PUCL questions legality of Rohingya refugees’ detention and deportation

By A Representative

The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has raised serious concerns over the Indian government’s deportation of 40 Rohingya refugees, alleging the process was illegal, inhumane, and violated both domestic and international laws. In a statement, the organization claims the refugees, registered with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) India, were detained in Delhi and abandoned in international waters near the Myanmar-Thailand border.

On May 6, 2025, 43 Rohingya refugees from Muslim and Christian communities, including children as young as 15, female minors as young as 16, senior citizens up to 66 years old, and individuals with serious illnesses such as cancer, were detained by Delhi Police under the pretext of collecting biometric data. After being held for over 24 hours at various police stations, they were transferred to the Inderlok Detention Center in Delhi. Subsequently, 40 of them were covertly flown to Port Blair in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands aboard an army aircraft. There, they were allegedly blindfolded, bound, and placed on naval ships. Survivors reported being tortured, beaten, and accused of involvement in a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. Women among the group faced sexual harassment and abusive language. The refugees were then abandoned in conflict-ridden waters near Myanmar’s Tanintharyi region, close to Thailand.

A recent report confirms the 40 refugees are now under the protection of Myanmar’s National Unity Government (NUG) in exile, though their exact whereabouts remain undisclosed. Three others remain detained at the Inderlok Detention Center. Additionally, 14 other refugees from two families, detained at Vikaspuri Police Station on May 6, faced illegal detention. While the women were released on May 7, the men were held, relocated on May 8, and reportedly beaten in custody. Some have been released following orders from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dwarka.

PUCL argues the deportation violated India’s obligations under international law, including the UN Convention Against Torture, the 1948 Genocide Convention, and the principle of *non-refoulement*, which prohibits returning individuals to places where they face persecution. The Rohingya, recognized as one of the world’s most persecuted minorities, have faced decades of violence and discrimination in Myanmar, with over a million living as stateless refugees in Bangladesh and others seeking refuge in India, Malaysia, and Thailand. In India, approximately 22,500 Rohingya hold UNHCR Asylum Seeker Certificates, as reported by Refugees International in December 2024.

The organization also claims the actions contravened domestic laws, including constitutional protections under Articles 14 (equality) and 21 (right to life and liberty), as well as the Foreigners Act, which outlines deportation procedures. PUCL criticized the government for ignoring these legal safeguards and noted that the Supreme Court, during a May 8, 2025, hearing on a petition to stop the deportations, declined to intervene, while the government argued that the right to residence under Article 19(1)(e) applies only to citizens. PUCL called this argument misleading, asserting that the Rohingya, as refugees fleeing genocidal violence, are entitled to Article 21 protections available to all persons in India.

PUCL has urged the government to investigate the alleged human rights violations, ensure future deportations adhere to due process, and disclose the whereabouts of detainees for their release to their families. The organization emphasized that India’s actions contradict its historical tradition of offering refuge to persecuted groups, such as the Parsis, and urged adherence to legal and humanitarian standards in the treatment of refugees.

Comments

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

By A Representative A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress.

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava* Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel* The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

From neglect to progress: The story of Ranavara’s community-led development

By Bharat Dogra Visitors to Ranavara, a remote village in Kherwara block of Udaipur district, are often surprised by its multi-dimensional progress. The village today is known for its impressive school building, regenerated pastures, expanded tree cover, and extensive water conservation and supply works. These achievements are the outcome of sustained community efforts over several years, demonstrating how small, consistent initiatives can lead to significant change.

Search This Blog