Skip to main content

Modi, Trump, and the price of silence: Washington’s noise, New Delhi’s nod?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
U.S. President Donald Trump has launched yet another barrage of statements that do little more than embarrass the U.S. administration and isolate the United States further on the global stage. His recent claim that he “stopped a war” between India and Pakistan may contain a grain of truth—especially given how both nations' leaders seem keen to remain in Washington’s good books—but it exposes deeper problems. For decades, I have maintained that Pakistan’s elite have been spinelessly obedient to U.S. interests. In fact, the country’s very creation was aimed at safeguarding colonial economic interests in South Asia.
Trump’s outbursts may hand political ammunition to India’s opposition parties, who are eager to corner Prime Minister Narendra Modi. However, obsessively focusing on events like the Balakot incident or the loss of fighter jets could be counterproductive. These are issues that are better exposed by independent voices—like the French journalists investigating alleged corruption in the Rafale deal—rather than being used as daily political footballs.
The Indian government’s response to U.S. interference has so far been timid. While leaders in countries such as Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico—who are quite literally in America’s backyard—are standing up to U.S. hegemony, India remains remarkably polite. Even opposition parties seem unwilling to challenge Washington’s growing impositions.
Donald Trump epitomizes a new kind of American arrogance—governing by tweet and driven more by ego than understanding. His 2016 victory was born out of domestic frustration with America’s endless foreign interventions disguised as pro-democracy missions. Yet, even his successor Joe Biden, under the pretense of countering Russia, pursued policies that proved equally dangerous. The effort to demonize Vladimir Putin backfired spectacularly. Russia is not Syria or Iran—it is a nuclear-armed global player with long-standing geopolitical concerns.
Trump’s fantasy of ending the Russia-Ukraine war “in 24 hours” was not just delusional; it showed a staggering ignorance of history and power dynamics. Meanwhile, Russian advances in eastern Ukraine continue, much of it being territory rich in rare earth elements—resources Western corporations had heavily invested in. Perhaps this is the real reason behind Trump’s visible frustration: economic interests disguised as diplomacy.
What the world is witnessing is a shift in power. Countries like Russia, China, Iran, Brazil, and North Korea are asserting themselves. India must now decide where it stands. If the U.S. continues to undermine India’s autonomy, it may inevitably push us toward strategic alternatives.
The era of unipolar dominance is over. Washington and London can no longer behave like schoolmasters in a classroom of disobedient children. We are entering a truly multipolar world where nations are demanding respect and equality—not lectures.
India must assert its sovereignty and resist U.S. and EU bullying. Western sanctions against Russia have largely failed, and recent aggressive rhetoric from some U.S. lawmakers—including calls to bomb Russia—reflects a dangerous mindset. Such statements expose the intellectual and moral decay among many Western leaders, who now seem more loyal to arms manufacturers than to peace and diplomacy.
It is time for realism and statesmanship. Global peace cannot be achieved without recognizing the complex legacies of Western colonialism. Much of today's global instability stems from borders and divisions imposed by British imperial policy, and meaningful peace will require confronting and correcting those historic injustices.
Western hypocrisy stands fully exposed when they justify the genocide in Gaza by defending Israel’s “right to self-defense” but refuse to acknowledge Russia’s own security concerns regarding NATO expansion. This selective morality has become the hallmark of Western diplomacy.
We are now at a critical juncture—perhaps the most dangerous moment since World War II. Leaders must rise to the occasion, not with bluster or bravado, but with wisdom, courage, and a genuine commitment to global justice. Let us strive for peace—not by preaching, but by listening, understanding, and correcting the wrongs of history.
---
*Human rights defender 

Comments

TRENDING

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Kolkata dialogue flags policy and finance deficit in wetland sustainability

By A Representative   Wetlands were the focus of India–Germany climate talks in Kolkata, where experts from government, business, and civil society stressed both their ecological importance and the urgent need for stronger conservation frameworks. 

Beyond Lata: How Asha Bhosle redefined the female voice with her underrated versatility

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The news of iconic Asha Bhosle’s ‘untimely’ demise has shocked music lovers across the country. Asha Tai was 92 years young. Normally, people celebrate a passing at this age, but Asha Bhosle—much like another legend, Dev Anand—never made us feel she was growing old. She was perhaps the most versatile artist in Bombay cinema. Hailing from a family devoted to music, Asha’s journey to success and fame was not easy. Her elder sister, Lata Mangeshkar, had already become the voice of women in cinema, and most contemporaries like Shamshad Begum, Suraiya, and Noor Jehan had slowly faded into oblivion. Frankly, there was no second or third to Lata Mangeshkar; she became the first—and perhaps the only—choice for music directors and all those who mattered in filmmaking. Asha started her musical journey at age 10 with a Marathi film, but her first break in Hindustani cinema came with the film "Chunariya" (1948). Though she was not the first choice of ...

Maoist activity in India: Weakening structures, 'shifts' in leadership, strategy and ideology

By Harsh Thakor*  Recent statements by government representatives have suggested that Maoism in India has been effectively eliminated, citing the weakening of central leadership and intensified security operations. These claims follow sustained counterinsurgency efforts across key regions, including central and eastern India. However, available information from security agencies and independent observers indicates that while the organizational structure of the CPI (Maoist) has been significantly disrupted, elements of the movement remain active. Reports acknowledge the continued presence of cadres in certain forested regions such as Bastar and parts of Dandakaranya, alongside smaller, decentralized units adapting their operational strategies.

From Manesar to Noida: Workers take to streets for bread, media looks away

By Sunil Kumar*   Across several states in India, a workers’ movement is gathering momentum. This is not a movement born of luxury or ambition, nor a demand for power-sharing within the state. At its core lies a stark and basic plea: the right to survive with dignity—adequate food, and wages sufficient to afford it.

Midnight weeping: The sociology of tragic vision in Badri Narayan’s poetry

By Ravi Ranjan*  Badri Narayan, a distinguished Hindi poet and social scientist, occupies a unique position in contemporary Indian intellectual life by bridging the worlds of creative literature and critical social inquiry. His poetic journey began significantly with the 1993 collection 'Saca Sune Hue Kaï Dina Hue' (Truth Heard Many Days Ago). As a social historian and cultural anthropologist, Narayan pioneered a methodological shift away from elite archives toward the oral traditions and folk myths of marginalized communities. He eventually legitimized "folk-ethnography" as a rigorous academic discipline during his tenure as Director of the G.B. Pant Social Science Institute.  

Why link women’s reservation to delimitation? The unspoken political calculus

By Vikas Meshram*  April 16, 2026, is likely to be recorded as a special day in the history of Indian democracy. In a three-day special session of Parliament, the central government is set to introduce a comprehensive package of three historic bills: the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026; the Delimitation Bill, 2026; and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026. The stated purpose of all three is the same: to implement the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam (106th Constitutional Amendment) passed in 2023. However, the political intent concealed behind these measures — and their impact on the federal balance — is far more profound. It is absolutely essential to understand this.

Catholic union opposes FCRA amendments, warns of threat to Church institutions

By A Representative   The All India Catholic Union (AICU) has raised serious concerns over what it describes as growing threats to religious freedom, minority rights, and constitutional safeguards in India, warning that recent policy and legislative trends could undermine the country’s secular and federal framework.

'It's power grab, not reform': Uttarakhand hills fear marginalization under new delimitation

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The proposed delimitation bill, coupled with the women’s reservation bill, is a calculated attempt to divert attention during state elections while laying the groundwork for long-term power consolidation through a north Indian hegemony. India’s constitution-making process was arduous, but it was guided by leaders deeply committed to unity and integrity. They ensured no community felt betrayed, and the foundation of modern India was laid on inclusivity. Any attempt to alter this balance must be approached with caution and respect for that legacy.