Feminist organizations from India and Pakistan call for de-escalation and dialogue

By A Representative

A coalition of over 10 feminist organizations and approximately 1,000 individuals from India and Pakistan have issued a statement calling for immediate de-escalation, diplomatic engagement, and justice in response to the recent rise in hostilities between the two nations.

The statement condemns the terror attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir, which resulted in civilian casualties. It notes that such incidents often exacerbate communal tensions and lead to increased militarization. The signatories also express concern over India's suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty and reciprocal actions from both governments, including visa cancellations that have caused distress, particularly separating families.

Acknowledging a global rise in armed conflict over the past year, the statement warns against growing public desensitization to violence. It calls for a long-term commitment to peace and criticizes rhetoric and symbolic gestures that frame military operations in ways that reinforce gendered narratives.

The signatories urge both governments to maintain open communication, uphold the ceasefire declared on 10 May, and refrain from further escalatory actions. They call for a thorough investigation into the Pahalgam attack, including international representatives, to ensure accountability. Additionally, they request a reconsideration of unilateral policy decisions, such as those affecting water resources and visa access, and emphasize the need for sustained diplomatic efforts to address longstanding political issues, including Kashmir.

Denouncing the naming of India's military operation as "Operation Sindoor" as a deeply patriarchal invocation that exploits female-coded symbols for nationalist ends, the statement stresses that war benefits arms dealers while devastating women, children, and marginalized communities.

The statement has been endorsed by several organizations, including Aurat March (Islamabad and Lahore), Women's Action Forum (various chapters in Pakistan), All India Democratic Women's Association, All India Feminist Association (NAPM), All India Progressive Women's Association, ANHAD, Forum Against Oppression of Women, Saheli Women's Resource Centre, Vimochana Forum for Women's Rights, and Where Are the Womxn (Hyderabad).

Arrival of USS Lincoln: A ‘leisure trip’ to Thailand or a neo-colonial move to commodify women?

By Benyasiri Eimviriyapong The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) for a ‘leisure trip’ in Thailand before returning to its campaign of destruction against the people of West Asia demands immediate interrogation and opposition. For us Thai people, and those in sites of American plunder across the globe, this a rattling of the US’ cold war colonial chains on its most loyal lap dog, while conducting a war of aggression in Iran and the ongoing genocide in Palestine. In allowing the USS Lincoln to dock, the Thai ruling elites are once again facilitating a system of imperial violence that extends far beyond Southeast Asian borders, a system which in our case, is predicated on sexual violence and femicide.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha* In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine.

The 'Dr' debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta* India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

Counterview

Search This Blog