Skip to main content

Farmers' discontent over land pooling for urban estates highlights need for new policy

By Bharat Dogra 
Recent reports from various parts of Punjab, including Ludhiana, Jalandhar, Phagwara, and Hoshiarpur, indicate growing farmer mobilization against the state government's land-pooling policy for urban estate development. This opposition isn't isolated; similar sentiments are surfacing across the country. Furthermore, indiscriminate and profit-driven urbanization has led to widespread ecological damage, including blocked natural drainage and destructive floods.
This article proposes an alternative: a highly democratic, transparent, and participatory approach to urbanization that can prevent such discontent and environmental degradation.
A Participatory Approach to Urbanization
Village panchayats, or elected village councils, can initiate a consultative process to identify farmers willing to sell land for urbanization within a specified price range. This ensures that only voluntary sales occur, leaving unwilling farmers undisturbed. Subsequently, through similar consultative methods and collaborative dialogue, the community can creatively decide how to best utilize the available land, even if it's spread across multiple locations. This approach encourages the development of several smaller, more aesthetically pleasing housing clusters rather than a single, large skyscraper complex.
To illustrate, consider a village with 200 households, 100 of which are farming families with an average of 5 acres each, totaling 500 acres of farmland. If, say, 50 acres are voluntarily offered for urban-style housing and related development, 450 acres would remain for farming, thus preserving the village's essential rural and green character.
Economic and Community Benefits
Suppose this 50-acre parcel is used to provide quality urban housing for approximately 200 outsider households, each with an average budget of INR 5 million for a house, totaling INR 1000 million. The panchayat could then allocate about 20% of this to land sellers, 60% to house construction, and roughly 20% (around INR 200 million) to community development projects. These projects could include water conservation, building paths and roads, installing renewable energy sources, tree planting, creating biodiversity parks, and implementing skill development programs for villagers, with a special focus on landless households. This is in addition to the panchayat's regular development budgets, which should continue to be used judiciously.
The arrival of 200 additional families would create numerous new livelihood opportunities and a guaranteed market for daily farm produce like vegetables, fruits, and milk. Farmers could adopt natural farming practices, reducing costs and providing healthy food that new settlers would likely purchase at a premium. The new residents' contacts could also help find new customers in nearby cities.
House buyers could make payments over a period of about three years during the construction phase. While panchayats can engage external professional help, including government agencies, for construction, they should prioritize employing local people. The entire process must be highly transparent, with social auditing complementing regular checks and balances.
By allowing villagers to participate in selecting housing sites, it can be ensured that developments align with local needs, such as not obstructing water drainage.
This approach fosters urbanization that coexists peacefully with villages, rather than disrupting rural life. Instead, it contributes to the creation of better, more integrated villages.
---
The writer is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include Saving Earth for Children, A Day in 2071, Navjeevan, and Planet in Peril

Comments

TRENDING

Arrival of USS Lincoln: A ‘leisure trip’ to Thailand or a neo-colonial move to commodify women?

By Benyasiri Eimviriyapong   The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) for a ‘leisure trip’ in Thailand before returning to its campaign of destruction against the people of West Asia demands immediate interrogation and opposition. For us Thai people, and those in sites of American plunder across the globe, this a rattling of the US’ cold war colonial chains on its most loyal lap dog, while conducting a war of aggression in Iran and the ongoing genocide in Palestine. In allowing the USS Lincoln to dock, the Thai ruling elites are once again facilitating a system of imperial violence that extends far beyond Southeast Asian borders, a system which in our case, is predicated on sexual violence and femicide.

Global financial institutions 'ignored' climate warnings in Nepal’s hydropower disaster: SANDRP probe

Counterview News  A catastrophic flood disaster across Nepal’s Himalayan river valleys has triggered urgent international scrutiny over the role of multilateral lenders and development finance institutions. According to an extensive investigation published by the South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People (SANDRP), international financiers—including the World Bank Group’s International Finance Corporation (IFC), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), and the Export-Import Bank of China —pushed forward major hydropower projects in disaster-prone valleys despite documented warnings, recurring historical floods, and unheeded safety recommendations.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine.