Skip to main content

Move to declare cow as Rajyamata 'overlooks': Savarkar advocated non-vegetarianism

By Ram Puniyani* 

For the past three decades, the cow has emerged as a significant emotive issue in Indian politics, often portrayed as a sacred animal. For many, she holds the status of a mother, and Hindu nationalist politics has effectively leveraged this sentiment to polarize society. Hindutva ideologue Vinayak Savarkar introduced the concept of Hindutva as embodying the essence of "Hinduness" beyond merely the Hindu religion. 
This concept became foundational for the RSS, which has been tirelessly pursuing the establishment of a Hindu nation for nearly a century. The last thirty years have been particularly advantageous for RSS politics, as the organization’s emotive issues dominate the national political landscape. This issue recently resurfaced in October 2024. 
The Maharashtra ruling coalition, led by the BJP, declared the indigenous cow breed, commonly referred to as Desi Gay, as Rajyamata-Gomata (state mother-cow mother). This move appears strategically timed ahead of the upcoming Maharashtra elections, where the BJP is perceived to be at a disadvantage following poor results in previous parliamentary elections. 
Consequently, they have turned to controversial tactics that deepen societal divisions. Simultaneously, a Karnataka minister made headlines by asserting that Savarkar, a key figure in Hindu nationalist ideology, was not inherently opposed to cow slaughter and did not regard the cow as sacred, viewing her instead as a useful animal. 
At a Gandhi Jayanti event in Bengaluru, Dinesh Gundu Rao claimed, “Savarkar was not only a meat-eater who consumed beef but also advocated for it publicly.” Minister Gundu Rao emphasized that despite being a Brahmin, Savarkar did not follow traditional dietary customs and embraced a modernist approach. He stated, “Savarkar was a Brahmin, but he ate beef and was a non-vegetarian. He did not oppose cow slaughter; in fact, he was quite progressive on that topic.” 
It is well-documented that Savarkar consumed meat. During one notable visit from Gandhi to Savarkar in London—while Gandhi sought support for his South African endeavors—Savarkar prepared a dinner of fried prawns, which Gandhi, adhering to vegetarianism, declined. Savarkar also expressed that cows should not be worshipped. 
According to author Vaibhav Purandare, “Savarkar believed that the cow is merely a bullock’s mother. While there is no concrete evidence of him eating cow, he was not opposed to eating beef.” Purandare elaborated during the Bangalore Literature Festival that Savarkar’s stance on cow protection was complex; he objected to killing cows out of malice towards Hindus but considered it acceptable if done simply for consumption. 
The question of the cow’s sanctity has been explored extensively, particularly regarding the practice of cow sacrifice during the Vedic period. Swami Vivekananda, in his writings, pointed out that cow sacrifices were part of sacred rituals, suggesting that consuming beef was not taboo. He stated, “You would be surprised to learn that, according to old customs, a good Hindu is one who eats beef. On certain occasions, he must sacrifice a bull and partake of it.” 
Research associated with the Ramakrishna Mission supports this view, noting that the Vedic Aryans, including Brahmins, consumed fish, meat, and even beef. Records indicate that while milch cows were spared, bulls and barren cows were sacrificed. 
Ambedkar's studies mirror these findings, with historian D. N. Jha highlighting that the cow was once considered food, alluding to the historical tensions between Buddhism and Brahmanism that contributed to the notion of the cow as a mother figure. This shift contributed to a Brahmin resurgence and the eventual decline of Buddhism in India. 
During the independence movement, communal politics saw the cow and pig become symbols used to incite conflict, with acts designed to provoke violence between communities, such as throwing beef in temples. The ongoing cow slaughter debates have led to tragic consequences, with incidents of lynching motivated by cow-related issues further igniting fear within the Muslim community. 
Harsh Mander, a noted humanitarian, initiated Caravan-a-Mohabbat to support families affected by such violence. Muslim communities face the brunt of this targeting, while beef consumers in northeastern states, Kerala, and Goa remain largely unaffected. Interestingly, the Maharashtra government has adeptly designated only indigenous cows as Rajyamata, differentiating them from others. 
As India’s beef exports increase, it is also worth noting that former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, during a meal in America, responded with humor when reminded of his beef consumption, asserting it was not an Indian cow, and thus posed no real issue. 
--- 
*Political  commentator

Comments

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

What's behind Donald Trump's 'narco-state' accusation against Venezuela

By Manolo De Los Santos  The US government has revived its campaign to label Venezuela a "narco-state", accusing its top leadership of drug trafficking and slapping hefty bounties on their heads for capture. This campaign, which only momentarily took a backseat, is a strategic fabrication, not a factual assessment. This accusation, particularly amplified under the Trump Administration, is a calculated smokescreen to justify a long-standing agenda: the overthrow of the Venezuelan government and the seizure of its vast oil and mineral resources. A closer examination of the facts reveals a country that has actively fought drug trafficking on its own terms and a US government with a clear and consistent history of destabilizing independent countries in Latin America.

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857  By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman*  Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”