Skip to main content

Civil society group voices concern over government response to Pahalgam attack

By A Representative 
Citizens for Democracy (CFD), a civil society group, has expressed serious concern over the government's response to the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. While unequivocally condemning the violence, CFD raised alarm about what it sees as an excessive and politically motivated reaction by the authorities.
CFD acknowledged the widespread condemnation of the attack from all sections of society, including strong protests led by local Kashmiri Muslims. However, it criticized the government for failing to provide a transparent account of the security lapses that allowed the attack to occur. It also noted the absence of a clear plan for accountability or a high-level inquiry into the incident.
The group questioned the initiation of Operation Sindoor, describing it as a move driven more by domestic political considerations than strategic necessity. CFD warned that such military actions risk long-term instability and divert attention from peaceful and lawful means of addressing terrorism.
CFD further expressed concern over rising war rhetoric, increased media censorship, and the spread of hate speech in the aftermath of the attack. It criticized the use of national security as a pretext for curbing press freedom and stifling dissenting voices.
In its statement, CFD also pointed to what it called an increasing militarization of the country’s political and economic landscape. It cited growing defense spending, foreign collaborations in arms manufacturing, and the use of religion in political discourse as developments that could undermine democratic institutions and civil liberties.
It said, Pakistan is a diverse and complex country with various factions influencing its political and social landscape. Many Pakistani citizens and businesses express a desire for peace, stability, and trade with India. However, certain elements within Pakistan’s security establishment, including sections of the Army and the ISI, have been associated with supporting non-state armed groups that have conducted attacks in India.
It added, historically, instances of diplomatic progress between India and Pakistan have often been disrupted by terror incidents, which have hindered further negotiations. 
Given this framework, CFD called for an immediate cessation of military operations, a thorough investigation into the Pahalgam attack, and a renewed focus on dialogue, diplomacy, and adherence to democratic norms.

Comments

TRENDING

Arrival of USS Lincoln: A ‘leisure trip’ to Thailand or a neo-colonial move to commodify women?

By Benyasiri Eimviriyapong   The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) for a ‘leisure trip’ in Thailand before returning to its campaign of destruction against the people of West Asia demands immediate interrogation and opposition. For us Thai people, and those in sites of American plunder across the globe, this a rattling of the US’ cold war colonial chains on its most loyal lap dog, while conducting a war of aggression in Iran and the ongoing genocide in Palestine. In allowing the USS Lincoln to dock, the Thai ruling elites are once again facilitating a system of imperial violence that extends far beyond Southeast Asian borders, a system which in our case, is predicated on sexual violence and femicide.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine. 

The 'Dr' debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta*  India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.