Skip to main content

Revered as Our Shining Black Prince, Malcolm X's spirit resonates among the oppressed masses

By Harsh Thakor* 
On May 19, the world commemorated the centenary of Malcolm X, who remains a towering figure among the 20th-century revolutionaries that fought to dismantle systems of repression and degradation. His contributions to the struggle against racist oppression, his advocacy for the right to self-defense, and his unwavering demand for self-determination for the Black diaspora have left an indelible mark on the history of liberation movements.
Malcolm X continues to symbolize revolutionary resistance and militant struggle by the exploited and oppressed. Revered as “Our Shining Black Prince,” el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz—Malcolm X—embodied the justified rage and rebellious spirit of the Black Nation. Even 100 years after his birth, his ideas continue to light the path to freedom. Because he advocated revolution and armed self-defense, he has often been obscured and vilified in dominant narratives.
A brilliant and penetrating thinker, Malcolm was relentless in his pursuit of knowledge and constantly evolving in his ideas. In the ongoing fight against racism, colonialism, and capitalism, his positions remain more relevant than ever. A self-taught intellectual from a working-class background, he envisioned a world where the exploited and oppressed could govern their own lives and reclaim what was denied to them because of class and race. As an organizer, Malcolm was exceptional—creating networks and institutions, both religious and secular, across the U.S., and forging strong bonds between the Black Liberation Movement and national liberation movements across the world.
Born Malcolm Little on May 19, 1925, he grew up amid Jim Crow segregation and Ku Klux Klan terror. His parents were taken from him during childhood, and his siblings were separated. He left school after the eighth grade when a white teacher crushed his aspirations to become a lawyer using deeply racist language.
Malcolm X was deeply shaped by Garveyism, raised within the United Negro Improvement Association (UNIA)—the largest Black organization in the Americas. His father, a UNIA leader, was murdered by a collusion of police and KKK-style vigilantes. As a young man, Malcolm worked various jobs but also turned to crime, eventually serving over six years in prison. There, he educated himself and joined the Nation of Islam (NOI), adopting the name Malcolm X. Upon release, he quickly rose through the ranks, organized against police brutality, and dramatically expanded NOI’s membership. His growing influence brought him under FBI surveillance.
Malcolm was inspired by Paul Robeson and followed his life closely while in prison. It is no surprise that he found alignment with Elijah Muhammad’s Nation of Islam. Like the UNIA, the NOI championed Black dignity and solidarity with anti-colonial movements worldwide. The NOI’s vision of a separate Black nation aligned with the “Black Belt Thesis” once advanced by the Communist Party and Black communist Harry Haywood.
Though initially a proponent of Black nationalism, Malcolm’s philosophy evolved. He ultimately rejected the NOI’s vision of separatism, criticizing its calls for a “Black state” and advocating instead for a society based on equality for all. After breaking from the NOI, he abandoned the term “Black nationalism,” recognizing its limitations and denouncing the NOI’s capitalist leanings.
Malcolm X served as a catalyst for many liberation movements, including the Black Panther Party, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), the Black Liberation Army, the Young Lords, and the Republic of New Afrika. Although assassinated 60 years ago, his phrase “by any means necessary” continues to echo in struggles across the globe. His transition from Islamic separatism to Marxist internationalism marked a key shift in his political life.
Internationalism was central to Malcolm’s vision. As minister of Harlem’s NOI mosque, he regularly engaged with African diplomats and liberation leaders, often inviting them to speak to Harlem audiences. He welcomed figures like Kwame Nkrumah and Fidel Castro, and met with leaders including Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser, Guinea’s Sekou Touré, and Zambia’s Kenneth Kaunda. He also met Patrice Lumumba and Algeria’s Ahmed Ben Bella.
After leaving the NOI, Malcolm deepened his efforts to forge global alliances. He toured Africa and visited Gaza, meeting with leaders of the Palestinian Liberation Organization. His efforts to link the Black Liberation struggle with anti-colonial and anti-imperialist movements alarmed the U.S. government. In 1964, the State Department contacted the CIA to investigate his circle, while the FBI, in coordination with President Lyndon B. Johnson, monitored him closely.
Malcolm studied post–World War II revolutions and recognized the shifting world order. He witnessed anti-colonial uprisings in China, Algeria, Vietnam, and Cuba, the assassination of Patrice Lumumba, and the Bandung Conference of 1955—all of which reshaped his worldview. He came to understand the interconnectedness of global struggles and the rise of U.S. imperialism as the dominant capitalist force. His views increasingly emphasized internationalism and class unity.
In a lesser-known visit to Gaza in September 1964, Malcolm toured the Khan Younis refugee camp and later wrote “Zionist Logic,” in which he likened Zionism to a new form of colonialism threatening both Palestine and newly liberated African states. This was an early gesture of solidarity with the Palestinian people against the U.S.-backed Israeli regime.
Malcolm saw the United Nations as a venue to raise the plight of oppressed Black Americans and envisioned a global united front against imperialism. He admired Mao Zedong and the Chinese Revolution. He noted that Mao welcomed his comrade Robert F. Williams—who had armed himself in defense against white supremacists in North Carolina—and issued statements supporting Black struggle in the U.S. Malcolm saw China as a model of revolutionary transformation and praised its eradication of “Uncle Toms.”
Malcolm was also a fierce critic of capitalism. He argued, “It is impossible for capitalism to survive, primarily because the system needs some blood to suck... it can only suck the blood of the helpless.” He warned that as formerly colonized nations gained independence, capitalism would weaken and ultimately collapse. In one forum, when someone stated that the real enemy of justice and equality was capitalism, Malcolm called it “the most intelligent answer I’ve ever heard on that question.”
His support for armed self-defense offered a vital counterpoint to the Civil Rights Movement’s nonviolent approach. Malcolm’s recognition of the systemic violence inflicted on Black communities laid the groundwork for groups like the Black Panther Party and Black Power activists.
Despite his deep internationalist vision, Malcolm was overly optimistic about the support that post-colonial states might provide to other oppressed peoples. In reality, few states have fulfilled this role consistently—perhaps with the partial exception of Gaddafi’s Libya, which had its own contradictions. It is also worth questioning how Malcolm’s speech at Oxford was facilitated by BBC-aligned Eric Abraham, who later supported U.S. military intervention in Grenada.
Though Malcolm advocated African-Asian unity, such coalitions were thwarted by colonial-state opposition and internal contradictions.
In the final months of his life, Malcolm was negotiating with SNCC, speaking in Alabama, and hosting activists like Fannie Lou Hamer in Harlem. He was scheduled to speak in Jackson, Mississippi at an SNCC event just days after his assassination. His outlook had shifted decisively toward anti-imperialist internationalism. Despite ideological differences, he sought unity with Civil Rights leaders like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., proposing joint efforts to bring human rights violations before the UN. Dr. King was, by then, reciprocating this outreach.
Until his death, Malcolm worked to build connections with forces both in the U.S. and globally to combat racism, colonialism, imperialism, and capitalism. He emphasized forming lasting organizations and infrastructure to challenge these systems. He also exposed the hypocrisy of liberalism under President Johnson—highlighting U.S. aggression in Vietnam, the role of the two-party system in diffusing social movements, and the entrenchment of white supremacy. He condemned American democracy for its complicity in violence, including the murders of civil rights workers like James Earl Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner in 1964.
Just a month before his assassination—believed to have been orchestrated by the U.S. government—Malcolm declared, “It is incorrect to classify the revolt of the Negro as simply a racial conflict of Black against white or as a purely American problem. Rather, we are today seeing a global rebellion of the oppressed against the oppressor, the exploited against the exploiter.”
---
*Freelance journalist 

Comments

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

What's behind Donald Trump's 'narco-state' accusation against Venezuela

By Manolo De Los Santos  The US government has revived its campaign to label Venezuela a "narco-state", accusing its top leadership of drug trafficking and slapping hefty bounties on their heads for capture. This campaign, which only momentarily took a backseat, is a strategic fabrication, not a factual assessment. This accusation, particularly amplified under the Trump Administration, is a calculated smokescreen to justify a long-standing agenda: the overthrow of the Venezuelan government and the seizure of its vast oil and mineral resources. A closer examination of the facts reveals a country that has actively fought drug trafficking on its own terms and a US government with a clear and consistent history of destabilizing independent countries in Latin America.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857  By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman*  Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”