Where’s the urgency for the 2,000 MW Sharavati PSP in Western Ghats?

By Shankar Sharma*

A recent news article has raised credible concerns about the techno-economic clearance granted by the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) for a large Pumped Storage Project (PSP) located within a protected area in the dense Western Ghats of Karnataka. The article, titled "Where is the hurry for the 2,000 MW Sharavati PSP in Western Ghats?", questions the rationale behind this fast-tracked approval for such a massive project in an ecologically sensitive zone.

Environmentalists in Karnataka view this hurried approval as a stark example of the lack of due diligence on the part of multiple regulatory agencies when it comes to endorsing high-impact projects in eco-sensitive areas. Constitutionally mandated agencies like the CEA are expected to scrutinize proposals for such projects, particularly in protected areas, with a comprehensive view of societal welfare—not just through the lens of limited technical parameters.

There is also an undercurrent of corruption allegations tied to this project. Reports suggest that the construction contract may have already been awarded to a private contractor, with a significant advance payment made, even before obtaining essential environmental, wildlife, and forest clearances.

This Sharavati PSP proposal, along with 14 other PSP projects planned for the Western Ghats, has faced widespread criticism from environmentalists throughout the region. These critics see these projects as a violation of the authorities' Constitutional mandate to safeguard the environment. There are serious concerns that these projects will easily clear regulatory hurdles, only to wreak irreversible damage on the Western Ghats, which are recognized for their unique and critical biodiversity.

Many environmentalists have expressed shock that key issues—such as the project’s location within a wildlife sanctuary, the potential destruction of tropical evergreen forests, the low capacity utilization of the PSP, and the availability of more sustainable alternatives—were seemingly overlooked by the CEA when approving the project.

As an electrical engineer and power sector professional with nine years of experience at the CEA, I find it difficult to understand how this project could have been granted techno-economic clearance. Even from a purely economic standpoint, the approval of a PSP of this magnitude appears misguided. It seems evident that a thorough cost-benefit analysis of more credible alternatives, such as Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS), was not carried out before the clearance was given. Furthermore, it’s clear that domain experts from civil society were not effectively consulted during the decision-making process.

In strategic policy matters like this, it is hard to see how the government’s actions align with the Prime Minister’s vision of “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas, Sabka Prayas” (Together with all, Development for all, Trust of all, Effort of all).

Larger national concerns also loom over this issue, with media reports indicating that the Ministry of Power is considering the construction of 115,000 MW of PSPs across the country. This scale of development could lead to incalculable ecological damage, which our already fragile ecosystems may not be able to withstand.

CEA should publish a policy paper justifying the need for PSPs, detailing the costs and benefits relative to alternatives like BESS

Given the lack of a diligently prepared national energy policy from bodies like NITI Aayog, unsubstantiated energy policies—such as the promotion of PSPs, Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), gas-based power plants, and large solar and wind farms—are likely to face increasing opposition from civil society groups. These projects, along with new coal mines and transmission lines, raise serious questions about their long-term environmental and economic impacts.

It is imperative that the Union government takes these concerns seriously and applies effective course corrections before public trust in the regulatory agencies erodes further. Unfortunately, none of the responsible agencies or ministries have provided satisfactory responses to the issues raised by civil society, and there is no clarity on why experts from these groups are consistently excluded from discussions on such critical matters.

As a first step, the CEA should publish a policy paper justifying the need for PSPs, detailing the costs and benefits relative to alternatives like BESS, and explaining how the national electricity supply-demand scenario could be addressed through demand-side management (DSM) and other measures. The paper should also discuss how PSPs can be justified in the context of India’s rapidly degrading forest and river ecosystems, which are already in an alarming state of decline.

Addressing the issues raised in representations to the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) about the Sharavati PSP, as well as the broader relevance of PSPs for India, would be a crucial step toward finding a more balanced and sustainable energy policy.

---

*Power & Climate Policy Analyst, Karnataka. This article is based on the author’s representation to the Union Minister for Power

Comments

Plastic burning in homes threatens food, water and air across Global South: Study

By Jag Jivan In a groundbreaking study spanning 26 countries across the Global South , researchers have uncovered the widespread and concerning practice of households burning plastic waste as a fuel for cooking, heating, and other domestic needs. The research, published in Nature Communications , reveals that this hazardous method of managing both waste and energy poverty is driven by systemic failures in municipal services and the unaffordability of clean alternatives, posing severe risks to human health and the environment.

Economic superpower’s social failure? Inequality, malnutrition and crisis of India's democracy

By Vikas Meshram India may be celebrated as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, but a closer look at who benefits from that growth tells a starkly different story. The recently released World Inequality Report 2026 lays bare a country sharply divided by wealth, privilege and power. According to the report, nearly 65 percent of India’s total wealth is owned by the richest 10 percent of its population, while the bottom half of the country controls barely 6.4 percent. The top one percent—around 14 million people—holds more than 40 percent, the highest concentration since 1961. Meanwhile, the female labour force participation rate is a dismal 15.7 percent.

The greatest threat to our food system: The aggressive push for GM crops

By Bharat Dogra Thanks to the courageous resistance of several leading scientists who continue to speak the truth despite increasing pressures from the powerful GM crop and GM food lobby , the many-sided and in some contexts irreversible environmental and health impacts of GM foods and crops, as well as the highly disruptive effects of this technology on farmers, are widely known today.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra* The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

'Restructuring' Sahitya Akademi: Is the ‘Gujarat model’ reaching Delhi?

By Prakash N. Shah* A fortnight and a few days have slipped past that grim event. It was as if the wedding preparations were complete and the groom’s face was about to be unveiled behind the ceremonial tinsel. At 3 PM on December 18, a press conference was poised to announce the Sahitya Akademi Awards .

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

The illusion of nuclear abundance: Why NTPC’s expansion demands public scrutiny

By Shankar Sharma* The recent news that NTPC is scouting 30 potential sites across India for a massive nuclear power expansion should be a wake-up call for every citizen. While the state-owned utility frames this as a bold stride toward a 100,000 MW nuclear capacity by 2047, a cold look at India’s nuclear saga over the last few decades suggests this ambition may be more illusory than achievable. More importantly, it carries implications that could fundamentally alter the safety, environment, and economic health of our communities.

The war on junk food: Why India must adopt global warning labels

By Jag Jivan The global health landscape is witnessing a decisive shift toward aggressive regulation of the food industry, a movement highlighted by two significant policy developments shared by Dr. Arun Gupta of the Nutrition Advocacy for Public Interest (NAPi).

Search This Blog