Complaint filed against Amul for alleged violation of IMS Act in infant formula promotion

By A Representative

The Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI) has filed a formal complaint against dairy giant Amul, alleging violations of the Infant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles, and Infant Foods (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1992 (IMS Act). The complaint has been addressed to the Ministry of Women and Child Development, the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), the Food Safety Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), and the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

Dr. Arun Gupta, Chief Coordinator of BPNI, has raised concerns regarding Amul’s recent launch of its liquid ready-to-feed infant formula, branded as Amulspray. BPNI argues that this constitutes a direct violation of the IMS Act, which prohibits the promotion of infant milk substitutes. The organization cites Section 2(g) and Section 2(i) of the Act, which define infant milk substitutes and restrict promotional activities. Reports from media outlets such as The Tribune and Agrimoon.com indicate that Amul’s press release emphasized the product’s convenience for working mothers and its nutritional benefits, which BPNI claims amounts to unlawful marketing.

Further concerns have been raised regarding Amul’s use of a teddy bear graphic on the product packaging. BPNI asserts that this violates Section 6(2) of the IMS Act, which prohibits the use of imagery designed to enhance product saleability. In response, the organization has urged authorities to take action, including directing Amul to cease all promotional activities related to infant milk substitutes, removing the teddy bear graphic from the product label, establishing a monitoring mechanism to ensure compliance with the IMS Act, and issuing advisories to media outlets to vet press releases for legal compliance before publication.

BPNI, which has been actively monitoring compliance with the IMS Act since its notification by the Government of India in 1994, claims to remain committed to safeguarding infant feeding practices from commercial influence. As the complaint gains attention, stakeholders await the response from government agencies regarding potential regulatory action against Amul.

Arrival of USS Lincoln: A ‘leisure trip’ to Thailand or a neo-colonial move to commodify women?

By Benyasiri Eimviriyapong The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) for a ‘leisure trip’ in Thailand before returning to its campaign of destruction against the people of West Asia demands immediate interrogation and opposition. For us Thai people, and those in sites of American plunder across the globe, this a rattling of the US’ cold war colonial chains on its most loyal lap dog, while conducting a war of aggression in Iran and the ongoing genocide in Palestine. In allowing the USS Lincoln to dock, the Thai ruling elites are once again facilitating a system of imperial violence that extends far beyond Southeast Asian borders, a system which in our case, is predicated on sexual violence and femicide.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha* In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine.

The 'Dr' debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta* India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

Counterview

Search This Blog