Skip to main content

'Patriarchal, anti-dissent': Rajiv Gandhi varsity VC 'harmful' for educational institutions

Counterview Desk 
National Alliance for Justice, Accountability & Rights (NAJAR), an initiative of the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), collectivizing "progressive legal professionals for democratic causes", has sought inquiry and legal action against vice chancellor of the  Rajiv Gandhi National Law University (RGNUL), for "objectionable actions" against the students protesting against his patriarchal stance. 
Seeking an end to gendered discrimination in the university, NAJAR said, the VC violated the principle of equality through his patriarchal and conservative thoughts and decisions, directed against women students studying law, pointed out, he "entered the girls’ hostel without any prior notice, and commented on the woman students' clothes", even reportedly made "sexist remarks."

Text:

 National Alliance for Justice, Accountability, and Rights (NAJAR), a pan-Indian collective of progressive legal professionals for democratic causes (including many lawyers, law students, law faculty, law researchers) extends our earnest solidarity to the protesting law students at Rajiv Gandhi National Law University (RGNUL), Patiala demanding accountability for the condemnable, shocking and unacceptable behaviour of the Vice-Chancellor. We are of the view that actions of Prof. (Dr.) Jai Shankar Singh, Vice Chancellor of RGNUL are in grave violation of the rights of liberty and privacy of the students and have brought disrepute to the institution and legal education as a whole. 
It has been widely reported that the Vice Chancellor entered the girls’ hostel without any prior notice, and commented on the woman students' clothes. This is despite the fact that even the parents of the students are not mandated to visit the girls’ hostel. He has also been accused of passing several sexist remarks, based on the clothing, extra-curricular participation, personal activities, etc. For instance, he has been criticized for making an extremely patriarchal remark when a female student told him about her research interest: “Ladki ho, domestic violence, marriage waale Acts uthaao aur aram se ghar par course karo. Kyu itna complicated aur naya topic leti ho?” (You are a woman, pick topics related to domestic violence or marriage, stay back home and pursue the course).  It has also been stated by students that the rules related to curfews, co-curricular activities like competitions, research, etc. have become arbitrary and more invasive. From this and various other statements, it stands clear that the Vice Chancellor has been consistently violating the principle of equality through his patriarchal and conservative thoughts and decisions, directed against women students studying law. 
In the light of these patriarchal remarks and gross violations of students’ privacy, the students of RGNUL, Patiala have begun a ‘Not Your Daughter’ movement against the Vice Chancellor, and have been demanding an unconditional apology and immediate resignation of the VC. As a result, the administration released an office order dated September 23, 2024, closing down of the University till further orders. While the Vice Chancellor has not interacted with students regarding these demands, the hostile, undemocratic response of the administration is clear through this order. This is an active effort to curb any legitimate, democratic protest by the students for their rights. 
Such a response by the administration not only shows that the Vice Chancellor is inefficient and harmful for an educational institution, but also points out a troubling pattern of curbing dissent in University spaces. Law schools are increasingly showing conservative and paternalistic trends by surveilling the movement of women students, the kind of educational choices made by students, and by suppressing dissent of students. Statements of the Vice Chancellor on the matter have again demonstrated his sexist attitude, belittling the legitimate complaints of the students. 
An interview of him has surfaced where he asserts his ‘lack of guilt’ by saying, “Agar koi mahila professor yeh complaint karti toh hum sun bhi lete, inn bacchon ke saath hum kya kar sakte hai?” (I would have listened if some woman professor made such a complaint, what can I do with these kids!) This is evidence enough that the Vice Chancellor does not see his students as adults and humans with dignity, right to liberty, and autonomy, but instead as someone with frivolous and false complaints. 
The University administration has further demonstrated a blatant disregard for the well-being of its students, denying access to washrooms and closing off roof areas. Demands for accountability have been met with punitive actions, such as contacting the parents of protesting students and threatening expulsion. This reflects a troubling lack of functional internal mechanisms, such as Grievance Redressal Systems, which exacerbates the dangers faced by students, particularly those from marginalized gender, caste, social backgrounds within the University environment.
Notably, there have been similar protests previously as well and demands by students at least since 2019, raising issues of gendered discrimination, sexual harassment, misogyny, restrictions on mobility and moral policing on campus. It is deeply worrying that there has been no institutional redress over the years. NAJAR emphasizes the importance of upholding the democratic rights of students in University spaces, stands unequivocally with the protesting students of RGNUL, and calls for the immediate resignation of the Vice Chancellor of RGNUL. Patriarchy and Misogyny can have no place in an institution that boasts of teaching law and the Constitution. 

NAJAR demands:

  • Immediate resignation of the Vice Chancellor of RGNUL, Prof. (Dr.) Jai Shankar Singh. 
  • An independent time-bound inquiry into the entire episode, based on which legal action against the Vice-Chancellor be taken. 
  • The University to uphold the democratic rights of the students and ensure no punitive action is taken against them.
  • Strengthening of internal mechanisms of accountability like the Anti-Sexual Harassment and Grievance Redressal Committees, to uphold the rights and safety of students within University spaces. 
  • A transparent scrutiny of all Vice-Chancellors prior to appointment, to ensure their commitment to the social and academic well-being of all students without discrimination. 

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Nepal votes amid regional rivalry: Why New Delhi is watching closely

By Nava Thakuria*  As Nepal holds an early national election on Thursday (5 March 2026), the people of northeast India, along with other regional observers, are watching the proceedings closely. The vote was necessitated after the government of Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli collapsed in September 2025 following widespread anti-government protests. The election will determine the composition of the 275-member House of Representatives, originally scheduled for 2027, under the stewardship of an interim government led by former Supreme Court justice Sushila Karki.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

From plagiarism to proxy exams: Galgotias and systemic failure in education

By Sandeep Pandey*   Shock is being expressed at Galgotias University being found presenting a Chinese-made robotic dog and a South Korean-made soccer-playing drone as its own creations at the recently held India AI Impact Summit 2026, a global event in New Delhi. Earlier, a UGC-listed journal had published a paper from the university titled “Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” which became the subject of widespread ridicule. Following the robotic dog controversy coming to light, the university has withdrawn the paper. These incidents are symptoms of deeper problems afflicting the Indian education system in general. Galgotias merely bit off more than it could chew.

Development vs community: New coal politics and old conflicts in Madhya Pradesh

By Deepmala Patel*  The Singrauli region of Madhya Pradesh, often described as “India’s energy capital,” has for decades been a hub of coal mining and thermal power generation. Today, the Dhirouli coal mine project in this district has triggered widespread protests among local communities. In recent years, the project has generated intense controversy, public opposition, and significant legal and social questions. This is not merely a dispute over one mine; it raises a larger question—who pays the price for energy development? Large corporate beneficiaries or the survival of local communities?

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.

From neglect to progress: The story of Ranavara’s community-led development

By Bharat Dogra   Visitors to Ranavara, a remote village in Kherwara block of Udaipur district, are often surprised by its multi-dimensional progress. The village today is known for its impressive school building, regenerated pastures, expanded tree cover, and extensive water conservation and supply works. These achievements are the outcome of sustained community efforts over several years, demonstrating how small, consistent initiatives can lead to significant change.