2002 riots: Gujarat assembly 'misinformed' about dereliction of duty, says ex-DGP

By Rajiv Shah
Former Gujarat topcop RB Sreekumar, an IPS officer of the 1971 batch, has alleged that the Gujarat government gave “totally false information” on the floor of the State Assembly regarding the appeal he made to the Gujarat governor for the “initiation of departmental action against those responsible for culpable negligence in maintenance of public order and investigation of genocidal crimes” during the 2002 riots.
While Sreekumar made his appeal to in 2012, the Gujarat governor sent four reminders to the State home department for the initiation of action, if any, between 2013 and 2015. The State government had informed the house that he received no directions from the governor.
Providing documentary evidence on his appeal and the Gujarat governor’s subsequent reminders on action taken report, Sreekumar, in an email alert to Counterview, said, in an answer to a LAQ (Legislative Assembly Question) by two MLAs (Kantibhai Sodha Parmar and Punambhai Parmar), the State home department supplied “totally false information” on the floor of the Assembly, denying that it had received any direction from the Gujarat governor regarding his representation.
Sreekumar, who was restored his promotion as DGP following his litigation in the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and the Gujarat High Court, added, “It is a clear case of breach of privilege in the Assembly. Can we expect some MLA to take up this breach of privilege issue in the Assembly or otherwise?”
The “genocidal crimes” Sreekumar refers to are regarding the information he provided in the nine affidavits he submitted before the Justice Nanavati Commission which was probing into the protracted communal riots in Gujarat State in 2002 -- four of which when he was in service, and five afterwards.
While the Commission submitted its final report in 2014, giving the Gujarat government under Modi clean chit. The report was made public in December 2019.

In his 12-page representation to the Gujarat governor on December 12, 2012, Sreekumar says, his affidavits had “provided in depth information on the culpable role” of the Gujarat State bureaucracy and police, including the then Chief Minister Narendra Modi.

Among those whom Sreekumar blames in his representation for “dereliction of duty” include two Gujarat chief secretaries, three additional chief secretaries, and two Cabinet ministers, IK Jadeja and Ashok Bhatt (click here for details).

In reply to RTI plea on Gujarat governor's directions, Sreekumar was told information sought on 2002 riots is exempted from releasing to public

Sreekumar had alleged they were “culpable” in planning and execution of “anti-minority carnage in 2002, manipulation and subversion of the Criminal Justice System in the State to deny and delay justice delivery to riot victim survivors, and illegal acts and misconduct by State Home Department Officials and government pleader to impede the flow of evidence to the Commission.”
On January 1, 2013, the Gujarat governor’s office acknowledged receipt of Sreekumar’s representation, stating that it has been forwarded to the additional chief secretary (ACS), State home department, for “appropriate action.” The governor’s office added, it had also asked the ACS to “report about action taken or proposed to be taken by the government on the issues involved” in the representation.
This was followed by three more reminders to the ACS (home) on action, if any, taken by the State home department, based on the facts provided in Sreekumar’s representation – on May 8, 2014, January 11, 2015, and May 5, 2015.
On July 21, 2021, Sreekumar, in a fresh letter to Gujarat governor Acharya Devvrat, again requested to inform him if “appropriate action” has been taken, as he has been told in a reply to a Right to Information (RTI) plea that that “the information asked for is exempted from releasing to the public vide Home Department resolution No. SB.I/102001/8203/GOI/62 (part file) dated October 25, 2005.”

Comments

Anonymous said…

the supreme leader and his deputy are well known for their role in gujarat. They are also well known for their role on the floor of the parliament and across India

September 24, 2021

Anonymous said…

Several affidavits have been filed but to what end?

September 26, 2021

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey* Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Covishield controversy: How India ignored a warning voice during the pandemic

Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD * It is a matter of pride for us that a person of Indian origin, presently Director of National Institute of Health, USA, is poised to take over one of the most powerful roles in public health. Professor Jay Bhattacharya, an Indian origin physician and a health economist, from Stanford University, USA, will be assuming the appointment of acting head of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. Bhattacharya would be leading two apex institutions in the field of public health which not only shape American health policies but act as bellwether globally.

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan* “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.

Growth without justice: The politics of wealth and the economics of hunger

By Vikas Meshram* In modern history, few periods have displayed such a grotesque and contradictory picture of wealth as the present. On one side, a handful of individuals accumulate in a single year more wealth than the annual income of entire nations. On the other, nearly every fourth person in the world goes to bed hungry or half-fed.

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.

Conversion laws and national identity: A Jesuit response response to the Hindutva narrative

By Rajiv Shah A recent book, " Luminous Footprints: The Christian Impact on India ", authored by two Jesuit scholars, Dr. Lancy Lobo and Dr. Denzil Fernandes , seeks to counter the current dominant narrative on Indian Christians , which equates evangelisation with conversion, and education, health and the social services provided by Christians as meant to lure -- even force -- vulnerable sections into Christianity.

'Serious violation of international law': US pressure on Mexico to stop oil shipments to Cuba

By Vijay Prashad In January 2026, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba to be an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security—a designation that allows the United States government to use sweeping economic restrictions traditionally reserved for national security adversaries. The US blockade against Cuba began in the 1960s, right after the Cuban Revolution of 1959 but has tightened over the years. Without any mandate from the United Nations Security Council—which permits sanctions under strict conditions—the United States has operated an illegal, unilateral blockade that tries to force countries from around the world to stop doing basic commerce with Cuba. The new restrictions focus on oil. The United States government has threatened tariffs and sanctions on any country that sells or transports oil to Cuba.

Development at what cost? The budget's blind spot for the environment

By Raj Kumar Sinha* The historical ills in the relationship between capital and the environment have now manifested in areas commonly referred to as the "environmental crisis." This includes global warming, the destruction of the ozone layer, the devastation of tropical forests, mass mortality of fish, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, poison seeping into the atmosphere and food, desertification, shrinking water supplies, lack of clean water, and radioactive pollution.

When a lake becomes real estate: The mismanagement of Hyderabad’s waterbodies

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava* Misunderstood, misinterpreted and misguided governance and management of urban lakes in India —illustrated here through Hyderabad —demands urgent attention from Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), the political establishment, the judiciary, the builder–developer lobby, and most importantly, the citizens of Hyderabad. Fundamental misconceptions about urban lakes have shaped policies and practices that systematically misuse, abuse and ultimately erase them—often in the name of urban development.

Search This Blog