Skip to main content

Scholar, bridge-builder and guide: A quiet force for India’s inclusive future

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
This year marks the 40th anniversary of the founding of the Institute of Objective Studies (IOS) in New Delhi, a milestone for any institution. The driving force behind it was Dr Manzoor Alam, who set out to build an organisation capable of bringing together academia, intellectuals, and religious leaders. It was a rare undertaking, particularly for someone who chose to remain in India rather than pursue lucrative opportunities abroad.
Dr Manzoor Alam passed away on January 13, 2026, in Delhi. For those of us who admired him, it is a tremendous loss. He was 80, and many of us hoped he would recover so we could continue conversations and debates that animated his life’s work. But none can alter what nature chooses; he died early that morning, around 5.30.
Dr Alam was extraordinarily polite in conversation, and it was unusual to see him lose his temper with colleagues or adversaries. Critics among liberals sometimes dismissed him as conservative, but he was clear about the needs of his community. Muslims, he insisted, required intellectual and spiritual guidance—but also alliances with Hindus and other communities. He believed the community’s political struggles had to be waged collectively, not in isolation. His outreach was not to secular-liberal circles alone; he invited Hindu faith leaders to share platforms, arguing that mutual respect could be nurtured without abandoning one’s own values or identity. I often disagreed with his approach, but today I realise how strategic and farsighted it was.
My association with Dr Alam began in the early 1990s, introduced by V.T. Rajshekhar. As a young idealist, I found in him a mentor who trusted me, heard me, and encouraged others to listen as well. My first major work, Press and Prejudice: An Insightful Study of Hindi Media, published in 2003 after years of effort beginning in 1998, was made possible through his belief in my ability. That recognition mattered immensely at a time when I was still struggling to be heard.
My second book with IOS, Rise and Role of the Marginalised Communities in India’s Freedom Movement, published in 2018, attempted to reclaim histories neglected by mainstream writing. It gave me immense satisfaction to see passages from it quoted by Dr K Veeramani at a programme honouring me in Chennai.
Dr Alam was equally enthusiastic about my current work on Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, writing a generous introduction. Unfortunately, delays—including his failing health—held up the publication.
In more than three decades in Delhi, I have encountered many intellectuals, activists, and academics. Few combined humility with seriousness of purpose. Dr Alam always respected the work of younger scholars, even when others were hesitant to do so. He insisted that newer voices also deserved space, and ensured they received it.
Despite his achievements, Dr Alam rarely spoke about himself. His biography, written by journalist A.U. Asif and released in October last year, brought together several of his colleagues and admirers. Though visibly unwell, he remained engaged throughout. That turned out to be his final public appearance.
Dr Manzoor Alam’s death is a blow to all who envision an inclusive India—one in which Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists and others coexist in harmony, strengthening rather than weakening one another. Fortunately, IOS remains institutionally strong, supported by colleagues committed to continuing his mission.
His legacy is reflected in the institution’s work: research, publications, and an unmatched record of seminars and conferences. Few organisations have brought together such diverse participants—jurists, political leaders, academics, journalists, activists, and religious figures—on a single platform. His influence was recognised across political lines, from former prime ministers V.P. Singh, H.D. Deve Gowda and I.K. Gujral to Dr Manmohan Singh.
IOS’s publications, ranging across disciplines and themes, are an impressive body of work—often scholarly and rigorous rather than rhetorical. Justice Rajinder Sachar frequently sought Dr Alam’s counsel when chairing the commission that produced the Sachar Report. Justice Sachar, Kuldeep Nayar, and former Chief Justice of India A.M. Ahmadi all valued his contributions. Eminent figures such as Justice V.M. Tarkunde, Rajni Kothari, Iqbal Ansari and Tahir Mehmood participated in IOS initiatives in its early years, helping cement its standing.
Dr Alam’s work extended well beyond IOS. He helped establish and strengthen several organisations, both national and international, and played an important role in the All India Milli Council. His strength lay in connecting scholars, leaders and communities—an increasingly rare ability—and building networks sustained not by power, but by trust.
Perhaps he might have established even more institutions had health and resources allowed, but the foundations he laid remain robust. One hopes IOS will carry forward his vision with conviction and clarity.
My humble tribute to Dr Manzoor Alam. He believed in institutions, in intellectual clarity, and in the idea of a plural, democratic India where citizens live with dignity without surrendering their identities.
A salute to Dr Manzoor Alam and the legacy he leaves behind.
---
*Human rights defender 

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

When tourism meets tribal law: The Vanajangi dispute in Andhra Pradesh

By Palla Trinadha Rao   A writ petition presently before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh has brought into focus an increasingly important question in the governance of tribal regions: can eco-tourism projects in Scheduled Areas be implemented without the consent of the Gram Sabha? The case concerns the establishment of a Community Based Eco-Tourism centre at Vanajangi village in Paderu Mandal of Alluri Sitarama Raju District, a region located within the Scheduled Areas of Andhra Pradesh. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?