Hijab Day, insist: 'Put it on a Man'

I didn't know that there could ever be a thing as World Hijab Day until I received an email alert from Maryam Namazie of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain (CEMB), stating that several ex-Muslim women's groups had observed the same day—February 1—as No Hijab Day! According to Namazie, the day "was created on February 1 as a direct response to World Hijab Day" to "illuminate the coercive and oppressive realities of the hijab as a pillar of sex apartheid and a war on women."

Google powered AI refuses to correct grammar of a 'balanced' piece on Trump sending chained immigrants to India!

This is a continuation of my blog on how, while the start-up-developed AI app DeepSeek is being criticized for consistently rejecting content related to China or Maoism, there appears to be no mention in Western media about why another app, developed by the powerful Google, Gemini, remains silent on Indian political issues.  

Gujarat a police state? How top High Court advocate stunned a senior-most journalist

Rajdeep Sardesai, Anand Yagnik This is a continuation of my earlier blog on well-known journalist Rajdeep Sardesai's lecture in memory of the late Achyut Yagnik at the Ahmedabad Management Association (AMA). I was a little surprised when I received the intimation about the venue for the lecture.

5% poor in India? Union govt claim debunked, '26.4% of population below poverty line'

A recent paper, referring to the Household Consumption Expenditure Survey (HCES) 2022-23 of the Government of India (GoI), has debunked the official claim that poverty has substantially declined. Titled "Poverty in India: The Rangarajan Method and the 2022–23 Household Consumption Expenditure Survey", the paper —authored by scholars CA Sethu, LT Abhinav Surya, and CA Ruthu—states that "more than a quarter of India’s population falls below the poverty line."

Why predictions of an imminent collapse of the Russian economy may be wrong

A veteran Canadian journalist, settled in Russia, stated in a Facebook post that President Donald Trump "is apparently listening to experts who tell him that Russia's economy is on the verge of 'imploding,' and if he just squeezes a bit harder," his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin "will fall into line."

Talking of increased corporate control over news, Rajdeep Sardesai 'evades' alternative media

When I received an intimation that well-known journalist Rajdeep Sardesai was to speak at the Ahmedabad Management Association (AMA) on February 2, my instant reaction was: I know what he is going to say—his views are quite well known; he wouldn’t be saying anything new. Yet, I decided to go and listen to him to catch his mood at a time when the media, as he (and I) knew it, is changing fast due to the availability of new technological tools that were not accessible even a decade ago.

Why burn Manusmriti? Why not preserve it to demonstrate, display historicity of casteism?

In a significant Facebook post, Rana Singh, former associate professor of English at Patna University, has revealed something that few seem to know. Titled "The Shudras in Manusmriti", Singh says,  because Manusmriti is discussed so often, he thought of reading it himself. “This book likely dates back to the 2nd or 3rd century BCE, and the presence of contradictory statements suggests that it is not the work of a single author,” he says in his Facebook post in Hindi, written in 2022 and recently reshared.

How the middle classes are returning to the BJP fold, be it Delhi or Gujarat: Mahakumbh, Sitharaman's budget

Whatever reasons may be offered for the Aam Aadmi Party's defeat in Delhi—whether it was the BJP's promises of more freebies than AAP, the shedding of ultra-nationalist slogans, or the successful demolition of Arvind Kejriwal's "Mr. Clean" image—my recent interaction with a group of middle-class individuals highlighted a notable trend. Those who had just begun to sit on the fence were now once again returning to the BJP fold.

Gujarat's water anarchy? 16.7% of Narmada water going to industry, 33% of targeted area irrigated: Govt insider

The Narmada project is something that has always excited me, including how much water will be distributed and to which sector. A few days ago, when I was talking to a top Gujarat government insider, I was a little surprised when I was told that it is up to the “respective states to decide how much Narmada water they would distribute among various sectors” out of the total quota allocated to the four states—Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan—as per the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal award of 1979.