Skip to main content

PETA India urges Gujarat-wide ban on aggressive foreign dog breeds

By A Representative 
In the wake of a tragic incident where a Rottweiler mauled a four-month-old baby girl to death in Ahmedabad, PETA India has renewed its appeal to the Gujarat government to ban aggressive foreign dog breeds. The animal rights group has written to Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel and Chief Secretary Pankaj Joshi, urging the state to prohibit the breeding, sale, and keeping of dog breeds bred for fighting and aggression.
In its letter, PETA India called for a policy to restrict breeds like pit bull terriers, Rottweilers, Pakistani bully kuttas, Dogo Argentinos, Presa Canarios, Fila Brasileiros, bull terriers, and XL bullies. The organisation warned that these breeds are often acquired by individuals unaware of the challenges in handling them, sometimes resulting in serious attacks.
“These dogs are bred to be unstoppable weapons and are often exploited in illegal dogfighting rings,” said PETA India Advocacy Associate Shaurya Agrawal. “We urge the Gujarat government to enact a policy that protects people from attacks and dogs from cruelty.”
Quoting directly from the letter submitted to the state government, PETA India wrote:
“These dog breeds – including pit bulls and Rottweilers – are bred to be powerful and aggressive and are exploited in gruesome illegal blood sports such as dogfighting. They pose a danger to communities and suffer immensely from abuse, neglect, and mutilations. We urge the government of Gujarat to act swiftly to ban their breeding, sale, and keeping in the interest of public safety and animal welfare.”
PETA India highlighted that, despite laws under The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, illegal dogfights remain rampant in parts of the country. Breeds like pit bulls and Rottweilers are frequently used in these fights, often suffering mutilations like ear cropping and tail docking – practices that are illegal but still common in underground circles.
The group has proposed that the state could impose a ban by mandating sterilisation and registration of existing dogs, alongside a cutoff date after which the breeding, sale, or keeping of such breeds would be prohibited. They also urged strict action against illegal pet shops and breeders, and a crackdown on organised dogfighting.
The Gujarat government has announced plans to frame a policy on this issue.
PETA India maintains that “animals are not ours to abuse in any way” and continues to campaign against speciesism – the belief that one species is superior to another.

Comments

TRENDING

Arrival of USS Lincoln: A ‘leisure trip’ to Thailand or a neo-colonial move to commodify women?

By Benyasiri Eimviriyapong   The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) for a ‘leisure trip’ in Thailand before returning to its campaign of destruction against the people of West Asia demands immediate interrogation and opposition. For us Thai people, and those in sites of American plunder across the globe, this a rattling of the US’ cold war colonial chains on its most loyal lap dog, while conducting a war of aggression in Iran and the ongoing genocide in Palestine. In allowing the USS Lincoln to dock, the Thai ruling elites are once again facilitating a system of imperial violence that extends far beyond Southeast Asian borders, a system which in our case, is predicated on sexual violence and femicide.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine. 

The 'Dr' debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta*  India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.