2002 riots: Gujarat assembly 'misinformed' about dereliction of duty, says ex-DGP

Former Gujarat topcop RB Sreekumar, an IPS officer of the 1971 batch, has alleged that the Gujarat government gave “totally false information” on the floor of the State Assembly regarding the appeal he made to the Gujarat governor for the “initiation of departmental action against those responsible for culpable negligence in maintenance of public order and investigation of genocidal crimes” during the 2002 riots.
While Sreekumar made his appeal to in 2012, the Gujarat governor sent four reminders to the State home department for the initiation of action, if any, between 2013 and 2015. The State government had informed the house that he received no directions from the governor.
Providing documentary evidence on his appeal and the Gujarat governor’s subsequent reminders on action taken report, Sreekumar, in an email alert to Counterview, said, in an answer to a LAQ (Legislative Assembly Question) by two MLAs (Kantibhai Sodha Parmar and Punambhai Parmar), the State home department supplied “totally false information” on the floor of the Assembly, denying that it had received any direction from the Gujarat governor regarding his representation.
Sreekumar, who was restored his promotion as DGP following his litigation in the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and the Gujarat High Court, added, “It is a clear case of breach of privilege in the Assembly. Can we expect some MLA to take up this breach of privilege issue in the Assembly or otherwise?”
The “genocidal crimes” Sreekumar refers to are regarding the information he provided in the nine affidavits he submitted before the Justice Nanavati Commission which was probing into the protracted communal riots in Gujarat State in 2002 -- four of which when he was in service, and five afterwards.
While the Commission submitted its final report in 2014, giving the Gujarat government under Modi clean chit. The report was made public in December 2019.

In his 12-page representation to the Gujarat governor on December 12, 2012, Sreekumar says, his affidavits had “provided in depth information on the culpable role” of the Gujarat State bureaucracy and police, including the then Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

Among those whom Sreekumar blames in his representation for “dereliction of duty” include two Gujarat chief secretaries, three additional chief secretaries, and two Cabinet ministers, IK Jadeja and Ashok Bhatt (click here for details).

Sreekumar had alleged they were “culpable” in planning and execution of “anti-minority carnage in 2002, manipulation and subversion of the Criminal Justice System in the State to deny and delay justice delivery to riot victim survivors, and illegal acts and misconduct by State Home Department Officials and government pleader to impede the flow of evidence to the Commission.”
On January 1, 2013, the Gujarat governor’s office acknowledged receipt of Sreekumar’s representation, stating that it has been forwarded to the additional chief secretary (ACS), State home department, for “appropriate action.” The governor’s office added, it had also asked the ACS to “report about action taken or proposed to be taken by the government on the issues involved” in the representation.
This was followed by three more reminders to the ACS (home) on action, if any, taken by the State home department, based on the facts provided in Sreekumar’s representation – on May 8, 2014, January 11, 2015, and May 5, 2015.
On July 21, 2021, Sreekumar, in a fresh letter to Gujarat governor Acharya Devvrat, again requested to inform him if “appropriate action” has been taken, as he has been told in a reply to a Right to Information (RTI) plea that that “the information asked for is exempted from releasing to the public vide Home Department resolution No. SB.I/102001/8203/GOI/62 (part file) dated October 25, 2005.”

Comments

Dalit rights and political tensions: Why is Mevani at odds with Congress leadership?

While I have known Jignesh Mevani, one of the dozen-odd Congress MLAs from Gujarat, ever since my Gandhinagar days—when he was a young activist aligned with well-known human rights lawyer Mukul Sinha’s organisation, Jan Sangharsh Manch—he became famous following the July 2016 Una Dalit atrocity, in which seven members of a family were brutally assaulted by self-proclaimed cow vigilantes while skinning a dead cow, a traditional occupation among Dalits.

Powering pollution, heating homes: Why are Delhi residents opposing incineration-based waste management

While going through the 50-odd-page report Burning Waste, Warming Cities? Waste-to-Energy (WTE) Incineration and Urban Heat in Delhi , authored by Chythenyen Devika Kulasekaran of the well-known advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability, I came across a reference to Sukhdev Vihar — a place where I lived for almost a decade before moving to Moscow in 1986 as the foreign correspondent of the daily Patriot and weekly Link .

Boeing 787 under scrutiny again after Ahmedabad crash: Whistleblower warnings resurface

A heart-wrenching tragedy has taken place in Ahmedabad. As widely reported, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner plane crashed shortly after taking off from the city’s airport, currently operated by India’s top tycoon, Gautam Adani. The aircraft was carrying 230 passengers and 12 crew members. As expected, the crash has led to an outpouring of grief across the country. At the same time, there have been demands for the resignation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Amit Shah, and the Civil Aviation Minister.

Ahmedabad's civic chaos: Drainage woes, waterlogging, and the illusion of Olympic dreams

In response to my blog on overflowing gutter lines at several spots in Ahmedabad's Vejalpur, a heavily populated area, a close acquaintance informed me that it's not just the middle-class housing societies that are affected by the nuisance. Preeti Das, who lives in a posh locality in what is fashionably called the SoBo area, tells me, "Things are worse in our society, Applewood."

Global NGO slams India for media clampdown during conflict, downplays Pakistan

A global civil rights group, Civicus has taken strong exception to how critical commentaries during the “recent conflict” with Pakistan were censored in India, with journalists getting “targeted”. I have no quarrel with the Civicus view, as the facts mentioned in it are all true.

Remembering Vijay Rupani: A quiet BJP leader who listened beyond party lines

Late evening on June 12, a senior sociologist of Indian origin, who lives in Vienna, asked me a pointed question: Of the 241 persons who died as a result of the devastating plane crash in Ahmedabad the other day, did I know anyone? I had no hesitation in telling her: former Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani, whom I described to her as "one of the more sensible persons in the BJP leadership."

Whither SCOPE? Twelve years on, Gujarat’s official English remains frozen in time

While writing my previous blog on how and why Narendra Modi went out of his way to promote English when he was Gujarat chief minister — despite opposition from people in the Sangh Parivar — I came across an interesting write-up by Aakar Patel, a well-known name among journalists and civil society circles.

A conman, a demolition man: How 'prominent' scribes are defending Pritish Nandy

How to defend Pritish Nandy? That’s the big question some of his so-called fans seem to ponder, especially amidst sharp criticism of his alleged insensitivity during his journalistic career. One such incident involved the theft and publication of the birth certificate of Masaba Gupta, daughter of actor Neena Gupta, in the Illustrated Weekly of India, which Nandy was editing at the time. He reportedly did this to uncover the identity of Masaba’s father.

Why India’s renewable energy sector struggles under 2,735 compliance hurdles

Recently, during a conversation with an industry representative, I was told how easy it is to set up a startup in Singapore compared to India. This gentleman, who had recently visited Singapore, explained that one of the key reasons Indians living in the Southeast Asian nation prefer establishing startups there is because the government is “extremely supportive” when it comes to obtaining clearances. “They don’t want to shift operations to India due to the large number of bureaucratic hurdles,” he remarked.

Search This Blog