Skip to main content

PharmEasy: The only online medical store which revises prices upwards after confirming the order

By Rajiv Shah 
For senior citizens — especially those without a family support system — ordering medicines online can be a great relief. Shruti and I have been doing this for the last couple of years, and with considerable success. We upload a prescription, receive a verification call from a doctor, and within two or three days, the medicines are delivered to our doorstep.
Given the stiff competition among online pharmacies, many of them offer rebates. Some even suggest switching to generic alternatives after we place the order. We sometimes agree, but we always make it clear that we won’t change brands for important medicines without consulting our doctor.
However, with competition has come unethical price manipulation.
In our experience, PharmEasy stands out as the worst offender. They initially attract you with a 27% discount. But after finalizing the cart, it drops to 24%. Even then, we’ve placed orders (we prefer cash on delivery). But after getting a confirmation, and just before dispatching the shipment, they increase the price of the medicines.
This happened to us in late April. We had ordered medicines worth over ₹5,000. While enjoying dosa at our favourite Chennai Express restaurant in Ahmedabad, I received an SMS informing me that the prices had been revised upward. Shocked, I canceled the order and left this review on the PharmEasy app:
> “After I ordered medicines at a certain price, PharmEasy hours later updated and revised the prices upward. Unethical — decided to cancel the order.”
They responded, asking us to email the order number. To our surprise, not only was the order canceled, but PharmEasy also removed the entire order history from our account! Still, on May 1, we emailed them with our phone number to find out if it had been an error.
Since then, we’ve received two responses. One, from Sandhya Nackwal on May 2, explained the revised pricing:
> “The products listed in the app are not linked to a fixed price. Thus, we share the estimated cost at the time of order placement, which can be either higher or lower than the actual price. We send you an SMS or push notification for the total discounted amount once your medicines are procured...”
The reply urged us to be patient and reorder. It added:
> “Sometimes, the MRP of medicines may vary depending on the stock received by the chemist. This variation is always due to manufacturer price changes. However, if the price on the packaging differs from the bill, please share an image highlighting the batch number so we can resolve the issue.”
Later, we received a phone call assuring us that this wouldn’t happen again and urging us to reorder. So we did, on May 3. I also sent another email on May 6:
> “Yours is the only platform that updates the price upwards after the order is placed and billed. Very strange, to say the least. We had to cancel the order twice, and now your representative tells us it won’t happen again, so he revived the cancelled order at the original price. Let’s see what happens now!”
But again, the prices were revised upward. After canceling the second order, we got another phone call with the same assurance. So we placed a third order — tempted by the best rebate.
This time, the total payable amount had gone down. Suspicious, I checked and realized they had simply reduced the quantity of medicines we had ordered while raising the prices of the rest. We canceled again and left this updated review:
> “Am forced to edit my review. Twice, after I ordered medicines, PharmEasy revised prices upward before delivery. Third time, they reduced the total amount but also reduced the number of medicines, while increasing some prices. Unethical, untrustworthy. Have canceled for the third time...”
It’s now been two weeks, and we keep getting calls from PharmEasy representatives. We hang up the moment we realize it’s them.
Out of curiosity, I browsed the app’s review section. To my dismay — but not surprise — many others have faced the same issue.
Prashant Arya (April 23):
> “I recently purchased a pharmaceutical product from this platform, and unfortunately, my experience was disappointing. The listed price was ₹80, but the final bill showed ₹100. Plus, additional platform fees made the overall cost even higher. The advertised price does not reflect the actual cost at checkout. Misleading and frustrating.”
M Mohan (January 18):
> “Prices changed between adding items to the cart and checkout. Discounts were shown initially but vanished later. Customer support was poor and unhelpful.”
Namrata Behera (April 30):
> “Most products are listed at a fair price, but at checkout, the price increases…”
Vedant Mule (May 12):
> “Don’t use this app. There’s a huge difference in the price shown on the product page and the cart…"
Each of these users gave a one-star rating. I don’t know whether PharmEasy is losing customers. Maybe not — they claim to have over four crore “satisfied” customers. Perhaps that’s why they don’t care about negative reviews.
But I still wonder: has PharmEasy ever tried to find out why no other app makes such bizarre upward price revisions after confirming an order?

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

From neglect to progress: The story of Ranavara’s community-led development

By Bharat Dogra   Visitors to Ranavara, a remote village in Kherwara block of Udaipur district, are often surprised by its multi-dimensional progress. The village today is known for its impressive school building, regenerated pastures, expanded tree cover, and extensive water conservation and supply works. These achievements are the outcome of sustained community efforts over several years, demonstrating how small, consistent initiatives can lead to significant change.