Skip to main content

Diaspora groups urge India to drop charges against Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad

By A Representative 
Two U.S.-based diaspora advocacy groups, the Indian American Muslim Council and Hindus for Human Rights, have issued a joint statement urging the Indian government to immediately drop all charges against Professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad. They also called for the release of all political prisoners and prisoners of conscience detained for exercising their democratic rights.
Professor Mahmudabad was arrested on May 18 following a complaint by a leader affiliated with the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The complaint targeted a social media post in which the professor voiced concern over civilian casualties in the wake of Operation Sindoor, India’s recent military strikes on targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. In the post, he also criticized perceived double standards in the treatment of Indian Muslims.
Though the Supreme Court granted him interim bail on May 21, it reportedly described his post as “dog whistling” and an attempt at “cheap publicity,” language the advocacy groups argue legitimizes police harassment and legal persecution.
The statement contextualized the arrest as part of a broader crackdown on dissent in India, citing recent actions by Indian authorities to block over 8,000 social media accounts and restrict access to several independent media platforms, including The Wire, Maktoob Media, and various Kashmiri outlets. Some of these platforms were only partially restored later.
According to the groups, these developments reflect a wider pattern of repression targeting academics, journalists, and Muslim intellectuals. The statement also referenced the continued detention of student activists such as Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).
Calling for an end to what they describe as authoritarian practices, the diaspora organizations urged the Indian government to uphold constitutional rights and protect free expression for all citizens, regardless of religious identity.

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Arrival of USS Lincoln: A ‘leisure trip’ to Thailand or a neo-colonial move to commodify women?

By Benyasiri Eimviriyapong   The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) for a ‘leisure trip’ in Thailand before returning to its campaign of destruction against the people of West Asia demands immediate interrogation and opposition. For us Thai people, and those in sites of American plunder across the globe, this a rattling of the US’ cold war colonial chains on its most loyal lap dog, while conducting a war of aggression in Iran and the ongoing genocide in Palestine. In allowing the USS Lincoln to dock, the Thai ruling elites are once again facilitating a system of imperial violence that extends far beyond Southeast Asian borders, a system which in our case, is predicated on sexual violence and femicide.
2 comments
»

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine. 
Post a Comment
»

The 'Dr' debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta*  India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.
3 comments
»