Counterinsurgency? PUCL seeks transparent, independent judicial inquiry into Maoists' 'extrajudicial killings'

By A Representative

The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has strongly condemned what it described as the extrajudicial killing of Nambala Keshava Rao, General Secretary of the banned CPI (Maoist), and 26 others in a reported encounter by security forces in Narayanpur district, Chhattisgarh. PUCL stated that many of the deceased were Adivasi residents and accused the state of bypassing due process under the guise of counterinsurgency.

The operation, which resulted in the death of one District Reserve Guard (DRG) personnel and injuries to several others, was praised by the Union Home Minister on social media as a "landmark achievement" in the fight against Naxalism. PUCL, however, asserted that no individual, regardless of ideology, is beyond the protection of the law and denounced the incident as a violation of the right to life and due process.

Citing guidelines issued by the National Human Rights Commission and upheld by the Supreme Court in the PUCL v. State of Maharashtra case (2014), the organisation reiterated that every police encounter death must be treated as a cognizable offence, with mandatory FIR registration and a magisterial inquiry.

PUCL expressed grave concern over what it described as a pattern of indiscriminate killings under Operation Kagar and its offshoots, claiming over 430 people have been killed in Bastar since January 2024, including civilians and alleged Maoists. The group further criticised the reported cremation of bodies without handing them over to families, despite court orders and the families’ persistent demands.

Quoting from the Supreme Court’s ruling in DK Basu v. State of West Bengal, PUCL highlighted that the right to life includes dignified treatment of the dead and timely release of bodies to family members. The organisation warned that the actions of the state may amount to a grave breach of international humanitarian law under Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions if the victims were unarmed or in custody.

PUCL accused the government of ignoring peace initiatives, including a unilateral ceasefire proposal from CPI (Maoist), and raised questions over its commitment to constitutional values. It warned that continued impunity threatens the moral legitimacy of the state.

The organisation called for a transparent, independent judicial inquiry into the killings, accountability of officials involved, the immediate return of remaining bodies to families, and a halt to ongoing military operations in the region.

Arrival of USS Lincoln: A ‘leisure trip’ to Thailand or a neo-colonial move to commodify women?

By Benyasiri Eimviriyapong The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) for a ‘leisure trip’ in Thailand before returning to its campaign of destruction against the people of West Asia demands immediate interrogation and opposition. For us Thai people, and those in sites of American plunder across the globe, this a rattling of the US’ cold war colonial chains on its most loyal lap dog, while conducting a war of aggression in Iran and the ongoing genocide in Palestine. In allowing the USS Lincoln to dock, the Thai ruling elites are once again facilitating a system of imperial violence that extends far beyond Southeast Asian borders, a system which in our case, is predicated on sexual violence and femicide.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha* In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine.

The 'Dr' debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta* India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

Counterview

Search This Blog