Women's groups ask Rajasthan govt to appeal against acquittals in sati glorification cases

Counterview Desk

A coalition of women's organizations* in Rajasthan has issued a joint statement demanding that the state government file an appeal against the recent acquittal of accused in the Glorification of Sati cases of 1987. The organizations, which have been working on the Sati (Bride Burning) case since the tragic death of Roop Kanwar, expressed their disappointment and concern over the judiciary's decision.

The statement called upon Chief Minister Bhajan Lal to ensure that an appeal is filed against the recent acquittals and to take all necessary measures to uphold justice. The organizations also urged the government to stop all efforts to promote the practice of Sati.

Text:

We women's organizations who form a section of the women's movement in the state and who have worked on the Sati (Bride Burning) case since the 4th September 1987, when 19-year-old Roop Kanwar was forced onto the pyre of her husband, are not surprised that acquittal has come in yet another set of Glorification cases, filed in the aftermath of the Rajasthan Ordinance against Sati, 1987 and the Central Law called the Commission of Sati Prevention Act, 1987. We are very clear that delay in decisions by the judiciary as well as acquittal only reinforce a culture of Sati Glorification.

It should be known that more than 17 people (we have the cases) were acquitted on 31st January 2004, including those cases which involved erstwhile Health Minister Rajendra Singh Rathore, erstwhile Food and Transport Minister Pratap Singh Kachariywaas, senior leaders of the Sati Dharma Raksha Samiti and Rajput Sabha Bhawan Jaipur. The GOR law Department took a decision not to go in appeal, and the women's organizations went from pillar to post trying to have the acquittal challenged, as the trial was slipshod and neither the police, the prosecution, nor the Sati special court judge in Jaipur seemed to have done a fair job. It was a clear case for appeal. The CM, Ms. Vasundhara Raje, refused to budge from her position that this matter did not require any further legal pursuit.

With no other option but to go to court ourselves, 14 organizations and individuals* moved the Rajasthan High Court in a civil writ petition, praying that the HC order an appeal against the 17 accused in the four cases of glorification. Our writs too have been pending for the last 20 years.

Both parties, BJP and Congress, did not wish to antagonize the Rajput vote bank as leaders of both sides were implicated in the case

Successive Rajasthan governments, including the one led by Shri. Ashok Gehlot, also did not change their position, which is obvious as both parties did not wish to antagonize the Rajput vote bank and leaders of both sides were implicated in the case.

Since we cannot issue a press statement on the merits, as the judgment is not in our hands as yet, we continue to have only one demand:

That the present GOR, led by Sh. Bhajan Lal Sharma, should ask their law officers to file an appeal in these cases. The Public Prosecutor of the special court has already made public statements. These cases should go in appeal within the stipulated 90-day period of filing an appeal to the appellate court.
Pursue legal remedies in the 2004 cases, so that all those surviving of the four cases are punished by law.
Do not allow the promotion of the culture of Sati in the state, despite all efforts to break the law.

A second statement will be issued by us after we analyze the judgment and present the merits of appeal in the case.

---

* People's Union for Civil Liberties (Kavita Srivastava)

* All India Democratic Women's Association, Rajasthan (Sumitra Chopra)

* National Federation of Indian Women, Rajasthan (Nisha Sidhu)

* Vividha, women's documentation and Resource Centre (Mamta Jaitly)

* Rajasthan University Women's Association (Dr. Lad Kumari Jain)

* All India Progressive Women's Association (Manjula Sharma)

* Bharat Gyan Vigyan Samiti, Rajasthan (Komal Srivastava)

* National Muslim women's welfare society, Jaipur (Nishat Hussain)

* Mehnatkash Sewa evam Sandharbh Samiti, Rajasthan (Mewa Bharti)

* Academy for Socio Legal Studies (Dharmeshwari)

* Women's Rehabilitation Group (Renuka Pamecha)

* Women's cell, Rajasthan Karmachari Sangh (Asha Kalra)

* Vishakha, Mahila Shiksha evam Shodh Sansthan. (Shabnam)

* Dr. Pawan Surana, former Chairperson state women's commission

Comments

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

By A Representative A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Nepal votes amid regional rivalry: Why New Delhi is watching closely

By Nava Thakuria* As Nepal holds an early national election on Thursday (5 March 2026), the people of northeast India, along with other regional observers, are watching the proceedings closely. The vote was necessitated after the government of Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli collapsed in September 2025 following widespread anti-government protests. The election will determine the composition of the 275-member House of Representatives, originally scheduled for 2027, under the stewardship of an interim government led by former Supreme Court justice Sushila Karki.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey* Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel* The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava* Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.

From neglect to progress: The story of Ranavara’s community-led development

By Bharat Dogra Visitors to Ranavara, a remote village in Kherwara block of Udaipur district, are often surprised by its multi-dimensional progress. The village today is known for its impressive school building, regenerated pastures, expanded tree cover, and extensive water conservation and supply works. These achievements are the outcome of sustained community efforts over several years, demonstrating how small, consistent initiatives can lead to significant change.

Search This Blog