Skip to main content

AISEC calls for rollback of privatization, communalization in Indian education system

By A Representative 
On the birth anniversary of social reformer Raja Rammohan Roy, the All India Save Education Committee (AISEC) unveiled the Draft People’s Education Policy 2025 (PEP 2025), presenting it as a comprehensive and democratic alternative to the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. Framed after extensive consultations with educators, students, parents, and civil society groups, the draft aims to revive the vision of India’s freedom fighters for an education system that is truly universal, secular, scientific, democratic, and inclusive.
The release of the draft policy comes after years of nationwide opposition to NEP 2020, which AISEC criticizes as a centralized and top-down imposition that bypassed parliamentary debate and ignored the voices of key stakeholders. AISEC points out that the NEP was finalized during the COVID-19 lockdown and was never placed before Parliament, despite education being a subject on the Concurrent List requiring both central and state collaboration.
According to AISEC, NEP 2020 undermines the constitutional promise of equality in education by promoting privatization, commercialization, and online models of learning that exclude large sections of the population. It notes that the NEP's vision is heavily skewed toward central control and market-oriented goals, and it dangerously opens the door to religious and ideological indoctrination under the guise of “decolonizing” Indian education.
In contrast, the People’s Education Policy 2025 is rooted in the values of social justice, pluralism, and federalism. The document traces the historical evolution of education in India—from its exclusionary nature in ancient and medieval times to the role played by modern social reformers and freedom fighters in advocating for mass education. The policy acknowledges past efforts post-independence to universalize education but highlights persistent disparities in access, quality, and infrastructure, especially for rural, marginalized, and economically disadvantaged communities.
PEP 2025 outlines a vision for a robust public education system that is fully state-funded and democratically governed. It opposes the NEP’s 5+3+3+4 structural shift and instead reaffirms the 10+2 framework, integrating pre-primary, primary, and middle schooling into a cohesive system. The draft calls for free and compulsory education up to Class 12, with state responsibility for funding infrastructure, hiring qualified teachers, and ensuring uniform standards across rural and urban areas.
The draft policy pays detailed attention to addressing educational disparities. It proposes specific strategies for improving access and quality in rural schools, increasing girls’ enrollment through gender-sensitive curriculum reforms, ensuring educational support for socially disadvantaged groups like Scheduled Castes and Tribes, and expanding facilities for children with physical and mental disabilities. It also recognizes the challenges faced by children of migrant workers, street children, and others on the social margins, demanding inclusive measures to integrate them into mainstream education.
The People’s Education Policy places strong emphasis on keeping school curricula secular, scientific, and rational. It argues for eliminating content that reinforces caste, gender, and religious stereotypes and calls for a curriculum that fosters critical thinking, mutual respect, and constitutional values. It opposes any interference by political authorities in syllabus-making and urges that curriculum decisions be left to independent academic bodies composed of educators and experts.
At the higher education level, PEP 2025 strongly opposes centralized entrance tests like CUET and NEET, advocating instead for admissions based on local and institutional processes. It criticizes the NEP's “entry and exit” system for degrees as disruptive and misleading, and calls for stable three-year and four-year structures based on disciplinary requirements. The policy also raises concerns over the unchecked growth of private universities and insists that the government must not allow self-financing models in public institutions.
In the domain of research, the draft insists on academic freedom, ethical standards, and adequate public funding. It supports the reinstatement of M.Phil programmes and demands stipends and fellowships for all research scholars, while rejecting government interference in topic selection or research direction.
On professional education, including engineering, medicine, law, and agriculture, the draft policy calls for periodic curriculum updates, government funding, and a scientific approach. It rejects practices such as capitation fees and management/NRI quotas in professional institutions and emphasizes that all professional courses must also include humanities subjects to nurture socially conscious graduates.
AISEC has called for wide-ranging discussions on the draft across the country. “This is only a draft,” said a representative of the Committee, “and we will continue to hold consultations with all stakeholders before finalizing the policy. Our aim is to present a truly people-centric education framework, one that fulfills the constitutional promise and the dreams of India’s freedom fighters.”
The final version of the People’s Education Policy 2025, once revised based on public feedback, will be placed before a National People’s Parliament and then submitted to the central and state governments with a demand for its implementation.
In a climate of growing concern over the direction of India's education system, the release of this draft signals a determined pushback from civil society. It seeks to reclaim education as a public good, a tool of empowerment, and a cornerstone of a democratic and egalitarian society.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Happy to know about the release of People’s Education Policy. It seems to reflect the views of common man.

TRENDING

Telangana government urged to stop 'unconstitutional' relocation of Chenchu tribes

By A Representative   The Nallamalla forests are witnessing a renewed surge of indigenous resistance as the Chenchu adivasis , a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG), have formally launched the Chenchu Solidarity Forum (CSF) on the eve of World Earth Day to combat what they describe as unlawful and forced relocation from the Amrabad Tiger Reserve . 

Kolkata dialogue flags policy and finance deficit in wetland sustainability

By A Representative   Wetlands were the focus of India–Germany climate talks in Kolkata, where experts from government, business, and civil society stressed both their ecological importance and the urgent need for stronger conservation frameworks. 

'Fraudulent': Ex-civil servants urge President to halt Odisha tribal land dispossession

By A Representative   A collective of 81 retired civil servants from the Constitutional Conduct Group has written to the President of India expressing alarm over what they describe as the wrongful dispossession of tribal lands in Odisha’s Rayagada district. The letter, dated April 19, 2026, highlights violent clashes in Kantamal village where police personnel reportedly injured over 70 tribal residents attempting to protect their community rights. 

Dhandhuka violence: Gujarat minority group seeks judicial action, cites targeted arson

By A Representative   The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC) Gujarat has written to the Director General of Police seeking judicial action in connection with recent violence in Dhandhuka town of Ahmedabad district, alleging targeted attacks on properties belonging to members of the Muslim community following a fatal altercation between two bike riders on April 18.

Cracks in Gujarat model? Surat’s exodus reveals precarity behind prosperity claims

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*   The return of migrant workers from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, particularly from Gujarat, was inevitable. Gujarat has long been showcased as the epitome of “infrastructure” and the business-friendly Modi model. Yet, when governments become business-friendly, they require the poor to serve them—while keeping them precarious, unable to stabilize, demand fair wages, or assert their rights. The agenda is clear: workers must remain grateful for whatever crumbs the Seth ji offers.  

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

The high price of unemployment: The human cost of the drug crisis in J&K

​By Raqif Makhdoomi*  ​ Jammu and Kashmir is no longer merely at risk of a drug epidemic ; it is losing the fight. The statistics are staggering, with approximately 13.5 lakh people—nearly 8% of the total population—caught in the grip of substance abuse . In the ranking of Indian Union Territories , Jammu and Kashmir now sits at a grim top. We have officially reached a point where we can no longer speak in hypotheticals about a future crisis. The vocabulary has shifted from "if" to "if not addressed immediately."

India 'violating international law obligations' over Israel ties: UN rapporteur

By A Representative   Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, has alleged that India is “violating its obligations under international law” through its continued association with Israel, including defence ties and alleged arms exports during the ongoing conflict in Gaza.

Population as destiny: The dangerous logic of India's new delimitation move

By Jag Jivan   Dr. Narasimha Reddy Donthi , a noted public policy expert and public interest campaigner, in a detailed critical analysis of two Bills introduced in Parliament in April 2026—the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026 and the Delimitation Bill, 2026 , has warned that the twin bills "raise significant constitutional, political and methodological concerns — most critically, a structural inconsistency in the census basis used for Parliament versus State Assemblies, and an over-reliance on population as the sole parameter for delimitation."